Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

It is Done

We made it through the recruiting season. My soul has been cleansed, I feel refreshed. Now it starts all over again this weekend as we have a junior day.

With the guidance of @spirithorse we will get through this next year as well.

I love you all, we all disagree a lot, but it's fucking fun to follow this bullshit with you fuckers.

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    So, is this our? best class since 2001?
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    I have ventured over to the TBS bored.

    I now feel I have to shower and clear my browser history.
  • AlCzervik
    AlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    topdawgnc said:

    I have ventured over to the TBS bored.

    I now feel I have to shower and clear my browser history.

    Try living with that every day.
  • DawgFader
    DawgFader Member Posts: 1,414
    So does this bored close up for the winter now? When would be a good time to check back in?
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Now would be a good time to throw those sweatpants in the washer
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Papa petersen seems a little testy
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    I love the BUSH
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    That goes right along with the idea of how important development is to Pete ... the failure to him in recruiting is when the guys they recruit don't pan out or leave the program early.

    If you think about it, 20 per class over a 5 year period is 100 recruits ... assuming that you have 3 early entrants per year that gets you to 85 fairly consistently.

    I expect that there will be a few classes that get more in the 20-22 range at some point for one reason or another ... but 25 will be an indication that something likely went very wrong.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    I buy about 80% of this comment ...

    There's no question that Pete knows the guys that they targeted and didn't get ... and he'd be lying to you if he said that he didn't want them.

    But from this point forward, he's all about the guys on the roster.
  • HHBruh
    HHBruh Member Posts: 507
    DawgFader said:

    So does this bored close up for the winter now? When would be a good time to check back in?

    Check with @IrishDawg22 he can help you get dialed in.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129
    Tequilla said:

    I buy about 80% of this comment ...

    There's no question that Pete knows the guys that they targeted and didn't get ... and he'd be lying to you if he said that he didn't want them.

    But from this point forward, he's all about the guys on the roster.
    Your last sentence nailed it. There's nothing he can do about it now so there is no need to focus on guys that aren't here.
  • NEsnake12
    NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,795
    Tequilla said:

    That goes right along with the idea of how important development is to Pete ... the failure to him in recruiting is when the guys they recruit don't pan out or leave the program early.

    If you think about it, 20 per class over a 5 year period is 100 recruits ... assuming that you have 3 early entrants per year that gets you to 85 fairly consistently.

    I expect that there will be a few classes that get more in the 20-22 range at some point for one reason or another ... but 25 will be an indication that something likely went very wrong.
    Nitpicking but that's not how you math. Players can't declare for the draft until after 3 years obviously, so the youngest 3 classes would all be 20 deep. Leaves 25 left to split over 2 years... which funny enough is how UW has looked the last couple of years (but that was mainly due to coaching change attrition, not early entrants).
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    NEsnake12 said:

    Tequilla said:

    That goes right along with the idea of how important development is to Pete ... the failure to him in recruiting is when the guys they recruit don't pan out or leave the program early.

    If you think about it, 20 per class over a 5 year period is 100 recruits ... assuming that you have 3 early entrants per year that gets you to 85 fairly consistently.

    I expect that there will be a few classes that get more in the 20-22 range at some point for one reason or another ... but 25 will be an indication that something likely went very wrong.
    Nitpicking but that's not how you math. Players can't declare for the draft until after 3 years obviously, so the youngest 3 classes would all be 20 deep. Leaves 25 left to split over 2 years... which funny enough is how UW has looked the last couple of years (but that was mainly due to coaching change attrition, not early entrants).
    Besides the fact that you're initial starting point is slightly skewed, you are also missing that included in the net 3 leaving the program on average per year also can include attrition from either medical retirements or just flat out leaving the program.
  • NEsnake12
    NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,795
    Tequilla said:

    NEsnake12 said:

    Tequilla said:

    That goes right along with the idea of how important development is to Pete ... the failure to him in recruiting is when the guys they recruit don't pan out or leave the program early.

    If you think about it, 20 per class over a 5 year period is 100 recruits ... assuming that you have 3 early entrants per year that gets you to 85 fairly consistently.

    I expect that there will be a few classes that get more in the 20-22 range at some point for one reason or another ... but 25 will be an indication that something likely went very wrong.
    Nitpicking but that's not how you math. Players can't declare for the draft until after 3 years obviously, so the youngest 3 classes would all be 20 deep. Leaves 25 left to split over 2 years... which funny enough is how UW has looked the last couple of years (but that was mainly due to coaching change attrition, not early entrants).
    Besides the fact that you're initial starting point is slightly skewed, you are also missing that included in the net 3 leaving the program on average per year also can include attrition from either medical retirements or just flat out leaving the program.
    Then just say "attrition" in your post and not specifically "early entrants."
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,606 Standard Supporter

    So, is this our? best class since 2001?

    Off the top of my head, yes. And last years class was #2. We are starting to stack classes which is crucial. It's wonderful.
    I not understand recruits on the top of head. I see the mother fucking Oregon Ducks pulled in the young mens with the Willie Tugger but no so very good compared to the Peterman Christoph. The numbers on the sites that follow the young mens are smaller for Ducks young mens than for Huskies young mens. I congratulatum your best program for the bigger numbers. The Willie Tugger is no Bobbie Bill Thornton. I thinks the Willie Tugger is bads for the Duck football. I hopes his giant black penis is infected by the scourge of my village and dies of the full blown fire.

    That is all.
    bump <3
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,606 Standard Supporter

    So, is this our? best class since 2001?

    Off the top of my head, yes. And last years class was #2. We are starting to stack classes which is crucial. It's wonderful.
    I not understand recruits on the top of head. I see the mother fucking Oregon Ducks pulled in the young mens with the Willie Tugger but no so very good compared to the Peterman Christoph. The numbers on the sites that follow the young mens are smaller for Ducks young mens than for Huskies young mens. I congratulatum your best program for the bigger numbers. The Willie Tugger is no Bobbie Bill Thornton. I thinks the Willie Tugger is bads for the Duck football. I hopes his giant black penis is infected by the scourge of my village and dies of the full blown fire.

    That is all.
    BUMP
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    NEsnake12 said:

    Tequilla said:

    NEsnake12 said:

    Tequilla said:

    That goes right along with the idea of how important development is to Pete ... the failure to him in recruiting is when the guys they recruit don't pan out or leave the program early.

    If you think about it, 20 per class over a 5 year period is 100 recruits ... assuming that you have 3 early entrants per year that gets you to 85 fairly consistently.

    I expect that there will be a few classes that get more in the 20-22 range at some point for one reason or another ... but 25 will be an indication that something likely went very wrong.
    Nitpicking but that's not how you math. Players can't declare for the draft until after 3 years obviously, so the youngest 3 classes would all be 20 deep. Leaves 25 left to split over 2 years... which funny enough is how UW has looked the last couple of years (but that was mainly due to coaching change attrition, not early entrants).
    Besides the fact that you're initial starting point is slightly skewed, you are also missing that included in the net 3 leaving the program on average per year also can include attrition from either medical retirements or just flat out leaving the program.
    Then just say "attrition" in your post and not specifically "early entrants."
    There’s different types of attrition
  • DuckinTurkey
    DuckinTurkey Member Posts: 39

    So, is this our? best class since 2001?

    Off the top of my head, yes. And last years class was #2. We are starting to stack classes which is crucial. It's wonderful.
    I not understand recruits on the top of head. I see the mother fucking Oregon Ducks pulled in the young mens with the Willie Tugger but no so very good compared to the Peterman Christoph. The numbers on the sites that follow the young mens are smaller for Ducks young mens than for Huskies young mens. I congratulatum your best program for the bigger numbers. The Willie Tugger is no Bobbie Bill Thornton. I thinks the Willie Tugger is bads for the Duck football. I hopes his giant black penis is infected by the scourge of my village and dies of the full blown fire.

    That is all.
    BUMP
    Hello, I forgot abouts this poast. I have huge shame reading it. My English was worse than than smell of alaturka after my sister leaves shit after 6 courses of lentil and goat stew on Eid al-Fitr.

  • Doog_de_Jour
    Doog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,041 Standard Supporter

    So, is this our? best class since 2001?

    Off the top of my head, yes. And last years class was #2. We are starting to stack classes which is crucial. It's wonderful.
    I not understand recruits on the top of head. I see the mother fucking Oregon Ducks pulled in the young mens with the Willie Tugger but no so very good compared to the Peterman Christoph. The numbers on the sites that follow the young mens are smaller for Ducks young mens than for Huskies young mens. I congratulatum your best program for the bigger numbers. The Willie Tugger is no Bobbie Bill Thornton. I thinks the Willie Tugger is bads for the Duck football. I hopes his giant black penis is infected by the scourge of my village and dies of the full blown fire.

    That is all.
    BUMP
    Hello, I forgot abouts this poast. I have huge shame reading it. My English was worse than than smell of alaturka after my sister leaves shit after 6 courses of lentil and goat stew on Eid al-Fitr.

    Wow. I’m an idiot.

    I finally realized your username is a play on turducken. Well done.