The character of oregon's team, or lack thereof.

Southerndawg said:

Passion said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

Passion said:

After thinking about the images from last night's game, my opinion or oregon is pretty firm.

1) They're so arrogant that they won't take 3 points in the red zone. They just assume they're going to convert on 4th down so they go for it. I've criticized Sark for this cavalier and un-James like approach to football, and oregon deserves the same criticism. When you're playing a great defense like stanford, you don't take scoring position for granted, especially considering that stanford doesn't have a high-powered offense. 3 points matters, dipshits.

2) huff crying tells me that they're soft. I've seen a lot of teams lose this year and over the past several years. Sure, huff's emotion shows that he cares. Fine. But there's an old boxer's adage that the character of a fighter is not shown when he is kicking the shit out of somebody else (as oregon often does). Rather, it's when somebody is kicking the shit out of him. huff is a big grandstander and likes to showboat after touchdowns. So how does he compose himself when he is on the other end of the beating? He sits on the bench with his head in his hands, and then he cries.

3) deanthony thomas laughing on the sidelines tells me they're devoid of character and unity. Even the ESPN crew talked about this. While huff is sobbing, dat is acting like he's hanging out with friends at a high school dance. Not a care in the world. Pretty shitty.

They're arrogant, soft, and devoid of character and unity. Sure they're all full of shits and giggles when they're beating people, but this is their behavior when things don't go their way.

Whatever, it's oregon. I'm not surprised.

Your analysis is pedestrian, but that's to be expected, because it's you. Is it really because they're so 'arrogant' or is it because it's just a strategy of their game? You also forgot that Oregon has a shitty field goal kicker. There is little doubt this plays into it.

Huff crying only tells me he's passionate about the game and doesn't like to lose. You're probably one of those assholes that tells your kids (if you've got any) that it's not ok to cry or to 'be soft,' and by doing so perpetuate the fallacy that it's not ok to cry or show any emotion if you're a man. Your male children will end up emotionally stunted and unable to deal with the shit life throws at them.

I agree that Thomas is arrogant and he should shut his fucking hole before the game. Don't talk big if you show up playing like a pansy.

My "male children" will be "emotionally stunted?" You sound like kim grinolds when somebody criticizes Sark. Go ahead and attack the person expressing the opinion, kimmy boy. Even the ESPN d-bags saw the same things I did. Will their children me "unable to deal with the shit life throws at them?"

Whatever. I'm right, and you know it. Your program has always lacked class. oregon has a ton of talent. Nobody can deny that. But it's built on glitz, cockiness, and smoke-and-mirrors. On top of it, your fans are complete trash (as a former oregon player basically said).

When stanford lost to Utah this year, they didn't act like your guys did last night. I'm no stanford fan, but it's the truth.

This year we're hearing, it was the refs, more what ifs, and more quack quack quack from dooks.

Southerndawg said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

Southerndawg said:

Passion said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

Passion said:

After thinking about the images from last night's game, my opinion or oregon is pretty firm.

1) They're so arrogant that they won't take 3 points in the red zone. They just assume they're going to convert on 4th down so they go for it. I've criticized Sark for this cavalier and un-James like approach to football, and oregon deserves the same criticism. When you're playing a great defense like stanford, you don't take scoring position for granted, especially considering that stanford doesn't have a high-powered offense. 3 points matters, dipshits.

2) huff crying tells me that they're soft. I've seen a lot of teams lose this year and over the past several years. Sure, huff's emotion shows that he cares. Fine. But there's an old boxer's adage that the character of a fighter is not shown when he is kicking the shit out of somebody else (as oregon often does). Rather, it's when somebody is kicking the shit out of him. huff is a big grandstander and likes to showboat after touchdowns. So how does he compose himself when he is on the other end of the beating? He sits on the bench with his head in his hands, and then he cries.

3) deanthony thomas laughing on the sidelines tells me they're devoid of character and unity. Even the ESPN crew talked about this. While huff is sobbing, dat is acting like he's hanging out with friends at a high school dance. Not a care in the world. Pretty shitty.

They're arrogant, soft, and devoid of character and unity. Sure they're all full of shits and giggles when they're beating people, but this is their behavior when things don't go their way.

Whatever, it's oregon. I'm not surprised.

Your analysis is pedestrian, but that's to be expected, because it's you. Is it really because they're so 'arrogant' or is it because it's just a strategy of their game? You also forgot that Oregon has a shitty field goal kicker. There is little doubt this plays into it.

Huff crying only tells me he's passionate about the game and doesn't like to lose. You're probably one of those assholes that tells your kids (if you've got any) that it's not ok to cry or to 'be soft,' and by doing so perpetuate the fallacy that it's not ok to cry or show any emotion if you're a man. Your male children will end up emotionally stunted and unable to deal with the shit life throws at them.

I agree that Thomas is arrogant and he should shut his fucking hole before the game. Don't talk big if you show up playing like a pansy.

My "male children" will be "emotionally stunted?" You sound like kim grinolds when somebody criticizes Sark. Go ahead and attack the person expressing the opinion, kimmy boy. Even the ESPN d-bags saw the same things I did. Will their children me "unable to deal with the shit life throws at them?"

Whatever. I'm right, and you know it. Your program has always lacked class. oregon has a ton of talent. Nobody can deny that. But it's built on glitz, cockiness, and smoke-and-mirrors. On top of it, your fans are complete trash (as a former oregon player basically said).

When stanford lost to Utah this year, they didn't act like your guys did last night. I'm no stanford fan, but it's the truth.

This year we're hearing, it was the refs, more what ifs, and more quack quack quack from dooks.

This kind of gay ass shit is why we have a problem with Pac 12 refs: One year it's a fluke. 2 years its become a problem. It's understandable that you Arizona St. fuckbags don't have a problem with it because you were the beneficiary of their blatant fucking idiocy during the Wisconsin game, getting a win you didn't deserve.

Stanford physically handled Kelly's ducks last year in Autzen.