Question
Comments
-
LEAVE!!
...and DIAFF!! -
-
DIFF???PurpleBaze said:LEAVE!!
...and DIAFF!! -
Definitely. They actually provide content and articles you can't find here since our owner is too busy covering 15 year old boys junior varsity soccer to provide any meaningful commentary. If you like watching multiple 70 year old white men sucking each other's limp cocks however, you're probably in the right place.
-
Uh, ok. Do you guys have a chat feature? or is it just post and reply?phineas said:Definitely. They actually provide content and articles you can't find here since our owner is too busy covering 15 year old boys junior varsity soccer to provide any meaningful commentary. If you like watching multiple 70 year old white men sucking each other's limp cocks however, you're probably in the right place.
-
Kill yourself.
-
Yep. Must be a Redskin fanSwaye said:Kill yourself.
-
West Coast thing?phineas said:Definitely. They actually provide content and articles you can't find here since our owner is too busy covering 15 year old boys junior varsity soccer to provide any meaningful commentary. If you like watching multiple 70 year old white men sucking each other's limp cocks however, you're probably in the right place.
-
Dawgman is a phenomenal site, I rate it as Premium Plus +IckyBengal said:Is Dawgman worth trying? They're offering me 90 days free. Want to learn more about all these recruits you guys get out west. Looking for the next JohnRoss!!!!
While there, you can take a rusty conical cheese grater, superglue on some broken glass, mix in active HIV virus, and twist it up into your discipline hole...
-
Dawgman's CEO is one of the most wealthy and succesful real estate developers in Western Washington. They have the resources to hire top-flight analysts. This site is run by a guy who writes a monthly local sports zine in his mom's basement and tries to sneak it onto the shelves and Barnes and Noble.
It's really an apples to bananas comparison. -
And yet HH has better recruiting analysis and world class podcastsbananasnblondes said:Dawgman's CEO is one of the most wealthy and succesful real estate developers in Western Washington. They have the resources to hire top-flight analysts....
Does Dawgman even know about Stump Nostrum ?
-
It's not a basementbananasnblondes said:This site is run by a guy who writes a monthly local sports zine in his mom's basement
It's a downstairs bonus room with 70's paneling and an old stained shag carpet -
tenndawg said:
It's not a basementbananasnblondes said:This site is run by a guy who writes a monthly local sports zine in his mom's basement
It's a downstairs bonus room with 70's paneling and an old stained shag carpet
-
Signing Day Party or watching the NFL Draft ?DerekJohnson said:tenndawg said:
It's not a basementbananasnblondes said:This site is run by a guy who writes a monthly local sports zine in his mom's basement
It's a downstairs bonus room with 70's paneling and an old stained shag carpet -
DerekJohnson said:tenndawg said:
It's not a basementbananasnblondes said:This site is run by a guy who writes a monthly local sports zine in his mom's basement
It's a downstairs bonus room with 70's paneling and an old stained shag carpet
The guy on the right seriously looks like Dad#1DerekJohnson said:tenndawg said:
It's not a basementbananasnblondes said:This site is run by a guy who writes a monthly local sports zine in his mom's basement
It's a downstairs bonus room with 70's paneling and an old stained shag carpet -
Let me help you with your first Scout poast, just change a few things and you're golden:
I’ve decided to share with you this message from a guy (who shall remain anonymous) that I've interacted with over the years on the old Utezone, Utefans and here: "Just a quick personal note to say thanks for your perspectives on Utah football over the years. I haven't always agreed with you, but I've appreciated your passion for the program. I had hoped this site would be a place to have fun discussing football, but even the few promising threads ultimately devolve into insults and name calling. While I certainly don't always agree with everyone, after hanging out here for a while, the mods have a point: some of the shtick gets old after a while. The older I get, the more I judge activities by whether I enjoy them, and I simply don't enjoy having my intelligence questioned by a bunch of internet idiots. Perhaps I will catch you in the future at another site somewhere between Scout, Rivals and Utefans. Anyway, carry on the good fight and feel free to drop an email if you want to discuss Utes."
The guy that sent me this note is NO fan of Webmonky (RIP) or any of the other various internet jerks over all three sites.
Look, I'm not going to advocate for people to be censored (like the d-bags that ruined Utefans), nor am I going to lecture anybody. I will only say that this website has the opportunity to become a REAL and UNFILTERED. The problem is that a few folks on here insist on turning threads into name-calling and 8th-grade-level pissing contests, or just an opportunity to 'zing' other people.
I'll be the first to say that at times I've been guilty of that BS as well.
I guess my only suggestion is that some folks should decide if they want this to become the website that ALL OF US have described at one time or another - a place of INTELLIGENT analysis where INTENSE criticism and UNSCRIPTED opinion is welcome - or do we want Scout to be just a place of one-liners, biting insults, and contests to tear down others. I realize that it's often both, but I tend to agree with this guy that it tilts a little too much toward the latter. Plus, Dan's midnight move to Scout never sat well with me anyway.
Just a thought. Peace. Now fire away. -
Passion's message lives on89ute said:Let me help you with your first Scout poast, just change a few things and you're golden:
I’ve decided to share with you this message from a guy (who shall remain anonymous) that I've interacted with over the years on the old Utezone, Utefans and here: "Just a quick personal note to say thanks for your perspectives on Utah football over the years. I haven't always agreed with you, but I've appreciated your passion for the program. I had hoped this site would be a place to have fun discussing football, but even the few promising threads ultimately devolve into insults and name calling. While I certainly don't always agree with everyone, after hanging out here for a while, the mods have a point: some of the shtick gets old after a while. The older I get, the more I judge activities by whether I enjoy them, and I simply don't enjoy having my intelligence questioned by a bunch of internet idiots. Perhaps I will catch you in the future at another site somewhere between Scout, Rivals and Utefans. Anyway, carry on the good fight and feel free to drop an email if you want to discuss Utes."
The guy that sent me this note is NO fan of Webmonky (RIP) or any of the other various internet jerks over all three sites.
Look, I'm not going to advocate for people to be censored (like the d-bags that ruined Utefans), nor am I going to lecture anybody. I will only say that this website has the opportunity to become a REAL and UNFILTERED. The problem is that a few folks on here insist on turning threads into name-calling and 8th-grade-level pissing contests, or just an opportunity to 'zing' other people.
I'll be the first to say that at times I've been guilty of that BS as well.
I guess my only suggestion is that some folks should decide if they want this to become the website that ALL OF US have described at one time or another - a place of INTELLIGENT analysis where INTENSE criticism and UNSCRIPTED opinion is welcome - or do we want Scout to be just a place of one-liners, biting insults, and contests to tear down others. I realize that it's often both, but I tend to agree with this guy that it tilts a little too much toward the latter. Plus, Dan's midnight move to Scout never sat well with me anyway.
Just a thought. Peace. Now fire away. -
I really would like one of those 70s conversation pits in my living room.
-
Maybe Dad and Dad will let you move it upstairsPitchfork51 said:I really would like one of those 70s conversation pits in my living room.
-
It's only worth trying if Kem shows you what's in the boxIckyBengal said:Is Dawgman worth trying? They're offering me 90 days free. Want to learn more about all these recruits you guys get out west. Looking for the next JohnRoss!!!!
-
Does it make you THINK and FEEL?89ute said:Let me help you with your first Scout poast, just change a few things and you're golden:
I’ve decided to share with you this message from a guy (who shall remain anonymous) that I've interacted with over the years on the old Utezone, Utefans and here: "Just a quick personal note to say thanks for your perspectives on Utah football over the years. I haven't always agreed with you, but I've appreciated your passion for the program. I had hoped this site would be a place to have fun discussing football, but even the few promising threads ultimately devolve into insults and name calling. While I certainly don't always agree with everyone, after hanging out here for a while, the mods have a point: some of the shtick gets old after a while. The older I get, the more I judge activities by whether I enjoy them, and I simply don't enjoy having my intelligence questioned by a bunch of internet idiots. Perhaps I will catch you in the future at another site somewhere between Scout, Rivals and Utefans. Anyway, carry on the good fight and feel free to drop an email if you want to discuss Utes."
The guy that sent me this note is NO fan of Webmonky (RIP) or any of the other various internet jerks over all three sites.
Look, I'm not going to advocate for people to be censored (like the d-bags that ruined Utefans), nor am I going to lecture anybody. I will only say that this website has the opportunity to become a REAL and UNFILTERED. The problem is that a few folks on here insist on turning threads into name-calling and 8th-grade-level pissing contests, or just an opportunity to 'zing' other people.
I'll be the first to say that at times I've been guilty of that BS as well.
I guess my only suggestion is that some folks should decide if they want this to become the website that ALL OF US have described at one time or another - a place of INTELLIGENT analysis where INTENSE criticism and UNSCRIPTED opinion is welcome - or do we want Scout to be just a place of one-liners, biting insults, and contests to tear down others. I realize that it's often both, but I tend to agree with this guy that it tilts a little too much toward the latter. Plus, Dan's midnight move to Scout never sat well with me anyway.
Just a thought. Peace. Now fire away.
