Trump isn't Hitler
Comments
-
Oh, it's this guy again. You seem like You're a fag.TurdBuffer said:
How old were you as a sixth grader? Jesus! For the last time, it's "are you 15?"AlCzervik said:
Did a sixth-grader write this?WilburHooksHands said:Her getting fired isn't that crazy, she knew it was coming after she made that decision and Trump is going to get his guys in there anyway. The statement released by the White House is unreal though.
Were you 15 in 6th grade? Oh shit. I'm sorry.
-
AlCzervik said:
Oh, it's this guy again. You seem like You're a fag.TurdBuffer said:
How old were you as a sixth grader? Jesus! For the last time, it's "are you 15?"AlCzervik said:
Did a sixth-grader write this?WilburHooksHands said:Her getting fired isn't that crazy, she knew it was coming after she made that decision and Trump is going to get his guys in there anyway. The statement released by the White House is unreal though.
Were you 15 in 6th grade? Oh shit. I'm sorry.
-
Bans on immigration aren't new or exciting. But the incompetency with which the Trump administration orchestrated this maneuver was legendary. This was a Jed York firing Harbaugh level of stupid. Yet at the same time, it was also extremely predictable.
-
Newsweek ran the Madam President cover, right?2001400ex said:
“American voters support 48 – 42 percent suspending immigration from ‘terror prone’ regions, even if it means turning away refugees from those regions,” states a press release from Quinnipiac University, which questioned 899 people by calling their landline and cell phones in early January.HoustonHusky said:
http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/january_2017/most_support_temporary_ban_on_newcomers_from_terrorist_havens2001400ex said:
Komo4HoustonHusky said:The nut job Left is classic. They spend the weekend freaking out and then polls come out supporting the policy almost 2-1. They spent the first week screaming their lungs out about every little move Trump does, and from that they finally have a legitimate bitch about how the policy was actually rolled out and it gets drown out by all of the other hysteria they are trying to generate.
Go fuck yourself.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.newsweek.com/trump-voters-back-immigration-ban-549887?amp=1?client=ms-android-verizon
However, you read fox news and it pretends this poll was after the executive order.
https://www.google.com/amp/insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/53966?client=ms-android-verizon
And your poll is Rasmussen (the only poll showing over 50% approval) and the last calls were January 26. Don't you think the last 3 days of vetting the order changes things?
Do you ever feel like you've been duped by your news source? -
Take responsibility for the fact that you read and regurgitate Pravda: America Edition.doogie said:
Newsweek ran the Madam President cover, right?2001400ex said:
“American voters support 48 – 42 percent suspending immigration from ‘terror prone’ regions, even if it means turning away refugees from those regions,” states a press release from Quinnipiac University, which questioned 899 people by calling their landline and cell phones in early January.HoustonHusky said:
http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/january_2017/most_support_temporary_ban_on_newcomers_from_terrorist_havens2001400ex said:
Komo4HoustonHusky said:The nut job Left is classic. They spend the weekend freaking out and then polls come out supporting the policy almost 2-1. They spent the first week screaming their lungs out about every little move Trump does, and from that they finally have a legitimate bitch about how the policy was actually rolled out and it gets drown out by all of the other hysteria they are trying to generate.
Go fuck yourself.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.newsweek.com/trump-voters-back-immigration-ban-549887?amp=1?client=ms-android-verizon
However, you read fox news and it pretends this poll was after the executive order.
https://www.google.com/amp/insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/53966?client=ms-android-verizon
And your poll is Rasmussen (the only poll showing over 50% approval) and the last calls were January 26. Don't you think the last 3 days of vetting the order changes things?
Do you ever feel like you've been duped by your news source? -
Your handle implies you were fucked by 61 dudes.Dude61 said:Trumps EO is consistent with the Constitution and Federal Regs. Insubordination is a sure way to shorten your career.
LEAVE -
yes. the bans would have gotten outrage either way. but had the original ban not included green card holders it would have been a hell of a lot more defensible.GreenRiverGatorz said:Bans on immigration aren't new or exciting. But the incompetency with which the Trump administration orchestrated this maneuver was legendary. This was a Jed York firing Harbaugh level of stupid. Yet at the same time, it was also extremely predictable.
-
2001400ex said:
“American voters support 48 – 42 percent suspending immigration from ‘terror prone’ regions, even if it means turning away refugees from those regions,” states a press release from Quinnipiac University, which questioned 899 people by calling their landline and cell phones in early January.HoustonHusky said:
http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/january_2017/most_support_temporary_ban_on_newcomers_from_terrorist_havens2001400ex said:
Komo4HoustonHusky said:The nut job Left is classic. They spend the weekend freaking out and then polls come out supporting the policy almost 2-1. They spent the first week screaming their lungs out about every little move Trump does, and from that they finally have a legitimate bitch about how the policy was actually rolled out and it gets drown out by all of the other hysteria they are trying to generate.
Go fuck yourself.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.newsweek.com/trump-voters-back-immigration-ban-549887?amp=1?client=ms-android-verizon
However, you read fox news and it pretends this poll was after the executive order.
https://www.google.com/amp/insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/53966?client=ms-android-verizon
And your poll is Rasmussen (the only poll showing over 50% approval) and the last calls were January 26. Don't you think the last 3 days of vetting the order changes things?
Do you ever feel like you've been duped by your news source?
Your response is to cite a different poll that agrees with me in direction if not the almost 2-1 ratio and think that proves your point? God you are a fucking moron.2001400ex said:
“American voters support 48 – 42 percent suspending immigration from ‘terror prone’ regions, even if it means turning away refugees from those regions,” states a press release from Quinnipiac University, which questioned 899 people by calling their landline and cell phones in early January.HoustonHusky said:
http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/january_2017/most_support_temporary_ban_on_newcomers_from_terrorist_havens2001400ex said:
Komo4HoustonHusky said:The nut job Left is classic. They spend the weekend freaking out and then polls come out supporting the policy almost 2-1. They spent the first week screaming their lungs out about every little move Trump does, and from that they finally have a legitimate bitch about how the policy was actually rolled out and it gets drown out by all of the other hysteria they are trying to generate.
Go fuck yourself.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.newsweek.com/trump-voters-back-immigration-ban-549887?amp=1?client=ms-android-verizon
However, you read fox news and it pretends this poll was after the executive order.
https://www.google.com/amp/insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/53966?client=ms-android-verizon
And your poll is Rasmussen (the only poll showing over 50% approval) and the last calls were January 26. Don't you think the last 3 days of vetting the order changes things?
Do you ever feel like you've been duped by your news source?
Add to that a poll that doesn't publish (that I could find) it's underlying assumptions and was notorious about being pro-Hillary (go look at their final polls for states like Penn, Mich, etc)...if it makes you feel better I'm sure the WP will come out with some push polls to try and swing opinion like they did with Obama's final "approval", but only a few as dumb enough as you will believe them. And yes, you are a big enough moron to think inconveniencing average travelers at the airport and screaming on CNN and MSNBC who have a couple million people in total watching, 99% of which have already made up their mind is suddenly going to change millions of minds about a temporary ban on people coming in from 7 war-torn countries, 5 of which Obama was actively bombing.
God I hate typing on an iPad. -
again, that poll was taken on the 5th through the 9th. Before it's enactment.HoustonHusky said:2001400ex said:
“American voters support 48 – 42 percent suspending immigration from ‘terror prone’ regions, even if it means turning away refugees from those regions,” states a press release from Quinnipiac University, which questioned 899 people by calling their landline and cell phones in early January.HoustonHusky said:
http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/january_2017/most_support_temporary_ban_on_newcomers_from_terrorist_havens2001400ex said:
Komo4HoustonHusky said:The nut job Left is classic. They spend the weekend freaking out and then polls come out supporting the policy almost 2-1. They spent the first week screaming their lungs out about every little move Trump does, and from that they finally have a legitimate bitch about how the policy was actually rolled out and it gets drown out by all of the other hysteria they are trying to generate.
Go fuck yourself.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.newsweek.com/trump-voters-back-immigration-ban-549887?amp=1?client=ms-android-verizon
However, you read fox news and it pretends this poll was after the executive order.
https://www.google.com/amp/insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/53966?client=ms-android-verizon
And your poll is Rasmussen (the only poll showing over 50% approval) and the last calls were January 26. Don't you think the last 3 days of vetting the order changes things?
Do you ever feel like you've been duped by your news source?
Your response is to cite a different poll that agrees with me in direction if not the almost 2-1 ratio and think that proves your point? God you are a fucking moron.2001400ex said:
“American voters support 48 – 42 percent suspending immigration from ‘terror prone’ regions, even if it means turning away refugees from those regions,” states a press release from Quinnipiac University, which questioned 899 people by calling their landline and cell phones in early January.HoustonHusky said:
http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/january_2017/most_support_temporary_ban_on_newcomers_from_terrorist_havens2001400ex said:
Komo4HoustonHusky said:The nut job Left is classic. They spend the weekend freaking out and then polls come out supporting the policy almost 2-1. They spent the first week screaming their lungs out about every little move Trump does, and from that they finally have a legitimate bitch about how the policy was actually rolled out and it gets drown out by all of the other hysteria they are trying to generate.
Go fuck yourself.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.newsweek.com/trump-voters-back-immigration-ban-549887?amp=1?client=ms-android-verizon
However, you read fox news and it pretends this poll was after the executive order.
https://www.google.com/amp/insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/53966?client=ms-android-verizon
And your poll is Rasmussen (the only poll showing over 50% approval) and the last calls were January 26. Don't you think the last 3 days of vetting the order changes things?
Do you ever feel like you've been duped by your news source?
Add to that a poll that doesn't publish (that I could find) it's underlying assumptions and was notorious about being pro-Hillary (go look at their final polls for states like Penn, Mich, etc)...if it makes you feel better I'm sure the WP will come out with some push polls to try and swing opinion like they did with Obama's final "approval", but only a few as dumb enough as you will believe them. And yes, you are a big enough moron to think inconveniencing average travelers at the airport and screaming on CNN and MSNBC who have a couple million people in total watching, 99% of which have already made up their mind is suddenly going to change millions of minds about a temporary ban on people coming in from 7 war-torn countries, 5 of which Obama was actively bombing then you really are the moron I think you are.
The execution was about 5 times worse than the policy itself
-
Although I disagree with the EO, I hate the political grandstanding of Sally Yates. You don't want to defend an EO for which a reasonable legal argument could be made (i.e. your job [hint: "not convinced of its legality" still means you could make a reasonable legal argument for it...])? Resign. This was clearly a political ploy. What's worse are the people calling her a hero for pulling a political stunt to set her up for political or private opportunities, especially when she was probably not going to have a job in about 24-48 hours anyways. Hero my ass.
