Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
I'm just glad white supremacy is acceptable again
Comments
-
-
I'm glad white only events must be OK now since black only events are OK now.2001400ex said: -
I fucking hate white people.
-
This indeed is terrible. Because the moneys not appropriated to this agency doing God's work will indeed lead to more race riots in the streets.
-
-
Winners win.Swaye said:I fucking hate white people.
-
-
-
And private sector workers are any different? I know I'm working to retire, when I'm 50.RaceBannon said:
-
The fact that you asked that question says it all2001400ex said:
And private sector workers are any different? I know I'm working to retire, when I'm 50.RaceBannon said: -
Ok! Old man.RaceBannon said:
The fact that you asked that question says it all2001400ex said:
And private sector workers are any different? I know I'm working to retire, when I'm 50.RaceBannon said: -
If your life is as great as you like to pretend it is, why are you even posting here? Fuck off.Mosster47 said: -
Great. Now I can finally 'afford' a new TV. My pretend billables are down, so looting seems like the more realistic option.salemcoog said:This indeed is terrible. Because the moneys not appropriated to this agency doing God's work will indeed lead to more race riots in the streets.
-
It's a great day to be rhite
-
Because I hate the Washington Huskies and you're going to suck again soon and it's literally the funniest thing on the internet when it happens.oregonblitzkrieg said:
If your life is as great as you like to pretend it is, why are you even posting here? Fuck off.Mosster47 said: -
Just a friendly grammar lesson from a dumb kewg.Mosster47 said:
Because I hate the Washington Huskies and you're going to suck again soon and it'soregonblitzkrieg said:
If your life is as great as you like to pretend it is, why are you even posting here? Fuck off.Mosster47 said:literallyactually the funniest thing on the internet when it happens. -
I'm a husky now? Someone commit this lunatic.Mosster47 said:
Because I hate the Washington Huskies and you're going to suck again soon and it's literally the funniest thing on the internet when it happens.oregonblitzkrieg said:
If your life is as great as you like to pretend it is, why are you even posting here? Fuck off.Mosster47 said: -
Yellow is the new White.
-
Only 36 years to go!2001400ex said:
And private sector workers are any different? I know I'm working to retire, when I'm 50.RaceBannon said: -
Shit posting from a shit low-IQ poster.
Speaking of actual "hate", why again should the govt be giving any tax dollars to a group who's head has called the President of the US a Nazi that should be overthrown?
-
Wait, Trump isn't a Nazi?HoustonHusky said:Shit posting from a shit low-IQ poster.
Speaking of actual "hate", why again should the govt be giving any tax dollars to a group who's head has called the President of the US a Nazi that should be overthrown? -
This is what I mean. You assume a lot of shit about Pete you probably don't quite know. Maybe it's because he looks and sounds like the kind of guy who has credibility to you. It doesn't mean shit when it comes to this business. You also assume a lot of shit about Willie, who just got to this conference 5 minutes ago. I have no experience, and I strongly suspect you don't either, to substantiate your "likely" scenarios.creepycoug said:
Great. Now I can finally 'afford' a new TV. My pretend billables are down, so looting seems like the more realistic option.salemcoog said:This indeed is terrible. Because the moneys not appropriated to this agency doing God's work will indeed lead to more race riots in the streets.
I also have a hard time believing that Pete somehow knows how to read the academic issues better than most of other Pac 12 coaches. Pete is not recruiting to Stanford. That is a different animal altogether. Quit trying to act like the situations are even remotely similar. Fuck you guys have a man-crush on this dude, and it's so fucking predictable. None of these arguments would be made if he weren't winning.
If Pete needs someone and is convinced the kid is an elite talent, he'll go after him and make it work. If he chooses to not make it work, I would better guess it has to do with easier or better alternatives. I'm guessing the same is true at Oregon and with us? at WSU.
There is a bigger academic profile difference between UW and UCLA than there is between UW and Oregon or WSU. If UCLA can get a dummy, UW can get a dummy.
If we're just talking about handicapping some kid's odds of qualifying, I'm pretty sure you? don't have the only coach outside of Palo Alto who knows how to do it. -
Clever boy. You didn't think I'd find you here. You know I only do drive-bys at the Tug. But I found you, so ....GrundleStiltzkin said:
This is what I mean. You assume a lot of shit about Pete you probably don't quite know. Maybe it's because he looks and sounds like the kind of guy who has credibility to you. It doesn't mean shit when it comes to this business. You also assume a lot of shit about Willie, who just got to this conference 5 minutes ago. I have no experience, and I strongly suspect you don't either, to substantiate your "likely" scenarios.creepycoug said:
Great. Now I can finally 'afford' a new TV. My pretend billables are down, so looting seems like the more realistic option.salemcoog said:This indeed is terrible. Because the moneys not appropriated to this agency doing God's work will indeed lead to more race riots in the streets.
I also have a hard time believing that Pete somehow knows how to read the academic issues better than most of other Pac 12 coaches. Pete is not recruiting to Stanford. That is a different animal altogether. Quit trying to act like the situations are even remotely similar. Fuck you guys have a man-crush on this dude, and it's so fucking predictable. None of these arguments would be made if he weren't winning.
If Pete needs someone and is convinced the kid is an elite talent, he'll go after him and make it work. If he chooses to not make it work, I would better guess it has to do with easier or better alternatives. I'm guessing the same is true at Oregon and with us? at WSU.
There is a bigger academic profile difference between UW and UCLA than there is between UW and Oregon or WSU. If UCLA can get a dummy, UW can get a dummy.
If we're just talking about handicapping some kid's odds of qualifying, I'm pretty sure you? don't have the only coach outside of Palo Alto who knows how to do it.
This is what I mean. You assume a lot of shit about Pete you probably don't quite know. Maybe it's because he looks and sounds like the kind of guy who has credibility to you. It doesn't mean shit when it comes to this business. You also assume a lot of shit about Willie, who just got to this conference 5 minutes ago. I have no experience, and I strongly suspect you don't either, to substantiate your "likely" scenarios.
I also have a hard time believing that Pete somehow knows how to read the academic issues better than most of other Pac 12 coaches. Pete is not recruiting to Stanford. That is a different animal altogether. Quit trying to act like the situations are even remotely similar. Fuck you guys have a man-crush on this dude, and it's so fucking predictable. None of these arguments would be made if he weren't winning.
If Pete needs someone and is convinced the kid is an elite talent, he'll go after him and make it work. If he chooses to not make it work, I would better guess it has to do with easier or better alternatives. I'm guessing the same is true at Oregon and with us? at WSU.
There is a bigger academic profile difference between UW and UCLA than there is between UW and Oregon or WSU. If UCLA can get a dummy, UW can get a dummy.
If we're just talking about handicapping some kid's odds of qualifying, I'm pretty sure you? don't have the only coach outside of Palo Alto who knows how to do it. -
creepycoug said:
Clever boy. You didn't think I'd find you here. You know I only do drive-bys at the Tug. But I found you, so ....GrundleStiltzkin said:
This is what I mean. You assume a lot of shit about Pete you probably don't quite know. Maybe it's because he looks and sounds like the kind of guy who has credibility to you. It doesn't mean shit when it comes to this business. You also assume a lot of shit about Willie, who just got to this conference 5 minutes ago. I have no experience, and I strongly suspect you don't either, to substantiate your "likely" scenarios.creepycoug said:
Great. Now I can finally 'afford' a new TV. My pretend billables are down, so looting seems like the more realistic option.salemcoog said:This indeed is terrible. Because the moneys not appropriated to this agency doing God's work will indeed lead to more race riots in the streets.
I also have a hard time believing that Pete somehow knows how to read the academic issues better than most of other Pac 12 coaches. Pete is not recruiting to Stanford. That is a different animal altogether. Quit trying to act like the situations are even remotely similar. Fuck you guys have a man-crush on this dude, and it's so fucking predictable. None of these arguments would be made if he weren't winning.
If Pete needs someone and is convinced the kid is an elite talent, he'll go after him and make it work. If he chooses to not make it work, I would better guess it has to do with easier or better alternatives. I'm guessing the same is true at Oregon and with us? at WSU.
There is a bigger academic profile difference between UW and UCLA than there is between UW and Oregon or WSU. If UCLA can get a dummy, UW can get a dummy.
If we're just talking about handicapping some kid's odds of qualifying, I'm pretty sure you? don't have the only coach outside of Palo Alto who knows how to do it.
This is what I mean. You assume a lot of shit about Pete you probably don't quite know. Maybe it's because he looks and sounds like the kind of guy who has credibility to you. It doesn't mean shit when it comes to this business. You also assume a lot of shit about Willie, who just got to this conference 5 minutes ago. I have no experience, and I strongly suspect you don't either, to substantiate your "likely" scenarios.
I also have a hard time believing that Pete somehow knows how to read the academic issues better than most of other Pac 12 coaches. Pete is not recruiting to Stanford. That is a different animal altogether. Quit trying to act like the situations are even remotely similar. Fuck you guys have a man-crush on this dude, and it's so fucking predictable. None of these arguments would be made if he weren't winning.
If Pete needs someone and is convinced the kid is an elite talent, he'll go after him and make it work. If he chooses to not make it work, I would better guess it has to do with easier or better alternatives. I'm guessing the same is true at Oregon and with us? at WSU.
There is a bigger academic profile difference between UW and UCLA than there is between UW and Oregon or WSU. If UCLA can get a dummy, UW can get a dummy.
If we're just talking about handicapping some kid's odds of qualifying, I'm pretty sure you? don't have the only coach outside of Palo Alto who knows how to do it.
https://youtu.be/9Jz1TjCphXE
