Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Courteous of Trump to give Sanctuary Cities a heads up
doogie
Member Posts: 15,072
in Tug Tavern
It would be cold to simply withhold grant money without a warning first
Comments
-
Also unconstitutional.
-
According to a San Fran judge that raised over 200K for BHO anyway....UWhuskytskeet said:Also unconstitutional.
Nothing to see here move along. -
Just because one activist SF judge blocked it doesn't mean it's unconstitutional, at least yet.UWhuskytskeet said:Also unconstitutional.
Do you think that illegal immigrants that commit crimes should be allowed to stay in the country? -
It''s now unconstitutional for the President to reaffirm current federal law?
-
Yes. Read the Constitution. What a cool day when people forget about states rights.doogie said:It''s now unconstitutional for the President to reaffirm current federal law?
-
@skeets silence speaks volumes.
-
Should nuke the cities that won't comply IMO
-
GrundleStiltzkin said:
-
California is a net donator to the Fed. Or did you miss the memo?HoustonHusky said: -
Jim Crow forever!
-
Didn't see these posts when your boy Obunghole threatened state grant money and funding if states didn't toe the line on transgender bathrooms.2001400ex said:
Yes. Read the Constitution. What a cool day when people forget about states rights.doogie said:It''s now unconstitutional for the President to reaffirm current federal law?
Your comfort while squatting isn't a states rights issue? -
Trump's base live in the states that suck off the fed govt.
Sad! -
oh, oh, looks like 'somebody' doesn't know the Fed is privately owned!2001400ex said:
California is a net donator to the Fed. Or did you miss the memo?HoustonHusky said: -
Related: it looks like Hondo can't spell Feds and your reading comprehension is shit.doogie said:
oh, oh, looks like 'somebody' doesn't know the Fed is privately owned!2001400ex said:
California is a net donator to the Fed. Or did you miss the memo?HoustonHusky said: -
Wrong.gif (Tho boobs is right and you don't have a clue)doogie said:
oh, oh, looks like 'somebody' doesn't know the Fed is privately owned!2001400ex said:
California is a net donator to the Fed. Or did you miss the memo?HoustonHusky said:
The Federal Reserve Banks have an intermediate legal status, with some features of private corporations and some features of public federal agencies. The United States has an interest in the Federal Reserve Banks as tax-exempt federally created instrumentalities whose profits belong to the federal government, but this interest is not proprietary.[8] In Lewis v. United States,[9] the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit stated that: "The Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the FTCA [the Federal Tort Claims Act], but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations." The opinion went on to say, however, that: "The Reserve Banks have properly been held to be federal instrumentalities for some purposes." Another relevant decision is Scott v. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City,[8] in which the distinction is made between Federal Reserve Banks, which are federally created instrumentalities, and the Board of Governors, which is a federal agency.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Bank -
Remember when the republican party stood for local control of government? Yeah that's only when it's on issues they like. When it comes to policing and weed it's feds all the way baby
-
Local control of national immigration policy....yeah, that's always been a hallmark of the conservative movement. Brilliant.
Trying to rival HondoFS who somehow thinks linking to Wiki on an off-topic issue somehow proves a point? -
You mean like the Oregon and Washington games?BennyBeaver said:Trump's base live in the states that suck off the fed govt.
Sad! -
Except it's not local control of immigration policy. Ice is still welcome to raid just like any other city. The local police force just chooses to not turn someone over after they call to report a crime. How awfulHoustonHusky said:Local control of national immigration policy....yeah, that's always been a hallmark of the conservative movement. Brilliant.
Trying to rival HondoFS who somehow thinks linking to Wiki on an off-topic issue somehow proves a point? -
No it's "the police/sheriff refuse to turn someone over AFTER they commit a crime". Illegals are illegal. Hence the term. Just because the dem's register them to vote and that they vote for dem's is why the lib loony's give two shits except if they need a maid or gardener cheap.dhdawg said:
Except it's not local control of immigration policy. Ice is still welcome to raid just like any other city. The local police force just chooses to not turn someone over after they call to report a crime. How awfulHoustonHusky said:Local control of national immigration policy....yeah, that's always been a hallmark of the conservative movement. Brilliant.
Trying to rival HondoFS who somehow thinks linking to Wiki on an off-topic issue somehow proves a point? -
Mow your own damn lawn then!!!!dhdawg said:
Except it's not local control of immigration policy. Ice is still welcome to raid just like any other city. The local police force just chooses to not turn someone over after they call to report a crime. How awfulHoustonHusky said:Local control of national immigration policy....yeah, that's always been a hallmark of the conservative movement. Brilliant.
Trying to rival HondoFS who somehow thinks linking to Wiki on an off-topic issue somehow proves a point?
