Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump impeachment

2001400ex
2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
in Tug Tavern
I still don't think it'll happen. But it is surprising the number of Republicans speaking against Trump. If Clinton was impeached (not confirmed) for lying about his cigar placement. Imagine Trump under oath.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-committee-wants-evidence-trumps-wiretap-claim-070320519--politics.html
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    edited March 2017
    Can't happen soon enough. Fucking clown.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    DerekJohnson said:

    2001400ex said:

    I still don't think it'll happen. But it is surprising the number of Republicans speaking against Trump. If Clinton was impeached (not confirmed) for lying about his cigar placement. Imagine Trump under oath.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-committee-wants-evidence-trumps-wiretap-claim-070320519--politics.html

    Clinton was impeached for lying under oath.
    Yes. Read my comment again....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    I still don't think it'll happen. But it is surprising the number of Republicans speaking against Trump. If Clinton was impeached (not confirmed) for lying about his cigar placement. Imagine Trump under oath.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-committee-wants-evidence-trumps-wiretap-claim-070320519--politics.html

    *not convicted. Clinton was indicted (impeached) on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice, the senate didn't have the stones to convict so he walked ... into disbarment among other things.

    Regarding Trump, you can continue to imagine with glee that Trump has been brought before a grand jury, commenced to commit perjury, and in concert, turned goons loose on his accusers in an attempt to have evidence against him withheld or squashed through intimidation ...... or live in the real world understanding that Clinton actually did those things.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Southerndawg said:

    2001400ex said:

    I still don't think it'll happen. But it is surprising the number of Republicans speaking against Trump. If Clinton was impeached (not confirmed) for lying about his cigar placement. Imagine Trump under oath.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-committee-wants-evidence-trumps-wiretap-claim-070320519--politics.html

    *not convicted. Clinton was indicted (impeached) on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice, the senate didn't have the stones to convict so he walked ... into disbarment among other things.

    Regarding Trump, you can continue to imagine with glee that Trump has been brought before a grand jury, commenced to commit perjury, and in concert, turned goons loose on his accusers in an attempt to have evidence against him withheld or squashed through intimidation ...... or live in the real world understanding that Clinton actually did those things.
    You don't have to go to a grand jury to be under oath. HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    trump just had 38 trademarks approved in china.

    the guy is corrupt as fuck and doesn't hide it. and things are pointing towards some sort of a business deal he made with Russia.
    he wont last
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    doogie said:

    I heard Trump arranged a US/ Russia uranium sale after Russia made contributions to the Trump family Trust. Somebody should look into that.

    and she isn't the president of the united states. she's not even relevant in the party period anymore. great red herring
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    sure.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    doogie said:

    I heard Trump arranged a US/ Russia uranium sale after Russia made contributions to the Trump family Trust. Somebody should look into that.

    Head. Buried. In. Sand
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    doogie said:

    Im just thankful that shrill bitch Russian agent never became President and America has been saved from surrender.

    That extra $54 billion for the military sure will help. Since we are gutting the EPA, I look forward to lighting rivers on fire again and ending the suffering by the wealthy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    2001400ex said:

    doogie said:

    Im just thankful that shrill bitch Russian agent never became President and America has been saved from surrender.

    That extra $54 billion for the military sure will help. Since we are gutting the EPA, I look forward to lighting rivers on fire again and ending the suffering by the wealthy.
    and gutting the NOAA so we can be prepared for hurricanes just like bush was for katrina
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    2001400ex said:

    doogie said:

    Im just thankful that shrill bitch Russian agent never became President and America has been saved from surrender.

    That extra $54 billion for the military sure will help. Since we are gutting the EPA, I look forward to lighting rivers on fire again and ending the suffering by the wealthy.
    Maybe the EPA can turn another river orange and lie about it?

    Way to little of the EPA focus is on actual pollution right now...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    dhdawg said:

    2001400ex said:

    doogie said:

    Im just thankful that shrill bitch Russian agent never became President and America has been saved from surrender.

    That extra $54 billion for the military sure will help. Since we are gutting the EPA, I look forward to lighting rivers on fire again and ending the suffering by the wealthy.
    and gutting the NOAA so we can be prepared for hurricanes just like bush was for katrina
    There is a whole lot of stupid in this statement...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    HoustonHusky said:

    dhdawg said:

    2001400ex said:

    doogie said:

    Im just thankful that shrill bitch Russian agent never became President and America has been saved from surrender.

    That extra $54 billion for the military sure will help. Since we are gutting the EPA, I look forward to lighting rivers on fire again and ending the suffering by the wealthy.
    and gutting the NOAA so we can be prepared for hurricanes just like bush was for katrina
    There is a whole lot of stupid in this thread...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,468 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    2001400ex said:

    I still don't think it'll happen. But it is surprising the number of Republicans speaking against Trump. If Clinton was impeached (not confirmed) for lying about his cigar placement. Imagine Trump under oath.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-committee-wants-evidence-trumps-wiretap-claim-070320519--politics.html

    Clinton was impeached for lying under oath.
    Yes. Read my comment again....
    It's hard.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    doogie said:

    Im just thankful that shrill bitch Russian agent never became President and America has been saved from surrender.

    That extra $54 billion for the military sure will help. Since we are gutting the EPA, I look forward to lighting rivers on fire again and ending the suffering by the wealthy.
    Maybe the EPA can turn another river orange and lie about it?

    Way to little of the EPA focus is on actual pollution right now...
    so the answer is to eliminate it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    doogie said:

    I heard Trump arranged a US/ Russia uranium sale after Russia made contributions to the Trump family Trust. Somebody should look into that.

    "It's Bush's fault!!"

    Kill yourself.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,792 Standard Supporter
    dhdawg said:

    doogie said:

    I heard Trump arranged a US/ Russia uranium sale after Russia made contributions to the Trump family Trust. Somebody should look into that.

    and she isn't the president of the united states. she's not even relevant in the party period anymore. great red herring
    She was the fucking secretary of state at the time! Amazing how you loonies ignore all the crimes of the Clinton's and Obozo's.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    doogie said:

    I heard Trump arranged a US/ Russia uranium sale after Russia made contributions to the Trump family Trust. Somebody should look into that.

    and she isn't the president of the united states. she's not even relevant in the party period anymore. great red herring
    She was the fucking secretary of state at the time! Amazing how you loonies ignore all the crimes of the Clinton's and Obozo's.
    Crimes require trials and convictions.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,792 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2017
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    doogie said:

    I heard Trump arranged a US/ Russia uranium sale after Russia made contributions to the Trump family Trust. Somebody should look into that.

    and she isn't the president of the united states. she's not even relevant in the party period anymore. great red herring
    She was the fucking secretary of state at the time! Amazing how you loonies ignore all the crimes of the Clinton's and Obozo's.
    Crimes require trials and convictions.
    No they don't. They require the commission. Prosecution, as we have seen, can be politically affected.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    doogie said:

    I heard Trump arranged a US/ Russia uranium sale after Russia made contributions to the Trump family Trust. Somebody should look into that.

    and she isn't the president of the united states. she's not even relevant in the party period anymore. great red herring
    She was the fucking secretary of state at the time! Amazing how you loonies ignore all the crimes of the Clinton's and Obozo's.
    Crimes require trials and convictions.
    Wrong, but consistent with the Clinton's ideology. It's not a crime if you're not caught, tried and convicted.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Southerndawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Sledog said:

    dhdawg said:

    doogie said:

    I heard Trump arranged a US/ Russia uranium sale after Russia made contributions to the Trump family Trust. Somebody should look into that.

    and she isn't the president of the united states. she's not even relevant in the party period anymore. great red herring
    She was the fucking secretary of state at the time! Amazing how you loonies ignore all the crimes of the Clinton's and Obozo's.
    Crimes require trials and convictions.
    Wrong, but consistent with the Clinton's ideology. It's not a crime if you're not caught, tried and convicted.
    I think that's written in the Constitution.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    2001400ex said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    2001400ex said:

    I still don't think it'll happen. But it is surprising the number of Republicans speaking against Trump. If Clinton was impeached (not confirmed) for lying about his cigar placement. Imagine Trump under oath.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-committee-wants-evidence-trumps-wiretap-claim-070320519--politics.html

    Clinton was impeached for lying under oath.
    Yes. Read my comment again....
    Fuck off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    dhdawg said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    doogie said:

    Im just thankful that shrill bitch Russian agent never became President and America has been saved from surrender.

    That extra $54 billion for the military sure will help. Since we are gutting the EPA, I look forward to lighting rivers on fire again and ending the suffering by the wealthy.
    Maybe the EPA can turn another river orange and lie about it?

    Way to little of the EPA focus is on actual pollution right now...
    so the answer is to eliminate it.
    That's a complete non sequitur.

    Cutting the budget of things that the EPA shouldn't be doing in the first place doesn't say anything about what happens to the things the EPA should be doing. If it is an across-the-board cut that is one thing, but if its a cut and elimination of sub-sections (as has been rumored) then your "point" is completely useless.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    HoustonHusky said:

    dhdawg said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    doogie said:

    Im just thankful that shrill bitch Russian agent never became President and America has been saved from surrender.

    That extra $54 billion for the military sure will help. Since we are gutting the EPA, I look forward to lighting rivers on fire again and ending the suffering by the wealthy.
    Maybe the EPA can turn another river orange and lie about it?

    Way to little of the EPA focus is on actual pollution right now...
    so the answer is to eliminate it.
    That's a complete non sequitur.

    Cutting the budget of things that the EPA shouldn't be doing in the first place doesn't say anything about what happens to the things the EPA should be doing. If it is an across-the-board cut that is one thing, but if its a cut and elimination of sub-sections (as has been rumored) then your "point" is completely useless.
    Making it more effecient is one thing. Trump and his big oil stooge Pruitt are against the environment and the agency as a whole
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    so, you've jumped back onto the Oil Is Evil bandwagon again?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    doogie said:

    so, you've jumped back onto the Oil Is Evil bandwagon again?

    When they buy off the gov't yes
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter