Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Barak Nixon headed to the gray bar hotel?

RaceBannon
RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,634 Founders Club
«134

Comments

  • AlCzervik
    AlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
  • RedRocket
    RedRocket Member Posts: 1,527
    Obama admin shouldnt be illegally spying on Trump or his aides. Trump or his aides shouldnt be illegally collaborating with the Russians. These two things aren't mutually exclusive and its fucked if either turns out to be true. This has turned into such a partisan shit show.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Except it is perfectly legal
    The intelligence is said to leave no doubt the Obama administration, in its closing days, was using the cover of legitimate surveillance on foreign targets to spy on President-elect Trump, according to sources.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,634 Founders Club
    Using the cover of legitimate surveillance to spy on a political opponent is legal.

    Awesome. Just what I would expect a libertarian to say.

    I don't think it is perfectly legal either.

    Legitimate surveillance is legal. Using it as a cover isn't

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,634 Founders Club
    RedRocket said:

    Obama admin shouldnt be illegally spying on Trump or his aides. Trump or his aides shouldnt be illegally collaborating with the Russians. These two things aren't mutually exclusive and its fucked if either turns out to be true. This has turned into such a partisan shit show.

    There is far more proof of Obama spying than there is of a Russian connection. In fact, the Russian connection is looking more and more like a cover story for the spying.

    Both are fucked if true. The worst thing is the destruction of the FBI and the intelligence agencies.

  • AlCzervik
    AlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774

    Except it is perfectly legal
    The intelligence is said to leave no doubt the Obama administration, in its closing days, was using the cover of legitimate surveillance on foreign targets to spy on President-elect Trump, according to sources.

    Using the cover of legitimate surveillance to spy on a political opponent is legal.

    Awesome. Just what I would expect a libertarian to say.

    I don't think it is perfectly legal either.

    Legitimate surveillance is legal. Using it as a cover isn't

    image

    Sad.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,634 Founders Club
    AlCzervik said:

    Except it is perfectly legal
    The intelligence is said to leave no doubt the Obama administration, in its closing days, was using the cover of legitimate surveillance on foreign targets to spy on President-elect Trump, according to sources.

    Using the cover of legitimate surveillance to spy on a political opponent is legal.

    Awesome. Just what I would expect a libertarian to say.

    I don't think it is perfectly legal either.

    Legitimate surveillance is legal. Using it as a cover isn't

    image

    Sad.
    It is every bit as BIG an article as the CNN one you linked yesterday

    Bigger!
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,634 Founders Club
    People want to know if their former President is a crook. Well

    image
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    People want to know if their former President is a crook. Well

    image

    Trump is a fucking pussy. So are you.