Southerndawg didn't want to answer the economic liberalism question. And turd buffer is quad posting. I like the conservative meltdown. Anyone regret their Trump vote yet?
Choosing not to respond to your stupid shit is not the same as not wanting to answer a question. I left a link for sleddog to assist him in his "confusion", feel free to click and learn. If you still believe Obamanomics and the record number of economic regulations that shit stain strangled the economy with comport with the tenets of economic liberalism then you're more daft than even I assumed.
And why would anyone regret voting for Trump? Spectacular first week. The left collectively and completely losing their minds and chasing dog whistles is pure comedy gold. I'm looking forward to years of this.
In other words, you don't know what economic liberalism is. Obama had 8 years without a recession and with employment growth. I'm not sure you understand how the economy works. But OK! Scream regulations. And taxes. And ignore what's happened the past 40 years when we decreased regulations and taxes.
Wrong. Obama's actions, slapping an historic number of economic regulations on the US economy and raising taxes are in direct opposition to economic liberalism, not in concert with it. As for the economy Obama created, most anemic growth rates we've experienced in many many decades.
OK. Look at the 90s, when we had the best growth the last 40 years. Would you say Clinton was cut tax and regulations?
he actually did. and it contributed to the crash of 2008.
But he's probably a Marxist too according to these idiots.
So Clinton wasn't a Marxist? You mean he just wore that Che T-Shirt to get pussy?
No restrictions on countries that have Trump buildongs and courses.
This could actually be how Trump fucks himself. Because he did not listen to his advisers and fully divest himself of his 144 businesses in 25 countries, Trump is already on thin Constitutional ice under the Emoluments Clause. With this, the argument is now right there that Trumpy is putting his business interests ahead of national interests and security. While it probably won't lead to impeachment right away, it's an incredibly stupid (personally) move on Trump's part. Any decent legal mind could have a field day with this and some will. Stay tuned.
No restrictions on countries that have Trump buildongs and courses.
This could actually be how Trump fucks himself. Because he did not listen to his advisers and fully divest himself of his 144 businesses in 25 countries, Trump is already on thin Constitutional ice under the Emoluments Clause. With this, the argument is now right there that Trumpy is putting his business interests ahead of national interests and security. While it probably won't lead to impeachment right away, it's an incredibly stupid (personally) move on Trump's part. Any decent legal mind could have a field day with this and some will. Stay tuned.
No restrictions on countries that have Trump buildongs and courses.
This could actually be how Trump fucks himself. Because he did not listen to his advisers and fully divest himself of his 144 businesses in 25 countries, Trump is already on thin Constitutional ice under the Emoluments Clause. With this, the argument is now right there that Trumpy is putting his business interests ahead of national interests and security. While it probably won't lead to impeachment right away, it's an incredibly stupid (personally) move on Trump's part. Any decent legal mind could have a field day with this and some will. Stay tuned.
No restrictions on countries that have Trump buildongs and courses.
This could actually be how Trump fucks himself. Because he did not listen to his advisers and fully divest himself of his 144 businesses in 25 countries, Trump is already on thin Constitutional ice under the Emoluments Clause. With this, the argument is now right there that Trumpy is putting his business interests ahead of national interests and security. While it probably won't lead to impeachment right away, it's an incredibly stupid (personally) move on Trump's part. Any decent legal mind could have a field day with this and some will. Stay tuned.
CNN much or OD on MSNBC and Madcow?
Do you actually think MSNBC is smart enough to think truth it like that?
Comments
while constitutional imo, looks like it maybe illegal statutorily. stay tuned