Murdered DNC Staffer Seth Rich Shared 44,053 Democrat Emails With WikiLeaks

HoustonHusky · May 2017

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

HardlyClothed said:
This thread is a black eye for @HoustonHusky
Why again? Fox retracted it story which means its claims of "proof" are BS and that reporter is/should be fired, but doesn't change much of what is know, which is:

1) Seth, a known Bernie supporter who had access to the info was gunned down in suspicious circumstances. A crazy hacker with a vendetta against the Dems claims Seth and he leaked the DNC emails (and claimed back in 2015 something like the leak would happen), which in and of itself wouldn't mean much but it is rather strange Assange pretty much backed up his claim.

2) one of the IT workers for the DNC who had access to the DNC emails is now in Pakistan under govt protection
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/22/sources-democratic-aide-suspected-of-major-security-breach-under-government-protection-in-pakistan/
while the rest of that group are suspicious sacks with all sorts of issues and fleeing the country.

3) It came out Obama was illegally monitoring Americans and Clapper constantly reviewed that information, and even that corrupt SOB had to say he's seen absolutely zero evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia.

(and 4) this board is currently unreadable with it constantly jumping up to the top...no clue how most of you can stand reading this).

Carry on now...

Do you go to Joel Osteen's megachurch?

Only 10 year ago when it use to house the Rockets and concerts.

Since we are axing questions, you the Unipiper?

AZDuck · May 2017

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

HardlyClothed said:
This thread is a black eye for @HoustonHusky
Why again? Fox retracted it story which means its claims of "proof" are BS and that reporter is/should be fired, but doesn't change much of what is know, which is:

1) Seth, a known Bernie supporter who had access to the info was gunned down in suspicious circumstances. A crazy hacker with a vendetta against the Dems claims Seth and he leaked the DNC emails (and claimed back in 2015 something like the leak would happen), which in and of itself wouldn't mean much but it is rather strange Assange pretty much backed up his claim.

2) one of the IT workers for the DNC who had access to the DNC emails is now in Pakistan under govt protection
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/22/sources-democratic-aide-suspected-of-major-security-breach-under-government-protection-in-pakistan/
while the rest of that group are suspicious sacks with all sorts of issues and fleeing the country.

3) It came out Obama was illegally monitoring Americans and Clapper constantly reviewed that information, and even that corrupt SOB had to say he's seen absolutely zero evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia.

(and 4) this board is currently unreadable with it constantly jumping up to the top...no clue how most of you can stand reading this).

Carry on now...

Do you go to Joel Osteen's megachurch?

Only 10 year ago when it use to house the Rockets and concerts.

Since we are axing questions, you the Unipiper?

Is he someone who's right about fucktarded conspiracy theories? If so, then yes

HoustonHusky · May 2017

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

HardlyClothed said:
This thread is a black eye for @HoustonHusky
Why again? Fox retracted it story which means its claims of "proof" are BS and that reporter is/should be fired, but doesn't change much of what is know, which is:

1) Seth, a known Bernie supporter who had access to the info was gunned down in suspicious circumstances. A crazy hacker with a vendetta against the Dems claims Seth and he leaked the DNC emails (and claimed back in 2015 something like the leak would happen), which in and of itself wouldn't mean much but it is rather strange Assange pretty much backed up his claim.

2) one of the IT workers for the DNC who had access to the DNC emails is now in Pakistan under govt protection
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/22/sources-democratic-aide-suspected-of-major-security-breach-under-government-protection-in-pakistan/
while the rest of that group are suspicious sacks with all sorts of issues and fleeing the country.

3) It came out Obama was illegally monitoring Americans and Clapper constantly reviewed that information, and even that corrupt SOB had to say he's seen absolutely zero evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia.

(and 4) this board is currently unreadable with it constantly jumping up to the top...no clue how most of you can stand reading this).

Carry on now...

Do you go to Joel Osteen's megachurch?

Only 10 year ago when it use to house the Rockets and concerts.

Since we are axing questions, you the Unipiper?
Is he someone who's right about fucktarded conspiracy theories? If so, then yes

Says the guy who posts daily about how some non-event is going to lead to WW3, immediate impeachment, or some other earth-shattering event?

AZDuck · May 2017

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

HardlyClothed said:
This thread is a black eye for @HoustonHusky
Why again? Fox retracted it story which means its claims of "proof" are BS and that reporter is/should be fired, but doesn't change much of what is know, which is:

1) Seth, a known Bernie supporter who had access to the info was gunned down in suspicious circumstances. A crazy hacker with a vendetta against the Dems claims Seth and he leaked the DNC emails (and claimed back in 2015 something like the leak would happen), which in and of itself wouldn't mean much but it is rather strange Assange pretty much backed up his claim.

2) one of the IT workers for the DNC who had access to the DNC emails is now in Pakistan under govt protection
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/22/sources-democratic-aide-suspected-of-major-security-breach-under-government-protection-in-pakistan/
while the rest of that group are suspicious sacks with all sorts of issues and fleeing the country.

3) It came out Obama was illegally monitoring Americans and Clapper constantly reviewed that information, and even that corrupt SOB had to say he's seen absolutely zero evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia.

(and 4) this board is currently unreadable with it constantly jumping up to the top...no clue how most of you can stand reading this).

Carry on now...

Do you go to Joel Osteen's megachurch?

Only 10 year ago when it use to house the Rockets and concerts.

Since we are axing questions, you the Unipiper?
Is he someone who's right about fucktarded conspiracy theories? If so, then yes
Says the guy who posts daily about how some non-event is going to lead to WW3, immediate impeachment, or some other earth-shattering event?

yeah... not really. I think I've been clear as hell that impeachment is political and the Republican Congress isn't going to do that, no matter what Bob Mueller finds. As far as WW3, also no, but a second Korean war would be bad enough, which seems to be very much in the cards right now.

You do you, and do whatever you have to do to try and get everyone to forget that you started this shit-show of a conspiracy theory thread.

@ClintonBodyCountDawg ?

WilburHooksHands · May 2017

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

HardlyClothed said:
This thread is a black eye for @HoustonHusky
Why again? Fox retracted it story which means its claims of "proof" are BS and that reporter is/should be fired, but doesn't change much of what is know, which is:

1) Seth, a known Bernie supporter who had access to the info was gunned down in suspicious circumstances. A crazy hacker with a vendetta against the Dems claims Seth and he leaked the DNC emails (and claimed back in 2015 something like the leak would happen), which in and of itself wouldn't mean much but it is rather strange Assange pretty much backed up his claim.

2) one of the IT workers for the DNC who had access to the DNC emails is now in Pakistan under govt protection
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/22/sources-democratic-aide-suspected-of-major-security-breach-under-government-protection-in-pakistan/
while the rest of that group are suspicious sacks with all sorts of issues and fleeing the country.

3) It came out Obama was illegally monitoring Americans and Clapper constantly reviewed that information, and even that corrupt SOB had to say he's seen absolutely zero evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia.

(and 4) this board is currently unreadable with it constantly jumping up to the top...no clue how most of you can stand reading this).

Carry on now...

Do you go to Joel Osteen's megachurch?

I watched a muslim win titles in that church.

HoustonHusky · May 2017

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

HardlyClothed said:
This thread is a black eye for @HoustonHusky
Why again? Fox retracted it story which means its claims of "proof" are BS and that reporter is/should be fired, but doesn't change much of what is know, which is:

1) Seth, a known Bernie supporter who had access to the info was gunned down in suspicious circumstances. A crazy hacker with a vendetta against the Dems claims Seth and he leaked the DNC emails (and claimed back in 2015 something like the leak would happen), which in and of itself wouldn't mean much but it is rather strange Assange pretty much backed up his claim.

2) one of the IT workers for the DNC who had access to the DNC emails is now in Pakistan under govt protection
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/22/sources-democratic-aide-suspected-of-major-security-breach-under-government-protection-in-pakistan/
while the rest of that group are suspicious sacks with all sorts of issues and fleeing the country.

3) It came out Obama was illegally monitoring Americans and Clapper constantly reviewed that information, and even that corrupt SOB had to say he's seen absolutely zero evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia.

(and 4) this board is currently unreadable with it constantly jumping up to the top...no clue how most of you can stand reading this).

Carry on now...

Do you go to Joel Osteen's megachurch?

Only 10 year ago when it use to house the Rockets and concerts.

Since we are axing questions, you the Unipiper?
Is he someone who's right about fucktarded conspiracy theories? If so, then yes
Says the guy who posts daily about how some non-event is going to lead to WW3, immediate impeachment, or some other earth-shattering event?

yeah... not really.

Really? In the last ~week threads only...
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39558/stupid-or-wily
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39551/professional-scaremonger-sez-war-with-nk-imminent
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39361/it-was-just-light-treason
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39383/hes-a-good-guy

Not to exclude the comments in other threads...

AZDuck · May 2017

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

HardlyClothed said:
This thread is a black eye for @HoustonHusky
Why again? Fox retracted it story which means its claims of "proof" are BS and that reporter is/should be fired, but doesn't change much of what is know, which is:

1) Seth, a known Bernie supporter who had access to the info was gunned down in suspicious circumstances. A crazy hacker with a vendetta against the Dems claims Seth and he leaked the DNC emails (and claimed back in 2015 something like the leak would happen), which in and of itself wouldn't mean much but it is rather strange Assange pretty much backed up his claim.

2) one of the IT workers for the DNC who had access to the DNC emails is now in Pakistan under govt protection
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/22/sources-democratic-aide-suspected-of-major-security-breach-under-government-protection-in-pakistan/
while the rest of that group are suspicious sacks with all sorts of issues and fleeing the country.

3) It came out Obama was illegally monitoring Americans and Clapper constantly reviewed that information, and even that corrupt SOB had to say he's seen absolutely zero evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia.

(and 4) this board is currently unreadable with it constantly jumping up to the top...no clue how most of you can stand reading this).

Carry on now...

Do you go to Joel Osteen's megachurch?

Only 10 year ago when it use to house the Rockets and concerts.

Since we are axing questions, you the Unipiper?
Is he someone who's right about fucktarded conspiracy theories? If so, then yes
Says the guy who posts daily about how some non-event is going to lead to WW3, immediate impeachment, or some other earth-shattering event?

yeah... not really.
Really? In the last ~week threads only...
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39558/stupid-or-wily
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39551/professional-scaremonger-sez-war-with-nk-imminent
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39361/it-was-just-light-treason
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39383/hes-a-good-guy

Not to exclude the comments in other threads...

Now I know what you keep falling for these pesky conspiracy theories.

YOU CAN'T READ!!!

Every instance of me saying "impeach" in those threds:

(1) "Republicans will never impeach."
(2) "Grounds for impeachment are political (bullshit). They're whatever Congress says they are. Basically, Congress is supposed to act as a check on the executive when they fuck up badly.
But, the Constitution sez 'treason, bribery, and high crimes and misdemeanors.'
A decent case can be made for at least two of those four, if not all four."

Every instance of me saying WW3 in those threds:

- 404 not found

RaceBannon · May 2017

A lot of folks sound awfully defensive about Seth Richard's murder.

AZDuck · May 2017

RaceBannon said:
A lot of folks sound awfully defensive about Seth Richard's murder.

WTFISR?

RaceBannon · May 2017

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:
A lot of folks sound awfully defensive about Seth Richard's murder.

WTFISR?

See?

bananasnblondes · May 2017

Hannity is beginning to lose advertisers by virtue of the free market, or as he calls it, "liberal fascism"

ThomasFremont · May 2017

@HoustonHusky with the double down and it's going GREAT.

AZDuck · May 2017

ThomasFremont said:
@HoustonHusky with the double down and it's going GREAT.

Going where even Sean Hannity fears to tread.

RaceBannon · May 2017

I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned

TierbsHsotBoobs · May 2017

RaceBannon said:
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned

Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.

RaceBannon · May 2017

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.

So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking

AZDuck · May 2017

RaceBannon said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking

It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.

RaceBannon · May 2017

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.

I didn't mention the government

AZDuck · May 2017

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government

Then it's not banning.

GrundleStiltzkin · May 2017

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.

Is this banning?

RaceBannon · May 2017

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.

Private people can ban.

AZDuck · May 2017

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.

If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.

HoustonHusky · May 2017

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

HardlyClothed said:
This thread is a black eye for @HoustonHusky
Why again? Fox retracted it story which means its claims of "proof" are BS and that reporter is/should be fired, but doesn't change much of what is know, which is:

1) Seth, a known Bernie supporter who had access to the info was gunned down in suspicious circumstances. A crazy hacker with a vendetta against the Dems claims Seth and he leaked the DNC emails (and claimed back in 2015 something like the leak would happen), which in and of itself wouldn't mean much but it is rather strange Assange pretty much backed up his claim.

2) one of the IT workers for the DNC who had access to the DNC emails is now in Pakistan under govt protection
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/22/sources-democratic-aide-suspected-of-major-security-breach-under-government-protection-in-pakistan/
while the rest of that group are suspicious sacks with all sorts of issues and fleeing the country.

3) It came out Obama was illegally monitoring Americans and Clapper constantly reviewed that information, and even that corrupt SOB had to say he's seen absolutely zero evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia.

(and 4) this board is currently unreadable with it constantly jumping up to the top...no clue how most of you can stand reading this).

Carry on now...

Do you go to Joel Osteen's megachurch?

Only 10 year ago when it use to house the Rockets and concerts.

Since we are axing questions, you the Unipiper?
Is he someone who's right about fucktarded conspiracy theories? If so, then yes
Says the guy who posts daily about how some non-event is going to lead to WW3, immediate impeachment, or some other earth-shattering event?

yeah... not really.
Really? In the last ~week threads only...
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39558/stupid-or-wily
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39551/professional-scaremonger-sez-war-with-nk-imminent
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39361/it-was-just-light-treason
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39383/hes-a-good-guy

Not to exclude the comments in other threads...

Now I know what you keep falling for these pesky conspiracy theories.

YOU CAN'T READ!!!

Every instance of me saying "impeach" in those threds:

(1) "Republicans will never impeach."
(2) "Grounds for impeachment are political (bullshit). They're whatever Congress says they are. Basically, Congress is supposed to act as a check on the executive when they fuck up badly.
But, the Constitution sez 'treason, bribery, and high crimes and misdemeanors.'
A decent case can be made for at least two of those four, if not all four."

Every instance of me saying WW3 in those threds:

- 404 not found

So you accused him of all the reasons that are grounds for impeachment as defined by the Constitution but you didn't say impeach. And you said several things will lead to (nuclear) war with Korea but that's not WW3?

Now you are heading into HondoFS territory...

AZDuck · May 2017

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

HardlyClothed said:
This thread is a black eye for @HoustonHusky
Why again? Fox retracted it story which means its claims of "proof" are BS and that reporter is/should be fired, but doesn't change much of what is know, which is:

1) Seth, a known Bernie supporter who had access to the info was gunned down in suspicious circumstances. A crazy hacker with a vendetta against the Dems claims Seth and he leaked the DNC emails (and claimed back in 2015 something like the leak would happen), which in and of itself wouldn't mean much but it is rather strange Assange pretty much backed up his claim.

2) one of the IT workers for the DNC who had access to the DNC emails is now in Pakistan under govt protection
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/22/sources-democratic-aide-suspected-of-major-security-breach-under-government-protection-in-pakistan/
while the rest of that group are suspicious sacks with all sorts of issues and fleeing the country.

3) It came out Obama was illegally monitoring Americans and Clapper constantly reviewed that information, and even that corrupt SOB had to say he's seen absolutely zero evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia.

(and 4) this board is currently unreadable with it constantly jumping up to the top...no clue how most of you can stand reading this).

Carry on now...

Do you go to Joel Osteen's megachurch?

Only 10 year ago when it use to house the Rockets and concerts.

Since we are axing questions, you the Unipiper?
Is he someone who's right about fucktarded conspiracy theories? If so, then yes
Says the guy who posts daily about how some non-event is going to lead to WW3, immediate impeachment, or some other earth-shattering event?

yeah... not really.
Really? In the last ~week threads only...
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39558/stupid-or-wily
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39551/professional-scaremonger-sez-war-with-nk-imminent
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39361/it-was-just-light-treason
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39383/hes-a-good-guy

Not to exclude the comments in other threads...

Now I know what you keep falling for these pesky conspiracy theories.

YOU CAN'T READ!!!

Every instance of me saying "impeach" in those threds:

(1) "Republicans will never impeach."
(2) "Grounds for impeachment are political (bullshit). They're whatever Congress says they are. Basically, Congress is supposed to act as a check on the executive when they fuck up badly.
But, the Constitution sez 'treason, bribery, and high crimes and misdemeanors.'
A decent case can be made for at least two of those four, if not all four."

Every instance of me saying WW3 in those threds:

- 404 not found
So you accused him of all the reasons that are grounds for impeachment as defined by the Constitution but you didn't say impeach. And you said several things will lead to (nuclear) war with Korea but that's not WW3?

Now you are heading into HondoFS territory...

keep fuckin' that chicken

RaceBannon · May 2017

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.

If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.

Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim

UWhuskytskeet · May 2017

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.

If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim

Says the guy cheering on a politician that stifles voices with a body slam.

AZDuck · May 2017

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.

If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim

I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.

I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.

https://www.facebook.com/boycottrachelmaddow/

Kaepsknee · May 2017

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

HardlyClothed said:
This thread is a black eye for @HoustonHusky
Why again? Fox retracted it story which means its claims of "proof" are BS and that reporter is/should be fired, but doesn't change much of what is know, which is:

1) Seth, a known Bernie supporter who had access to the info was gunned down in suspicious circumstances. A crazy hacker with a vendetta against the Dems claims Seth and he leaked the DNC emails (and claimed back in 2015 something like the leak would happen), which in and of itself wouldn't mean much but it is rather strange Assange pretty much backed up his claim.

2) one of the IT workers for the DNC who had access to the DNC emails is now in Pakistan under govt protection
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/22/sources-democratic-aide-suspected-of-major-security-breach-under-government-protection-in-pakistan/
while the rest of that group are suspicious sacks with all sorts of issues and fleeing the country.

3) It came out Obama was illegally monitoring Americans and Clapper constantly reviewed that information, and even that corrupt SOB had to say he's seen absolutely zero evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia.

(and 4) this board is currently unreadable with it constantly jumping up to the top...no clue how most of you can stand reading this).

Carry on now...

Do you go to Joel Osteen's megachurch?

Only 10 year ago when it use to house the Rockets and concerts.

Since we are axing questions, you the Unipiper?
Is he someone who's right about fucktarded conspiracy theories? If so, then yes
Says the guy who posts daily about how some non-event is going to lead to WW3, immediate impeachment, or some other earth-shattering event?

yeah... not really.
Really? In the last ~week threads only...
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39558/stupid-or-wily
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39551/professional-scaremonger-sez-war-with-nk-imminent
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39361/it-was-just-light-treason
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39383/hes-a-good-guy

Not to exclude the comments in other threads...

Now I know what you keep falling for these pesky conspiracy theories.

YOU CAN'T READ!!!

Every instance of me saying "impeach" in those threds:

(1) "Republicans will never impeach."
(2) "Grounds for impeachment are political (bullshit). They're whatever Congress says they are. Basically, Congress is supposed to act as a check on the executive when they fuck up badly.
But, the Constitution sez 'treason, bribery, and high crimes and misdemeanors.'
A decent case can be made for at least two of those four, if not all four."

Every instance of me saying WW3 in those threds:

- 404 not found
So you accused him of all the reasons that are grounds for impeachment as defined by the Constitution but you didn't say impeach. And you said several things will lead to (nuclear) war with Korea but that's not WW3?

Now you are heading into HondoFS territory...
keep fuckin' that chicken

Are we in for another Sandwich meltdown?

AZDuck · May 2017

salemcoog said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

AZDuck said:

HoustonHusky said:

HardlyClothed said:
This thread is a black eye for @HoustonHusky
Why again? Fox retracted it story which means its claims of "proof" are BS and that reporter is/should be fired, but doesn't change much of what is know, which is:

1) Seth, a known Bernie supporter who had access to the info was gunned down in suspicious circumstances. A crazy hacker with a vendetta against the Dems claims Seth and he leaked the DNC emails (and claimed back in 2015 something like the leak would happen), which in and of itself wouldn't mean much but it is rather strange Assange pretty much backed up his claim.

2) one of the IT workers for the DNC who had access to the DNC emails is now in Pakistan under govt protection
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/22/sources-democratic-aide-suspected-of-major-security-breach-under-government-protection-in-pakistan/
while the rest of that group are suspicious sacks with all sorts of issues and fleeing the country.

3) It came out Obama was illegally monitoring Americans and Clapper constantly reviewed that information, and even that corrupt SOB had to say he's seen absolutely zero evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia.

(and 4) this board is currently unreadable with it constantly jumping up to the top...no clue how most of you can stand reading this).

Carry on now...

Do you go to Joel Osteen's megachurch?

Only 10 year ago when it use to house the Rockets and concerts.

Since we are axing questions, you the Unipiper?
Is he someone who's right about fucktarded conspiracy theories? If so, then yes
Says the guy who posts daily about how some non-event is going to lead to WW3, immediate impeachment, or some other earth-shattering event?

yeah... not really.
Really? In the last ~week threads only...
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39558/stupid-or-wily
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39551/professional-scaremonger-sez-war-with-nk-imminent
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39361/it-was-just-light-treason
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/39383/hes-a-good-guy

Not to exclude the comments in other threads...

Now I know what you keep falling for these pesky conspiracy theories.

YOU CAN'T READ!!!

Every instance of me saying "impeach" in those threds:

(1) "Republicans will never impeach."
(2) "Grounds for impeachment are political (bullshit). They're whatever Congress says they are. Basically, Congress is supposed to act as a check on the executive when they fuck up badly.
But, the Constitution sez 'treason, bribery, and high crimes and misdemeanors.'
A decent case can be made for at least two of those four, if not all four."

Every instance of me saying WW3 in those threds:

- 404 not found
So you accused him of all the reasons that are grounds for impeachment as defined by the Constitution but you didn't say impeach. And you said several things will lead to (nuclear) war with Korea but that's not WW3?

Now you are heading into HondoFS territory...
keep fuckin' that chicken
Are we in for another Sandwich meltdown?

Are you a frog?

Never mind, I know the answer

RaceBannon · May 2017

UWhuskytskeet said:

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

AZDuck said:

RaceBannon said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RaceBannon said:
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?

Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.

If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
Says the guy cheering on a politician that stifles voices with a body slam.

Actually I called the reporter a pussy but let's not quibble.

Pretty sure if Hannity got body slammed the reaction would be different here

Murdered DNC Staffer Seth Rich Shared 44,053 Democrat Emails With WikiLeaks

Comments