Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Study: border wall might save taxpayers $64 billion over 10 years

doogie
Member Posts: 15,072
in Tug Tavern
This should be GREAT news to all you progressives suddenly concerned about budget deficits.
http://cis.org/The-Cost-of-a-Border-Wall-vs-the-Cost-of-Illegal-Immigration
http://cis.org/The-Cost-of-a-Border-Wall-vs-the-Cost-of-Illegal-Immigration
Comments
-
There isn't going to be any wall.
-
If a wall stopped half of those expected to successfully enter illegally without going through a port of entry at the southern border over the next 10 years, it would save taxpayers nearly $64 billion — several times the wall's cost.
this is what you're referencing right?
If it had any chance of that I'd be all for it.
it won't -
I READ IT ON THE INTERNET, IT HAS TO BE TRUE!!!
-
Mine fields, with warning signs in English, would be a much cheaper option.
-
Did that study include the economic activity generated by those immigrants?
-
"If you build a 30 ft. wall, all it's going to do is create a market for 31 ft. ladders."
-
According to CirrhosisDawg those jobs are unskilled and don't mean anything anyways.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Did that study include the economic activity generated by those immigrants?
-
People enter the US from Mexico legally and then don't go back.
That's how illegal immigration happens.
A wall won't stop that.
Article is bullshit. -
I say we deport their kids only. Then they can choose to go back. Would only cost half as much and obviously the parents would leave on their own accord.
I've been thinking about this and can't find any holes in this plan.