Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
2016 UW vs 2000 UW
Comments
-
2016 team
Well playedazumah said:
They did, but they were still probably the best team in Indiana.Gladstone said:
The 2000 Notre Dame team sucked.YellowSnow said:
2000 team didn't even win the conference outright; it was a 3 way tie. Bowl wins over Purdue aren't very tuff. Beavers bowl win in 2000 was a lot more impressive than ours. Props to Babushka.PurpleJ said:2016 team didn't even win a bowl game!
-
2016 team2016 D puts them over the top.
-
2000 team2016 would win but Tui vs Browning made me say 2000.
-
2016 team
Head says 2016 but heart says 2000. The latter is probably my all time favorite UW team and the only good team of my youth, with Tui being my favorite player. But...Ross. Pettis. Adams. McGary. Eldrenkamp. Gaines. Virtaz0r. Mathis. Qualls. Bierria. Victor. Budda. SMFJ. LAN. Taylor "Bruce Lee" Rapp.dnc said:
I know it's your pole, but stillGladstone said:
The 2000 Notre Dame team sucked.YellowSnow said:
2000 team didn't even win the conference outright; it was a 3 way tie. Bowl wins over Purdue aren't very tuff. Beavers bowl win in 2000 was a lot more impressive than ours. Props to Babushka.PurpleJ said:2016 team didn't even win a bowl game!
-
Browning is irreparably damaged by getting curb stomped by Miami in 2000. 2000 played a better schedule in a better Pac without Utah and Colorado who Tui beat as a non conference foeYellowSnow said:
Tui better clutch QB (at least, 2 years into Browning's career) but there are some things that Browning does better. 2000 team was lucky to go 11-1. The 2016 team would have gone undefeated that year with few close games and completely destroyed Purdue in the Rose Bowl. Pete > Rick and not even close.RaceBannon said:Tui beats Brownshorts rather easily
-
Like anticipating the quick crosser and executing the under thrown play action pass???YellowSnow said:
Tui better clutch QB (at least, 2 years into Browning's career) but there are some things that Browning does better. 2000 team was lucky to go 11-1. The 2016 team would have gone undefeated that year with few close games and completely destroyed Purdue in the Rose Bowl. Pete > Rick and not even close.RaceBannon said:Tui beats Brownshorts rather easily
-
2000 team
The 2000 team has at least three wins that are better than any of the 2016 team's wins.RaceBannon said:
Browning is irreparably damaged by getting curb stomped by Miami in 2000. 2000 played a better schedule in a better Pac without Utah and Colorado who Tui beat as a non conference foeYellowSnow said:
Tui better clutch QB (at least, 2 years into Browning's career) but there are some things that Browning does better. 2000 team was lucky to go 11-1. The 2016 team would have gone undefeated that year with few close games and completely destroyed Purdue in the Rose Bowl. Pete > Rick and not even close.RaceBannon said:Tui beats Brownshorts rather easily
-
2016 teamCoach Pete >> Slick.
-
2016 team
Fuuuuuuuck. This just made me wonder if Wiin is an alt for Creepy. That would suck, because Wiin posts some good shit.BearsWiin said:Miami
-
piling on, but fuck notre dame, they aint been shit since '93.Gladstone said:
The 2000 Notre Dame team sucked.
-
2016 team
No, like completing 62% of his passes last year vs Tui completing 52% of his as a senior (2000). Or Jake throwing 43 TDs against 9 picks (as Sophomore) vs Tui throwing 14 TDs with 9 picks in the 2000 season. In the short to medium range game, Jake is more accurate than Tui was and it's not even close. But against a team like Bama last year, I'd take Tui over Jake. Tui better at improvising and dealing with a dirty pocket.salemcoog said:
Like anticipating the quick crosser and executing the under thrown play action pass???YellowSnow said:
Tui better clutch QB (at least, 2 years into Browning's career) but there are some things that Browning does better. 2000 team was lucky to go 11-1. The 2016 team would have gone undefeated that year with few close games and completely destroyed Purdue in the Rose Bowl. Pete > Rick and not even close.RaceBannon said:Tui beats Brownshorts rather easily
-
2016 team
I don't buy that. The team that showed up Friday night on ESPN to curb stomp the Trees could probably have beat that 2000 Miami squad at home.RaceBannon said:
Browning is irreparably damaged by getting curb stomped by Miami in 2000. 2000 played a better schedule in a better Pac without Utah and Colorado who Tui beat as a non conference foeYellowSnow said:
Tui better clutch QB (at least, 2 years into Browning's career) but there are some things that Browning does better. 2000 team was lucky to go 11-1. The 2016 team would have gone undefeated that year with few close games and completely destroyed Purdue in the Rose Bowl. Pete > Rick and not even close.RaceBannon said:Tui beats Brownshorts rather easily
Allow me to axe you this: Let's say the 2000 team never plays Miami at home early in the year, but instead gets them in a big time bowl in the deep south - what do you think the score would have looked like? In other words would it be closer to us losing 24- 7 or 17- 7 or more like 65- 7? -
2016 teamrodmansrage said:
piling on, but fuck notre dame, they aint been shit since Lou Holtz suffered his first stroke in '93.Gladstone said:
The 2000 Notre Dame team sucked. -
I hated both teams. I'm a quook. Fuck off.
-
2016 team
Louis Prima: With all the great players playing ball right now, how well do you think you would do against today's pitchers?HuskyJW said:
I know you are being sarcastic but the guys from 2000 are in their mid to late 30's now. Have they even lifted or worked out since then? No way could Tui run away from BierriaTierbsHsotBoobs said:
This is why 2000 wins rather easily, say 34-17?dnc said:2016 would put the 2000 team away before they showed up after halftime. 2016 was better at probably 9 positions on defense and most of the skill positions. OL was about even. 2000 was better at QB, TE and not having Psalm. That's about it.
2016 rather easily.
Ty Cobb: Well, I figure against today's pitchers I'd only probably hit about .290
Louis Prima: .290? Well that's amazing, because you batted over .400 a... a whole bunch of times. Now tell us all, we'd all like to know, why do you think you'd only hit .290?
Ty Cobb: Well, I'm 72 fucking years old you ignorant son of a bitch. -
2000 teamOne team beat #2 and #4. Lost to #7.
One team lost to #2 and #3 and beat some teams ranked over 10.
But 2016 is better cause John Ross is fast and Brownsocks threw a bunch of TDs against hot garbage defenses ZOMG -
2016 team
This. The 2000 team did beat Miami though. They weren't that great though. The 2016 team was a lot more consistent and had better talent.dnc said:2016 would put the 2000 team away before they showed up after halftime. 2016 was better at probably 9 positions on defense and most of the skill positions. OL was about even. 2000 was better at QB, TE and not having Psalm. That's about it.
2016 rather easily. -
2016 team
Only doogs make it all about the offense.whlinder said:One team beat #2 and #4. Lost to #7.
One team lost to #2 and #3 and beat some teams ranked over 10.
But 2016 is better cause John Ross is fast and Brownsocks threw a bunch of TDs against hot garbage defenses ZOMG
2016 defense >>>>>>>> 2000 defense. That's why they'd win. -
2016 teamAgain, it would not be close.
-
2000 team
It's easy to be consistent when you play dogshit every week.RoadDawg55 said:
This. The 2000 team did beat Miami though. They weren't that great though. The 2016 team was a lot more consistent and had better talent.dnc said:2016 would put the 2000 team away before they showed up after halftime. 2016 was better at probably 9 positions on defense and most of the skill positions. OL was about even. 2000 was better at QB, TE and not having Psalm. That's about it.
2016 rather easily. -
2016 team
Great point. In a bowl game Miami would have named the score on the 2000 team in a rematch or if they were meeting for the first time that year.YellowSnow said:
I don't buy that. The team that showed up Friday night on ESPN to curb stomp the Trees could probably have beat that 2000 Miami squad at home.RaceBannon said:
Browning is irreparably damaged by getting curb stomped by Miami in 2000. 2000 played a better schedule in a better Pac without Utah and Colorado who Tui beat as a non conference foeYellowSnow said:
Tui better clutch QB (at least, 2 years into Browning's career) but there are some things that Browning does better. 2000 team was lucky to go 11-1. The 2016 team would have gone undefeated that year with few close games and completely destroyed Purdue in the Rose Bowl. Pete > Rick and not even close.RaceBannon said:Tui beats Brownshorts rather easily
Allow me to axe you this: Let's say the 2000 team never plays Miami at home early in the year, but instead gets them in a big time bowl in the deep south - what do you think the score would have looked like? In other words would it be closer to us losing 24- 7 or 17- 7 or more like 65- 7?
2016 Defense doesn't allow that to happen even if offense is anemic just like we were against Bama.
Tui was a warrior, but the 2000 team isn't hanging with last year dawgs -
The 2000 Dawgs weren't great from top to bottom. But they had a great, and senior-laden, OL. Much better up front than 2016. Not close.dnc said: -
Let me put it this way: Trade OLs, and UW wins the Peach Bowl.
-
In men's basketball both teams would find a way to lose to each other...
-
2016 team
I was just fucking with J when I said 2016 is greater, but I do think they're basically even. 2000 is remembered very fondly but I think it was a good line that is overrated based on two things: the option made it look better than it was, and the ensuing dreck OL's made it look better than it was.TTJ said:
2000 was a very good OL, not a great one. Just like 2016. -
2016 teamOne huge reason 2016 wins this gayme rather easily.
Turnover margin vs Pac12 opponents (since 2000 clearly paid a tougher non con): 2016 + 13, 2000 (-3).
2016 takes the ball away at least two more times against 2000. Ballgame.
-
2016 team
Agreed. 2000 was better in the trenches on both sides of the ball. 2016 was basically better everywhere else though.TTJ said:Let me put it this way: Trade OLs, and UW wins the Peach Bowl.
-
2016 team
Probably something like 34-17 MiamiYellowSnow said:
I don't buy that. The team that showed up Friday night on ESPN to curb stomp the Trees could probably have beat that 2000 Miami squad at home.RaceBannon said:
Browning is irreparably damaged by getting curb stomped by Miami in 2000. 2000 played a better schedule in a better Pac without Utah and Colorado who Tui beat as a non conference foeYellowSnow said:
Tui better clutch QB (at least, 2 years into Browning's career) but there are some things that Browning does better. 2000 team was lucky to go 11-1. The 2016 team would have gone undefeated that year with few close games and completely destroyed Purdue in the Rose Bowl. Pete > Rick and not even close.RaceBannon said:Tui beats Brownshorts rather easily
Allow me to axe you this: Let's say the 2000 team never plays Miami at home early in the year, but instead gets them in a big time bowl in the deep south - what do you think the score would have looked like? In other words would it be closer to us losing 24- 7 or 17- 7 or more like 65- 7? -
2016 team
The 2000 OL was nowhere near beat BAMA good.TTJ said:Let me put it this way: Trade OLs, and UW wins the Peach Bowl.
