Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hardcore Husky and TSIO Podcast Exclusive: UW Athletics FInancial Forecast for 2017

1356

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,530 Standard Supporter
    Not surprising. Bull Moose doesn't have a Sugar Daddy to cover up his drunken sailor tendencies like he did at Oregon.

    Cuogs look at him like some kind of Svengali.


  • priapism
    priapism Member Posts: 2,376
    Gaye revenue from football sounds like it might lead to an NCAA violation. Please stop your reporting on it.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    We'll find out if you guys have a great coach if you have staying power. If you go right back to being the coogs, well then....
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited April 2017

    We'll find out if you guys have a great coach if you have staying power. If you go right back to being the coogs, well then....

    You just wrote that with a straight face?!?

    Oregon has a career assistant with a slightly better than .500 career record.

    Washington just played in the final four with one of the highest winning percentage coaches in the country.

    So tell me you're trying to whoosh everyone here?
    Oregon's had Chip Kelly, a duckade and several years of being a PAC 12 dynasty and two appearances in the natty within 4 years of each other. UW hasn't proven itself yet.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,530 Standard Supporter

    We'll find out if you guys have a great coach if you have staying power. If you go right back to being the coogs, well then....

    You just wrote that with a straight face?!?

    Oregon has a career assistant with a slightly better than .500 career record.

    Washington just played in the final four with one of the highest winning percentage coaches in the country.

    So tell me you're trying to whoosh everyone here?
    Oregon's had Chip Kelly, a duckade and several years of being a PAC 12 dynasty and two appearances in the natty within 4 years of each other. UW hasn't proven itself yet.
    Oregon's performance under Chip Kelly is irrelevant. He is no longer a variable in their future results.

    If he were to come back, that's a different conversation.

    But, as you can see, the UW now has the proven commodity. And Oregon has either the next Chip Kelly or the next Ty.

    And even @GrandpaSankey can see which is which.
  • Intersectional_Dawg
    Intersectional_Dawg Member Posts: 524
    *Yawn*

    Well this thread went off the rails.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    We'll find out if you guys have a great coach if you have staying power. If you go right back to being the coogs, well then....

    You just wrote that with a straight face?!?

    Oregon has a career assistant with a slightly better than .500 career record.

    Washington just played in the final four with one of the highest winning percentage coaches in the country.

    So tell me you're trying to whoosh everyone here?
    Oregon's had Chip Kelly, a duckade and several years of being a PAC 12 dynasty and two appearances in the natty within 4 years of each other. UW hasn't proven itself yet.
    Oregon's performance under Chip Kelly is irrelevant. He is no longer a variable in their future results.

    If he were to come back, that's a different conversation.

    But, as you can see, the UW now has the proven commodity. And Oregon has either the next Chip Kelly or the next Ty.

    And even @GrandpaSankey can see which is which.
    The proven commodity goes all the way to the natty and nothing less. Even better if its a win.