SFlori-zona North
Comments
-
Oregon slightly ahead of UW in the rankings....and it only took the addition of six more commits than UW took to get there.
Congrats! -
You'd have to be quite Quookish to not be jealous of UW's receiving and TE class. And quite Doogish to pump up that you stole Molden from the school that landed Lenoir and Graham. Both classes had their hits and misses, and rankings be damned are more similar than dissimilar.
-
Oh oh. It looks like the doogs are not caring about Oregon again.
Tell me again where Washington's class ranked after being gift-wrapped a spot in a playoff game in which it ostensibly did not belong? And how did they do relative to Oregon who, what, went 0-12 last year, fired a coach, got a coach, suspended a S&C coach and fired a co-O coordinator before he even got to campuss?
I'm assuming Washington did WAAAAAY better right? With all that name recognition and awesome (smoke and mirrors) season and what not. -
Miami signed as many UW targets as Oregon did.creepycoug said:Oh oh. It looks like the doogs are not caring about Oregon again.
Tell me again where Washington's class ranked after being gift-wrapped a spot in a playoff game in which it ostensibly did not belong? And how did they do relative to Oregon who, what, went 0-12 last year, fired a coach, got a coach, suspended a S&C coach and fired a co-O coordinator before he even got to campuss?
I'm assuming Washington did WAAAAAY better right? With all that name recognition and awesome (smoke and mirrors) season and what not.
But I'm hearing Oregon is going to sign 15+ 4*s next year which should be good for a top-5 class nationally. -
You are incomprehensible. First off, the word "Miami" doesn't really belong in any conversation relating to Washington and Oregon, especially as it relates to recruiting. The Canes will let Peterman have his OKGs (talk about GHEY things). Not interested. Miami can pull in better guys who couldn't start in HS.FremontTroll said:
Miami signed as many UW targets as Oregon did.creepycoug said:Oh oh. It looks like the doogs are not caring about Oregon again.
Tell me again where Washington's class ranked after being gift-wrapped a spot in a playoff game in which it ostensibly did not belong? And how did they do relative to Oregon who, what, went 0-12 last year, fired a coach, got a coach, suspended a S&C coach and fired a co-O coordinator before he even got to campuss?
I'm assuming Washington did WAAAAAY better right? With all that name recognition and awesome (smoke and mirrors) season and what not.
But I'm hearing Oregon is going to sign 15+ 4*s next year which should be good for a top-5 class nationally.
Next year Oregon is irrelevant, but nice deflection.
Face it. Best UW season in 16 years, worst Oregon season in whatever time frame (somebody here will know for certain) and you get the same recruiting results.
It's stinging you in the pussy and you know it. And I know you know it, and you know I know you know it. -
Creepycoug is still talking?
Christ. -
Yes, and you are still reading. Don't pretend like you just showed up dick drip. I know better.CuntWaffle said:Creepycoug is still talking?
Christ. -
Oh, fuck. Here comes the rescue squad. But, don't forget, nobody's concerned.GaryFromTeenMom said:Oregon slightly ahead of UW in the rankings....and it only took the addition of six more commits than UW took to get there.
Congrats! -
That is the point.creepycoug said:
You are incomprehensible. First off, the word "Miami" doesn't really belong in any conversation relating to Washington and Oregon, especially as it relates to recruiting. The Canes will let Peterman have his OKGs (talk about GHEY things). Not interested. Miami can pull in better guys who couldn't start in HS.FremontTroll said:
Miami signed as many UW targets as Oregon did.creepycoug said:Oh oh. It looks like the doogs are not caring about Oregon again.
Tell me again where Washington's class ranked after being gift-wrapped a spot in a playoff game in which it ostensibly did not belong? And how did they do relative to Oregon who, what, went 0-12 last year, fired a coach, got a coach, suspended a S&C coach and fired a co-O coordinator before he even got to campuss?
I'm assuming Washington did WAAAAAY better right? With all that name recognition and awesome (smoke and mirrors) season and what not.
But I'm hearing Oregon is going to sign 15+ 4*s next year which should be good for a top-5 class nationally.
Next year Oregon is irrelevant, but nice deflection.
Face it. Best UW season in 16 years, worst Oregon season in whatever time frame (somebody here will know for certain) and you get the same recruiting results.
It's stinging you in the pussy and you know it. And I know you know it, and you know I know you know it.
Miami and UW operate in different universes. UW and UO conversely go head to head on numerous recruits every year.
Yet Miami got as many kids that UW wanted as UO did (One- DJ/BB.)
My second paragraph of snark was a shot at Fishduck's naive prediction that Taggart would top UO's high-water mark of 12 Rivals 4*s by a wide margin. -
FremontTroll said:
That is the point.
Miami and UW operate in different universes. UW and UO conversely go head to head on numerous recruits every year.
Yet Miami got as many kids that UW wanted as UO did (One- DJ/BB.)
My second paragraph of snark was a shot at Fishduck's naive prediction that Taggart would top UO's high-water mark of 12 Rivals 4*s by a wide margin.
