Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Bush Hamdan is new Atlanta Falcons' QB Coach

1…1112141617

Comments

  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 6,017
    92-12 Pete knows what the fuck he is doing. Seattle Washington is a much better landing spot then Boise. He will recruit another good coach
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2017
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    I give you the next WR Coach at UW, Kim will be ecstatic...

































    image

    Was expecting Nuss.

    That was better.
    #Pac12WarriorPoet
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DubSixGamer
    DubSixGamer Member Posts: 164
    So who are the candidates to fill in Bush's position?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    DubSixGamer said:

    So who are the candidates to fill in Bush's position?

    @PeterNorthDawg
    Dickens Cider
    Fitzer Good

    etc
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,052 Standard Supporter
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    My only hard complaint about losing Hamdan is that we still have Smith. From that standpoint it's bullshit. Also, Pete isn't immune from making shitty hires, so it's not like we are guaranteed to upgrade or even have the same caliber of WR coach as Hamdan.

    Hopefully he makes a good hire, and not Pease 2.0.

    RoadDawg55 said:

    The WR's were much improved. The real area he will be missed is recruiting.

    Was Hamdan really that good? Or was Pease just really that bad? Pettis is a fucking freak in the air and great at returning punts. I'm not sure either can be coached. And Ross was fucking Ross and as we witnessed, speed kills. We had a lot of short, under-thrown balls by our QB that required improvisation and adjustments that struck me as outside the routes in the playbook this year. So, while Hamdan appeared to be much improved over Pease, how do we know how much was him versus his players? Given only 1 year, I'm not convinced Hamdan was the major factor in the improved WR play, so I'm optimistic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    TurdBuffer said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    My only hard complaint about losing Hamdan is that we still have Smith. From that standpoint it's bullshit. Also, Pete isn't immune from making shitty hires, so it's not like we are guaranteed to upgrade or even have the same caliber of WR coach as Hamdan.

    Hopefully he makes a good hire, and not Pease 2.0.

    RoadDawg55 said:

    The WR's were much improved. The real area he will be missed is recruiting.

    Was Hamdan really that good? Or was Pease just really that bad? Pettis is a fucking freak in the air and great at returning punts. I'm not sure either can be coached. And Ross was fucking Ross and as we witnessed, speed kills. We had a lot of short, under-thrown balls by our QB that required improvisation and adjustments that struck me as outside the routes in the playbook this year. So, while Hamdan appeared to be much improved over Pease, how do we know how much was him versus his players? Given only 1 year, I'm not convinced Hamdan was the major factor in the improved WR play, so I'm optimistic.
    WHAT

    the difference between pease and hamdan on all fronts was fucking breathtaking

    am i being whooshed
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,052 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2017
    Gladstone said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    My only hard complaint about losing Hamdan is that we still have Smith. From that standpoint it's bullshit. Also, Pete isn't immune from making shitty hires, so it's not like we are guaranteed to upgrade or even have the same caliber of WR coach as Hamdan.

    Hopefully he makes a good hire, and not Pease 2.0.

    RoadDawg55 said:

    The WR's were much improved. The real area he will be missed is recruiting.

    Was Hamdan really that good? Or was Pease just really that bad? Pettis is a fucking freak in the air and great at returning punts. I'm not sure either can be coached. And Ross was fucking Ross and as we witnessed, speed kills. We had a lot of short, under-thrown balls by our QB that required improvisation and adjustments that struck me as outside the routes in the playbook this year. So, while Hamdan appeared to be much improved over Pease, how do we know how much was him versus his players? Given only 1 year, I'm not convinced Hamdan was the major factor in the improved WR play, so I'm optimistic.
    WHAT

    the difference between pease and hamdan on all fronts was fucking breathtaking

    am i being whooshed
    Sort of. I agree the WR play was much better this year and the gap between Hamdan and Pease looked huge, but if Pease was terrible - as I think he was - then an average or decent coach looks great in comparison. Plus factoring in the unique and substantial talents of Ross and Pettis raises the question: How much of that was solely the effect of coaching? Reminder: Ross didn't play last year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,360
    TurdBuffer said:

    Gladstone said:

    TurdBuffer said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    My only hard complaint about losing Hamdan is that we still have Smith. From that standpoint it's bullshit. Also, Pete isn't immune from making shitty hires, so it's not like we are guaranteed to upgrade or even have the same caliber of WR coach as Hamdan.

    Hopefully he makes a good hire, and not Pease 2.0.

    RoadDawg55 said:

    The WR's were much improved. The real area he will be missed is recruiting.

    Was Hamdan really that good? Or was Pease just really that bad? Pettis is a fucking freak in the air and great at returning punts. I'm not sure either can be coached. And Ross was fucking Ross and as we witnessed, speed kills. We had a lot of short, under-thrown balls by our QB that required improvisation and adjustments that struck me as outside the routes in the playbook this year. So, while Hamdan appeared to be much improved over Pease, how do we know how much was him versus his players? Given only 1 year, I'm not convinced Hamdan was the major factor in the improved WR play, so I'm optimistic.
    WHAT

    the difference between pease and hamdan on all fronts was fucking breathtaking

    am i being whooshed
    Sort of. I agree the WR play was much better this year and the gap between Hamdan and Pease looked huge, but if Pease was terrible - as I think he was - then an average or decent coach looks great in comparison. Plus factoring in the unique and substantial talents of Ross and Pettis raises the question: How much of that was solely the effect of coaching? Reminder: Ross didn't play last year.
    Ross wasn't that good prior to this year. Talented yes, but not super productive. Small sample size like you said but pettis wasn't that great prior also.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter