Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Murdered DNC Staffer Seth Rich Shared 44,053 Democrat Emails With WikiLeaks

1235»

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,010 Founders Club
    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned

    Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
    So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

    Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
    It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
    I didn't mention the government
    Then it's not banning.
    Private people can ban.

    If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
    Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
    I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.

    I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.

    https://www.facebook.com/boycottrachelmaddow/

    Successful? Hannity probably increased his audience.

    Boycotts are tuff to pull off unless the company is a bunch of pussies. I don't think My Pillow cares if some retard wants a boycott.

    And his radio show is not Fox and has a bigger audience.

    Maddow would piss all over herself with her giant dong to have one fifth of the ratings CONS get

    The market should have removed her months ago. The best news for MSNBC is that FAUX News is going leftier and losing viewers.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,010 Founders Club
    I'm enjoying all the media types saying Trump made us hate them


    If that's what they need to believe.........
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    My Pillow advertises on Hannity?

    image

    That dude looks like he touches 8 year olds
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    AZDuck said:

    My Pillow advertises on Hannity?

    image

    That dude looks like he touches 8 year olds

    Is that Melissa McCarthy's husband?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,010 Founders Club
    I actually bought 2 my pillows on amazon and they are awesome

    First time for everything I guess
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RedRocket
    RedRocket Member Posts: 1,527
    RaceBannon said:

    I actually bought 2 my pillows on amazon and they are awesome

    First time for everything I guess

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned

    Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
    So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

    Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
    It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
    I didn't mention the government
    Then it's not banning.
    Private people can ban.

    If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
    Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
    I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.

    I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.

    https://www.facebook.com/boycottrachelmaddow/

    Successful? Hannity probably increased his audience.

    Boycotts are tuff to pull off unless the company is a bunch of pussies. I don't think My Pillow cares if some retard wants a boycott.

    And his radio show is not Fox and has a bigger audience.

    Maddow would piss all over herself with her giant dong to have one fifth of the ratings CONS get

    The market should have removed her months ago. The best news for MSNBC is that FAUX News is going leftier and losing viewers.
    yeah, totally. But I guess now that we're calling establishment shills like the washington post and CNN "liberal" this makes sense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    dhdawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned

    Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
    So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

    Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
    It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
    I didn't mention the government
    Then it's not banning.
    Private people can ban.

    If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
    Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
    I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.

    I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.

    https://www.facebook.com/boycottrachelmaddow/

    Successful? Hannity probably increased his audience.

    Boycotts are tuff to pull off unless the company is a bunch of pussies. I don't think My Pillow cares if some retard wants a boycott.

    And his radio show is not Fox and has a bigger audience.

    Maddow would piss all over herself with her giant dong to have one fifth of the ratings CONS get

    The market should have removed her months ago. The best news for MSNBC is that FAUX News is going leftier and losing viewers.
    yeah, totally. But I guess now that we're calling establishment shills like the washington post and CNN "liberal" this makes sense.
    I'll give you the WaPo but you're nuts if you don't think CNN is well left of center.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    dnc said:

    dhdawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned

    Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
    So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

    Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
    It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
    I didn't mention the government
    Then it's not banning.
    Private people can ban.

    If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
    Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
    I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.

    I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.

    https://www.facebook.com/boycottrachelmaddow/

    Successful? Hannity probably increased his audience.

    Boycotts are tuff to pull off unless the company is a bunch of pussies. I don't think My Pillow cares if some retard wants a boycott.

    And his radio show is not Fox and has a bigger audience.

    Maddow would piss all over herself with her giant dong to have one fifth of the ratings CONS get

    The market should have removed her months ago. The best news for MSNBC is that FAUX News is going leftier and losing viewers.
    yeah, totally. But I guess now that we're calling establishment shills like the washington post and CNN "liberal" this makes sense.
    I'll give you the WaPo but you're nuts if you don't think CNN is well left of center.
    CNN's joke panels that include Jeff lord rick Santorum and Jason miller is about as liberal as gary's johnson
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,797 Standard Supporter
    Clintonitis is a very deadly disease.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369
    RaceBannon said:

    A lot of folks sound awfully defensive about Seth Richard's murder.

    You know more than us but can't or won't say, right? Will you share on podcast?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Well i'll be damned.

    https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3904057-Wheeler-Filed-Complaint.html
    "Rod Wheeler, the private investigator cited by Fox News for its retracted report claiming former DNC staffer Seth Rich was murdered for leaking emails to WikiLeaks, has now sued the network, claiming they: 1) Fabricated quotes from him to make the false connection; 2) Sent an article draft to the White House for review; and 3) Took orders directly from Trump to establish a connection between the DNC and Rich’s murder “to help lift the cloud of the Russia investigation.”
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    dnc said:

    dhdawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned

    Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
    So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

    Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
    It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
    I didn't mention the government
    Then it's not banning.
    Private people can ban.

    If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
    Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
    I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.

    I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.

    https://www.facebook.com/boycottrachelmaddow/

    Successful? Hannity probably increased his audience.

    Boycotts are tuff to pull off unless the company is a bunch of pussies. I don't think My Pillow cares if some retard wants a boycott.

    And his radio show is not Fox and has a bigger audience.

    Maddow would piss all over herself with her giant dong to have one fifth of the ratings CONS get

    The market should have removed her months ago. The best news for MSNBC is that FAUX News is going leftier and losing viewers.
    yeah, totally. But I guess now that we're calling establishment shills like the washington post and CNN "liberal" this makes sense.
    I'll give you the WaPo but you're nuts if you don't think CNN is well left of center.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Well i'll be damned.

    https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3904057-Wheeler-Filed-Complaint.html

    "Rod Wheeler, the private investigator cited by Fox News for its retracted report claiming former DNC staffer Seth Rich was murdered for leaking emails to WikiLeaks, has now sued the network, claiming they: 1) Fabricated quotes from him to make the false connection; 2) Sent an article draft to the White House for review; and 3) Took orders directly from Trump to establish a connection between the DNC and Rich’s murder “to help lift the cloud of the Russia investigation.”
    It's never the action. It's always the cover up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Saracen
    Saracen Member Posts: 270
    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned

    Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
    So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

    Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
    It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
    I didn't mention the government
    Then it's not banning.
    Private people can ban.

    If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
    Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
    I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.

    I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.

    https://www.facebook.com/boycottrachelmaddow/

    Successful? Hannity probably increased his audience.

    Boycotts are tuff to pull off unless the company is a bunch of pussies. I don't think My Pillow cares if some retard wants a boycott.

    And his radio show is not Fox and has a bigger audience.

    Maddow would piss all over herself with her giant dong to have one fifth of the ratings CONS get

    The market should have removed her months ago. The best news for MSNBC is that FAUX News is going leftier and losing viewers.
    Other than the fact that Maddow finished this past quarter as the No. 1 show across all of cable news in the all-important A25-54 demographic this analysis is spot on! I'm sure that market prediction of them cutting her loose is gonna become a reality any time now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,010 Founders Club
    Saracen said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned

    Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
    So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

    Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
    It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
    I didn't mention the government
    Then it's not banning.
    Private people can ban.

    If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
    Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
    I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.

    I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.

    https://www.facebook.com/boycottrachelmaddow/

    Successful? Hannity probably increased his audience.

    Boycotts are tuff to pull off unless the company is a bunch of pussies. I don't think My Pillow cares if some retard wants a boycott.

    And his radio show is not Fox and has a bigger audience.

    Maddow would piss all over herself with her giant dong to have one fifth of the ratings CONS get

    The market should have removed her months ago. The best news for MSNBC is that FAUX News is going leftier and losing viewers.
    Other than the fact that Maddow finished this past quarter as the No. 1 show across all of cable news in the all-important A25-54 demographic this analysis is spot on! I'm sure that market prediction of them cutting her loose is gonna become a reality any time now.
    Other than the fact that Rush still has 20 times her audience you'd have a great point. As we see here the Clinton losers are still butt hurt and watching that shit every night looking for more tax return bombshells.

    I turned off cable news when Trump got the nod.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    Saracen said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AZDuck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RaceBannon said:

    I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned

    Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
    So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

    Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
    It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
    I didn't mention the government
    Then it's not banning.
    Private people can ban.

    If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
    Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
    I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.

    I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.

    https://www.facebook.com/boycottrachelmaddow/

    Successful? Hannity probably increased his audience.

    Boycotts are tuff to pull off unless the company is a bunch of pussies. I don't think My Pillow cares if some retard wants a boycott.

    And his radio show is not Fox and has a bigger audience.

    Maddow would piss all over herself with her giant dong to have one fifth of the ratings CONS get

    The market should have removed her months ago. The best news for MSNBC is that FAUX News is going leftier and losing viewers.
    Other than the fact that Maddow finished this past quarter as the No. 1 show across all of cable news in the all-important A25-54 demographic this analysis is spot on! I'm sure that market prediction of them cutting her loose is gonna become a reality any time now.
    Other than the fact that Rush still has 20 times her audience you'd have a great point. As we see here the Clinton losers are still butt hurt and watching that shit every night looking for more tax return bombshells.

    I turned off cable news when Trump got the nod.
    WGAF about TV and radio ratings?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter