Pat Robertson has a message for you Trump ball lickers

oregonblitzkrieg said:

dnc said:

2001400ex said:

dnc said:

2001400ex said:

TurdBuffer said:

2001400ex said:

TurdBuffer said:

2001400ex said:

TurdBuffer said:

Still waiting, Hondo.

I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.

You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.

To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.

The obsession continues.

But I'll bite. What should we do.

Honestly?

Right. Jesus would want that in his name.

So you're saying we?re a Christian nation?

Turdfucker is the one on the religious kick. No, we aren't a Christian nation, but someone else thinks different.

George Bush has claimed he was on a mission from God when he launched the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, according to a senior Palestinian politician in an interview to be broadcast by the BBC later this month.
Mr Bush revealed the extent of his religious fervour when he met a Palestinian delegation during the Israeli-Palestinian summit at the Egpytian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, four months after the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

One of the delegates, Nabil Shaath, who was Palestinian foreign minister at the time, said: "President Bush said to all of us: 'I am driven with a mission from God'. God would tell me, 'George go and fight these terrorists in Afghanistan'. And I did. And then God would tell me 'George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq'. And I did."

Mr Bush went on: "And now, again, I feel God's words coming to me, 'Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East'. And, by God, I'm gonna do it."

A senior Palestinian terrorist in an interview to be broadcast by the BBC later this month is your source?

Palestian politicians = terrorists in suits

American colonists in goofy wigs used to be called "terrorists" too.

2001400ex said:

TurdBuffer said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

TurdBuffer said:

Still waiting, Hondo.

I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.

You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.

To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.

@turdfucker I answered your question here. I'll your again slowly so you'll maybe understand. It's not the religion that's the issue. The issue is shitty cultures that the religion can be found in. Like Trump's Muslim ban, why was it only from 7 specific counties? You hate Muslims cause of rape and 9/11, but you are OK with Russia legalized beating of the wife and don't give a shit about Saudi Arabia.

We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.

Nope. Don't hate all muslims, but you Libs love your hyperbole. Relax kid, you don't threaten anyone.

Once again, (for the 3rd or 4th time), the question I posed was why the 95% plus peace-loving muslims cannot eradicate the 5% or less radical muslims in their midst. You say it has nothing to do with the muslim religion. I say it has everything to do with their religion. What else binds them all in common interest stronger than that? What is the most important institution in those shitty countries and communities, Hondo? The Mosque. And you know it. It's not the police station, school or post office.

I'm glad we agree that bombing ISIS targets is legit, but all your after-the-fact bitching about collateral damage undermines your support for that, so you really are talking from both sides of your mouth on that. OK. No biggie. Nothing new here.

But you still haven't answered the question, Hondo. I'll take "shitty cultures" as an outright admission that the West is heads and tails better than those shitty muslim ones you cite in your argument. And while nobody holds you accountable for every asshole who stones his own daughter to death or cuts of the head of his neighbor, the cutesy "What about Russia(?)" bullshit is just tired, lazy, feeble, and not the issue. And you know it.

I have said nothing about collateral damage. And you are so blinded by the Muslim hysteria that you can't even comprehend what I'm saying. And it has nothing to do with culture of the West being better, look at India. Not to mention our own crime rate is much higher than it should be.And Mexico's culture isn't much better than the middle East. I suppose Muslims are too blame there too?

Hondo, I ask you to stick to the issue and stop jumping all over the map, and you respond by using a bigger map.

You clearly prefer to spew classic reactionary, distracting rhetoric instead of trying to answer the larger questions about solutions. In so doing, you mimic the problems of the Middle East and failed states in general, which is to bitch, complain, burn buildings and blow shit up, then wonder why their shitty cultures and countries can't progress from their third-world status.

You're great at spinning wheels and making smoke, Hondo. But really quite bad at proposing any solutions or explaining what you suggest would be a better solution to the Islamic Terrorism problem worldwide, however small you believe it is. It remains a potent threat so long as money flows to it's various causes and rival groups throughout the Arab world and Middle East, which means the US will continue to kill people in its efforts to control and diminish the threat, giving people like yourself a steady stream of news stories to bitch about and justify muslim terrorism with, with no end in sight. It's the failure of your type of thinking that keeps this problem alive and turns it into a simple numbers game of risk elimination. Reform is the only answer, not ignoring the problem until it lands on the US doorstep again. Been there, done that. Not gonna happen again.

2001400ex said:

TurdBuffer said:

2001400ex said:

TurdBuffer said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

TurdBuffer said:

Still waiting, Hondo.

I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.

You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.

To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.

@turdfucker I answered your question here. I'll your again slowly so you'll maybe understand. It's not the religion that's the issue. The issue is shitty cultures that the religion can be found in. Like Trump's Muslim ban, why was it only from 7 specific counties? You hate Muslims cause of rape and 9/11, but you are OK with Russia legalized beating of the wife and don't give a shit about Saudi Arabia.

We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.

Nope. Don't hate all muslims, but you Libs love your hyperbole. Relax kid, you don't threaten anyone.

Once again, (for the 3rd or 4th time), the question I posed was why the 95% plus peace-loving muslims cannot eradicate the 5% or less radical muslims in their midst. You say it has nothing to do with the muslim religion. I say it has everything to do with their religion. What else binds them all in common interest stronger than that? What is the most important institution in those shitty countries and communities, Hondo? The Mosque. And you know it. It's not the police station, school or post office.

I'm glad we agree that bombing ISIS targets is legit, but all your after-the-fact bitching about collateral damage undermines your support for that, so you really are talking from both sides of your mouth on that. OK. No biggie. Nothing new here.

But you still haven't answered the question, Hondo. I'll take "shitty cultures" as an outright admission that the West is heads and tails better than those shitty muslim ones you cite in your argument. And while nobody holds you accountable for every asshole who stones his own daughter to death or cuts of the head of his neighbor, the cutesy "What about Russia(?)" bullshit is just tired, lazy, feeble, and not the issue. And you know it.

I have said nothing about collateral damage. And you are so blinded by the Muslim hysteria that you can't even comprehend what I'm saying. And it has nothing to do with culture of the West being better, look at India. Not to mention our own crime rate is much higher than it should be.And Mexico's culture isn't much better than the middle East. I suppose Muslims are too blame there too?

Hondo, I ask you to stick to the issue and stop jumping all over the map, and you respond by using a bigger map.

You clearly prefer to spew classic reactionary, distracting rhetoric instead of trying to answer the larger questions about solutions. In so doing, you mimic the problems of the Middle East and failed states in general, which is to bitch, complain, burn buildings and blow shit up, then wonder why their shitty cultures and countries can't progress from their third-world status.

You're great at spinning wheels and making smoke, Hondo. But really quite bad at proposing any solutions or explaining what you suggest would be a better solution to the Islamic Terrorism problem worldwide, however small you believe it is. It remains a potent threat so long as money flows to it's various causes and rival groups throughout the Arab world and Middle East, which means the US will continue to kill people in its efforts to control and diminish the threat, giving people like yourself a steady stream of news stories to bitch about and justify muslim terrorism with, with no end in sight. It's the failure of your type of thinking that keeps this problem alive and turns it into a simple numbers game of risk elimination. Reform is the only answer, not ignoring the problem until it lands on the US doorstep again. Been there, done that. Not gonna happen again.

You are searching for a solution to something that's not a problem.

HTH

So Radical Islamist Terrorism is not a problem, but Islamophobia or "Muslim Hysteria" is.

Well, why didn't you say so?

2001400ex said:

TurdBuffer said:

2001400ex said:

TurdBuffer said:

2001400ex said:

TurdBuffer said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

TurdBuffer said:

Still waiting, Hondo.

I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.

You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.

To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.

@turdfucker I answered your question here. I'll your again slowly so you'll maybe understand. It's not the religion that's the issue. The issue is shitty cultures that the religion can be found in. Like Trump's Muslim ban, why was it only from 7 specific counties? You hate Muslims cause of rape and 9/11, but you are OK with Russia legalized beating of the wife and don't give a shit about Saudi Arabia.

We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.

Nope. Don't hate all muslims, but you Libs love your hyperbole. Relax kid, you don't threaten anyone.

Once again, (for the 3rd or 4th time), the question I posed was why the 95% plus peace-loving muslims cannot eradicate the 5% or less radical muslims in their midst. You say it has nothing to do with the muslim religion. I say it has everything to do with their religion. What else binds them all in common interest stronger than that? What is the most important institution in those shitty countries and communities, Hondo? The Mosque. And you know it. It's not the police station, school or post office.

I'm glad we agree that bombing ISIS targets is legit, but all your after-the-fact bitching about collateral damage undermines your support for that, so you really are talking from both sides of your mouth on that. OK. No biggie. Nothing new here.

But you still haven't answered the question, Hondo. I'll take "shitty cultures" as an outright admission that the West is heads and tails better than those shitty muslim ones you cite in your argument. And while nobody holds you accountable for every asshole who stones his own daughter to death or cuts of the head of his neighbor, the cutesy "What about Russia(?)" bullshit is just tired, lazy, feeble, and not the issue. And you know it.

I have said nothing about collateral damage. And you are so blinded by the Muslim hysteria that you can't even comprehend what I'm saying. And it has nothing to do with culture of the West being better, look at India. Not to mention our own crime rate is much higher than it should be.And Mexico's culture isn't much better than the middle East. I suppose Muslims are too blame there too?

Hondo, I ask you to stick to the issue and stop jumping all over the map, and you respond by using a bigger map.

You clearly prefer to spew classic reactionary, distracting rhetoric instead of trying to answer the larger questions about solutions. In so doing, you mimic the problems of the Middle East and failed states in general, which is to bitch, complain, burn buildings and blow shit up, then wonder why their shitty cultures and countries can't progress from their third-world status.

You're great at spinning wheels and making smoke, Hondo. But really quite bad at proposing any solutions or explaining what you suggest would be a better solution to the Islamic Terrorism problem worldwide, however small you believe it is. It remains a potent threat so long as money flows to it's various causes and rival groups throughout the Arab world and Middle East, which means the US will continue to kill people in its efforts to control and diminish the threat, giving people like yourself a steady stream of news stories to bitch about and justify muslim terrorism with, with no end in sight. It's the failure of your type of thinking that keeps this problem alive and turns it into a simple numbers game of risk elimination. Reform is the only answer, not ignoring the problem until it lands on the US doorstep again. Been there, done that. Not gonna happen again.

You are searching for a solution to something that's not a problem.

HTH

So Radical Islamist Terrorism is not a problem, but Islamophobia or "Muslim Hysteria" is.

Well, why didn't you say so?

Holy shit you do not get it. At. All. Yes ISIS is an issue. Turdfucker. Yes there are some whacked out Muslims. Yes there are whacked out Christians. There are whacked out atheists. The problem isn't the religion. It's the culture in those shitty areas. Or else Trump would have included Saudi Arabia, India, etc with high Muslim populations.

Ah, of course. Here you go with the canard of "Christians are just as bad as Muslims and do the same thing, so they're all equally as good or bad as each other, so it CAN'T be a religious problem." Right. Except for that inconvenient fact that one religious group is currently doing the bad shit today and constantly threatening more, while the other hasn't engaged in such slaughter in about 400 years. But we should view them and treat them as equal threats, to be fair, I suppose.

Ever heard of Clear and Present danger? What is the current Christian equal of ISIS's threat?