Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Stanford's success destroys any Doog argument.

2

Comments

  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Your_Mom said:


    Your_Mom

    Pull your pants down and go hump a cactus.
  • Haid_D_Salaami
    Haid_D_Salaami Member Posts: 541
    Your_Mom said:

    Stanford plays real football... Oregon plays a blurgimmick.

    So then Sark plays a..........?


  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Your_Mom said:

    I'm glad to see that some of you guys that were humping Oregon's leg, are finally humping Stanford's leg... because now you get what some of us have been getting for a while... Stanford plays real football... Oregon plays a blurgimmick.

    10-3 Rose Bowl
    12-1 BCS Championship Game
    12-2 Rose Bowl
    12-1 Fiesta Bowl
    8-1 projected to another BCS Bowl
    2014 will be pre-season Top 5-10 depending on Mariota leaving/staying. BCS no longer exists.

    Don James went to seven BCS games in 18 years. Oregon is about to do that in seven years. If it takes 18 years "the right way" and seven years with a "gimmick" then wouldn't the gimmick be the right way, or at the very least the smart way? Stanford's Harbaugh recruited, senior laden team pushed around the much younger Ducks. We all know a rebuilding Stanford isn't going to beat an upper class filled Oregon team at Autzen next year, especially when the bulk of that rebuild will be the defense.

    How are we supposed to rate teams starting next year? If you're not in the playoffs then you're not a great team, but if you make a big time bowl game you're still not a great team. The fagmos running D-1A football need to pick a 16 team playoff, just bowl games and a free-for-all vote at the end, or get their heads cut off in the streets!
  • Your_Mom
    Your_Mom Member Posts: 393
    edited November 2013

    Your_Mom said:

    You sound angry.



    Cry me a river.

    If you read the end, more perplexed than angry.
    By the way, it isn't just a view held by Pac 12 fans....

    http://bit.ly/1a3pJ0d
  • Haid_D_Salaami
    Haid_D_Salaami Member Posts: 541
    Mosster47 said:


    10-3 Rose Bowl
    12-1 BCS Championship Game
    12-2 Rose Bowl
    12-1 Fiesta Bowl
    8-1 projected to another BCS Bowl
    2014 will be pre-season Top 5-10 depending on Mariota leaving/staying. BCS no longer exists.

    Don James went to seven BCS games in 18 years. Oregon is about to do that in seven years. If it takes 18 years "the right way" and seven years with a "gimmick" then wouldn't the gimmick be the right way, or at the very least the smart way? Stanford's Harbaugh recruited, senior laden team pushed around the much younger Ducks. We all know a rebuilding Stanford isn't going to beat an upper class filled Oregon team at Autzen next year, especially when the bulk of that rebuild will be the defense.

    How are we supposed to rate teams starting next year? If you're not in the playoffs then you're not a great team, but if you make a big time bowl game you're still not a great team. The fagmos running D-1A football need to pick a 16 team playoff, just bowl games and a free-for-all vote at the end, or get their heads cut off in the streets!

    Shhhh....don't let facts get in the way of a doog's good argument.....

  • Your_Mom
    Your_Mom Member Posts: 393

    Your_Mom said:

    Stanford plays real football... Oregon plays a blurgimmick.

    So then Sark plays a..........?


    Sark sucks. Whats your point? I'm on record saying I'd rather play Furd style than Quack style.
  • Your_Mom
    Your_Mom Member Posts: 393
    edited November 2013
    Mosster47 said:

    Your_Mom said:

    I'm glad to see that some of you guys that were humping Oregon's leg, are finally humping Stanford's leg... because now you get what some of us have been getting for a while... Stanford plays real football... Oregon plays a blurgimmick.

    Stanford's Harbaugh recruited, senior laden team pushed around the much younger Ducks.
    What was the excuse last year?

    And let it play out before you anoint the Quacks as having gone to 7 BCS bowls in 7 years. So far they've played in 4 and won 2, during a down era for the Pac. (Hi Creep).

  • unfrozencaveman
    unfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303
    So then Sark plays a..........?

    City of Torrance handmade skin fucking flute
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Your_Mom said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Your_Mom said:

    I'm glad to see that some of you guys that were humping Oregon's leg, are finally humping Stanford's leg... because now you get what some of us have been getting for a while... Stanford plays real football... Oregon plays a blurgimmick.

    Stanford's Harbaugh recruited, senior laden team pushed around the much younger Ducks.
    What was the excuse last year?

    And let it play out before you anoint the Quacks as having gone to 7 BCS bowls in 7 years. So far they've played in 4 and won 2, during a down era for the Pac. (Hi Creep).

    No excuse. Stanford feels kickers are important, Oregon feels they are not. The main theme to me was Stanford's front 7 was better than Oregon's front five. Essentially those groups were the same this year. Oregon didn't reload Alonso, Clay, Jordan, Barber, and Lyerla (blocking) as well as anyone hoped.

    Last year, 50/50. This year Stanford is flat out better. Next year should be ugly.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,098 Founders Club
    Meek said:

    I'm a pathetic Husky fan and my wife is a hardcore Cal Bear yet... we both love football and despite the emotional pain of it, we actually have Stanford season tickets because they play the kind of football we like to watch.

    Trader!