2016 UW vs 2000 UW
2016 UW vs 2000 UW 64 votes
10 votes
54 votes
Comments
-
2000 teamI don't know who would win so I voted for my favorite team.
-
2016 team2016 would put the 2000 team away before they showed up after halftime. 2016 was better at probably 9 positions on defense and most of the skill positions. OL was about even. 2000 was better at QB, TE and not having Psalm. That's about it.
2016 rather easily. -
2000 teamTui
-
2000 team2016 had more talent than 2000 team.
2000 team beat the U who had more talent than any team since except for 2001/2 U.
Ergo, 2000 team finds a way to win. -
2016 team2016 wins rather easily...say 34-17?
-
2016 team
2000 wouldn't have home field advantage on 2016whlinder said:2016 had more talent than 2000 team.
2000 team beat the U who had more talent than any team since except for 2001/2 U.
Ergo, 2000 team finds a way to win. -
Tui beats Brownshorts rather easily
-
2016 team
Tui better clutch QB (at least, 2 years into Browning's career) but there are some things that Browning does better. 2000 team was lucky to go 11-1. The 2016 team would have gone undefeated that year with few close games and completely destroyed Purdue in the Rose Bowl. Pete > Rick and not even close.RaceBannon said:Tui beats Brownshorts rather easily
-
2000 team
This is why 2000 wins rather easily, say 34-17?dnc said:2016 would put the 2000 team away before they showed up after halftime. 2016 was better at probably 9 positions on defense and most of the skill positions. OL was about even. 2000 was better at QB, TE and not having Psalm. That's about it.
2016 rather easily. -
2000 team2008 owns these two pretenders.
-
2000 teamdnc saying the OL is even is LOL funny
-
2016 teamNot even a close game.
-
2016 team2016 team by 2 scores
-
2016 team
I know you are being sarcastic but the guys from 2000 are in their mid to late 30's now. Have they even lifted or worked out since then? No way could Tui run away from BierriaTierbsHsotBoobs said:
This is why 2000 wins rather easily, say 34-17?dnc said:2016 would put the 2000 team away before they showed up after halftime. 2016 was better at probably 9 positions on defense and most of the skill positions. OL was about even. 2000 was better at QB, TE and not having Psalm. That's about it.
2016 rather easily. -
2016 teamAll other things being equal the answer is always the modern team that had better training, coaching, and strategy beating the team from a previous era.
And things weren't equal to begin with.
2016 and it isn't close. -
Miami
-
2016 team
The cancer.BearsWiin said:Miami
-
2016 team2000 team had 5 dudes get drafted. Tui in the 2nd round, plus 4 other guys in rounds 5 and beyond. The overall talent gap going by future NFL dudes is pretty significant.
-
2016 teamAccording the national media, however, the 2000 team was far better than the 2016 squad because they had a TUFF non conference schedule.
-
2000 team2016 team didn't even win a bowl game!
-
-
2016 team
2000 team didn't even win the conference outright; it was a 3 way tie. Bowl wins over Purdue aren't very tuff. Beavers bowl win in 2000 was a lot more impressive than ours. Props to Babushka.PurpleJ said:2016 team didn't even win a bowl game!
-
2016 team
2016 would destroy 2000 Purdue.PurpleJ said:2016 team didn't even win a bowl game!
Stop pressing. -
2016 team
The 2000 Notre Dame team sucked.YellowSnow said:
2000 team didn't even win the conference outright; it was a 3 way tie. Bowl wins over Purdue aren't very tuff. Beavers bowl win in 2000 was a lot more impressive than ours. Props to Babushka.PurpleJ said:2016 team didn't even win a bowl game!
-
2016 team
I know it's your pole, but stillGladstone said:
The 2000 Notre Dame team sucked.YellowSnow said:
2000 team didn't even win the conference outright; it was a 3 way tie. Bowl wins over Purdue aren't very tuff. Beavers bowl win in 2000 was a lot more impressive than ours. Props to Babushka.PurpleJ said:2016 team didn't even win a bowl game!
-
-
2000 team
Beat Creep's Canes in September at home and then pop off!YellowSnow said:
2000 team didn't even win the conference outright; it was a 3 way tie. Bowl wins over Purdue aren't very tuff. Beavers bowl win in 2000 was a lot more impressive than ours. Props to Babushka.PurpleJ said:2016 team didn't even win a bowl game!
-
2000 teamPumpy triple post...
The only correct answer to this thread is "IDDIH" -
2016 team
They did, but they were still probably the best team in Indiana.Gladstone said:
The 2000 Notre Dame team sucked.YellowSnow said:
2000 team didn't even win the conference outright; it was a 3 way tie. Bowl wins over Purdue aren't very tuff. Beavers bowl win in 2000 was a lot more impressive than ours. Props to Babushka.PurpleJ said:2016 team didn't even win a bowl game!
