Always have? Hmmm you remember what last year of football only.
Great Holiday Bowl win 10 years ago.
Thanks!... Nice getting your ass kicked by Alabama.. I thought you had a chance for the first 5 mins.
I'm an Alabama fan, but UW won your conference. No room to talk IMO.
You are an Alabama fan on a Huskies board with the name PurpleJ... Ok well congrats on losing the nation championship. If we don't get Lake we will come take Tosh fuck face.
Are you gonna hire Saban instead of Wilcox? Didn't think so. No proven coach wants to go to your shit program. Case closed. End of story.
I know your* being sarktastic, but both Wilcox and Baldwin are proven coaches.
Having Cooper Kupp and Bo-Jangles Whatever as QB doesn't make a proven coach.
Always have? Hmmm you remember what last year of football only.
Great Holiday Bowl win 10 years ago.
Thanks!... Nice getting your ass kicked by Alabama.. I thought you had a chance for the first 5 mins.
I'm an Alabama fan, but UW won your conference. No room to talk IMO.
You are an Alabama fan on a Huskies board with the name PurpleJ... Ok well congrats on losing the nation championship. If we don't get Lake we will come take Tosh fuck face.
Are you gonna hire Saban instead of Wilcox? Didn't think so. No proven coach wants to go to your shit program. Case closed. End of story.
I know your* being sarktastic, but both Wilcox and Baldwin are proven coaches.
Having Cooper Kupp and Bo-Jangles Whatever as QB doesn't make a proven coach.
I think that Baldwin did a good job at Eastern and is a decent offensive coach.
The issue with Cal though isn't offense (pretty sure they were #1 in the conference in scoring when we played them). There teams pretty consistently put up 40+ under Dykes... they just gave up 50+ at the same time.
The question will of course be Wilcox and what he can do defensively behind Lake or whoever is hired as DC. Wilcox had OK defenses here but like Sark the defenses wilted in big time games. Part of that was probably due to Sark being a offensive dumbfuck and giving the defense no rest and the other offense way too many possessions.
But look at what Wilcoxs defense did in the Big 10 championship game.
I'd take Wilcox over Dykes for sure though. Dykes was like a Mike Leach lite.
I was there! I just remember the Cal boys eating the double Dong dildo foot long hot dogs.
I was there too, and whoever took that pic took it from very near where our Gold Zone family season tickets were. Fourth-string RB Michael Porter ran for 75 yards on 4 carries late in the 4th quarter to give Cal the 54; Echemandu, Arrington, and O'Keith were all sitting by then. That was a cathartic wiin because because it was the first wiin over UW at home since the 1970's, and most of us hadn't made the trip up to Seattle in 2002 to see Cal break the streak up there against Skippy's team. It was also nice to beat a Gilby team, after what that worthless fuck did to our program.
I don't think I got to see it, but it was satisfying to listen to the 56-17 drubbing that Cal gave UW in 2005. I remember Dawgman pussies keening about Cal piling on because Forsett had a relatively long TD run in the 4th quarter, as if somehow it's bad form for a backup to try not to get tackled. You don't want them to score on you, make a fucking stop. As a fan, bitch at your team for not making the fucking stop, not at the opposing team whose scrubs are trying to win more PT.
Always have? Hmmm you remember what last year of football only.
Great Holiday Bowl win 10 years ago.
Thanks!... Nice getting your ass kicked by Alabama.. I thought you had a chance for the first 5 mins.
I'm an Alabama fan, but UW won your conference. No room to talk IMO.
You are an Alabama fan on a Huskies board with the name PurpleJ... Ok well congrats on losing the nation championship. If we don't get Lake we will come take Tosh fuck face.
Are you gonna hire Saban instead of Wilcox? Didn't think so. No proven coach wants to go to your shit program. Case closed. End of story.
I know your* being sarktastic, but both Wilcox and Baldwin are proven coaches.
Having Cooper Kupp and Bo-Jangles Whatever as QB doesn't make a proven coach.
I think that Baldwin did a good job at Eastern and is a decent offensive coach.
The issue with Cal though isn't offense (pretty sure they were #1 in the conference in scoring when we played them). There teams pretty consistently put up 40+ under Dykes... they just gave up 50+ at the same time.
The question will of course be Wilcox and what he can do defensively behind Lake or whoever is hired as DC. Wilcox had OK defenses here but like Sark the defenses wilted in big time games. Part of that was probably due to Sark being a offensive dumbfuck and giving the defense no rest and the other offense way too many possessions.
But look at what Wilcoxs defense did in the Big 10 championship game.
I'd take Wilcox over Dykes for sure though. Dykes was like a Mike Leach lite.
I wish he was like a Mike Leach lite. Man we could score, but I have never seen such bad defense. I think Wilcox will have our Defense playing much better, but we have no big DT/NT type DL. Our line last year was 250, 275, 285, 265... We then followed that up by only playing 2 LBs and were shocked we couldn't stop the run at all.
The switch the 3-4 Def is a must. IMO it is the best type of Def for college football. While a lot of people think we are light on LBs that just isnt' the case. Most of our DEs are way to light and would probably be more successful as an 3-4 OLB. Saffle, Weaver, etc. Looney at only 275 lbs is actually probably a dominate 3-4 DE. the problem we have is we don't have a monster NT like Vea.... I am typing all of this up and realize no one gives fuck... hahaha oh well.
Always have? Hmmm you remember what last year of football only.
Great Holiday Bowl win 10 years ago.
Thanks!... Nice getting your ass kicked by Alabama.. I thought you had a chance for the first 5 mins.
I'm an Alabama fan, but UW won your conference. No room to talk IMO.
You are an Alabama fan on a Huskies board with the name PurpleJ... Ok well congrats on losing the nation championship. If we don't get Lake we will come take Tosh fuck face.
Are you gonna hire Saban instead of Wilcox? Didn't think so. No proven coach wants to go to your shit program. Case closed. End of story.
I know your* being sarktastic, but both Wilcox and Baldwin are proven coaches.
Having Cooper Kupp and Bo-Jangles Whatever as QB doesn't make a proven coach.
I think that Baldwin did a good job at Eastern and is a decent offensive coach.
The issue with Cal though isn't offense (pretty sure they were #1 in the conference in scoring when we played them). There teams pretty consistently put up 40+ under Dykes... they just gave up 50+ at the same time.
The question will of course be Wilcox and what he can do defensively behind Lake or whoever is hired as DC. Wilcox had OK defenses here but like Sark the defenses wilted in big time games. Part of that was probably due to Sark being a offensive dumbfuck and giving the defense no rest and the other offense way too many possessions.
But look at what Wilcoxs defense did in the Big 10 championship game.
I'd take Wilcox over Dykes for sure though. Dykes was like a Mike Leach lite.
I wish he was like a Mike Leach lite. Man we could score, but I have never seen such bad defense. I think Wilcox will have our Defense playing much better, but we have no big DT/NT type DL. Our line last year was 250, 275, 285, 265... We then followed that up by only playing 2 LBs and were shocked we couldn't stop the run at all.
The switch the 3-4 Def is a must. IMO it is the best type of Def for college football. While a lot of people think we are light on LBs that just isnt' the case. Most of our DEs are way to light and would probably be more successful as an 3-4 OLB. Saffle, Weaver, etc. Looney at only 275 lbs is actually probably a dominate 3-4 DE. the problem we have is we don't have a monster NT like Vea.... I am typing all of this up and realize no one gives fuck... hahaha oh well.
Always have? Hmmm you remember what last year of football only.
Great Holiday Bowl win 10 years ago.
Thanks!... Nice getting your ass kicked by Alabama.. I thought you had a chance for the first 5 mins.
I'm an Alabama fan, but UW won your conference. No room to talk IMO.
You are an Alabama fan on a Huskies board with the name PurpleJ... Ok well congrats on losing the nation championship. If we don't get Lake we will come take Tosh fuck face.
Are you gonna hire Saban instead of Wilcox? Didn't think so. No proven coach wants to go to your shit program. Case closed. End of story.
I know your* being sarktastic, but both Wilcox and Baldwin are proven coaches.
Having Cooper Kupp and Bo-Jangles Whatever as QB doesn't make a proven coach.
I think that Baldwin did a good job at Eastern and is a decent offensive coach.
The issue with Cal though isn't offense (pretty sure they were #1 in the conference in scoring when we played them). There teams pretty consistently put up 40+ under Dykes... they just gave up 50+ at the same time.
The question will of course be Wilcox and what he can do defensively behind Lake or whoever is hired as DC. Wilcox had OK defenses here but like Sark the defenses wilted in big time games. Part of that was probably due to Sark being a offensive dumbfuck and giving the defense no rest and the other offense way too many possessions.
But look at what Wilcoxs defense did in the Big 10 championship game.
I'd take Wilcox over Dykes for sure though. Dykes was like a Mike Leach lite.
I wish he was like a Mike Leach lite. Man we could score, but I have never seen such bad defense. I think Wilcox will have our Defense playing much better, but we have no big DT/NT type DL. Our line last year was 250, 275, 285, 265... We then followed that up by only playing 2 LBs and were shocked we couldn't stop the run at all.
The switch the 3-4 Def is a must. IMO it is the best type of Def for college football. While a lot of people think we are light on LBs that just isnt' the case. Most of our DEs are way to light and would probably be more successful as an 3-4 OLB. Saffle, Weaver, etc. Looney at only 275 lbs is actually probably a dominate 3-4 DE. the problem we have is we don't have a monster NT like Vea.... I am typing all of this up and realize no one gives fuck... hahaha oh well.
Always have? Hmmm you remember what last year of football only.
Great Holiday Bowl win 10 years ago.
Thanks!... Nice getting your ass kicked by Alabama.. I thought you had a chance for the first 5 mins.
I'm an Alabama fan, but UW won your conference. No room to talk IMO.
You are an Alabama fan on a Huskies board with the name PurpleJ... Ok well congrats on losing the nation championship. If we don't get Lake we will come take Tosh fuck face.
Sounds like after 100 yards, Cal wants to have a football program.
Dare we use the "D" word?
Fix the "Y" word first
Ill choose football over auto correct every time (check your time stamp son)
Always have? Hmmm you remember what last year of football only.
Great Holiday Bowl win 10 years ago.
Thanks!... Nice getting your ass kicked by Alabama.. I thought you had a chance for the first 5 mins.
I'm an Alabama fan, but UW won your conference. No room to talk IMO.
You are an Alabama fan on a Huskies board with the name PurpleJ... Ok well congrats on losing the nation championship. If we don't get Lake we will come take Tosh fuck face.
Are you gonna hire Saban instead of Wilcox? Didn't think so. No proven coach wants to go to your shit program. Case closed. End of story.
I know your* being sarktastic, but both Wilcox and Baldwin are proven coaches.
Having Cooper Kupp and Bo-Jangles Whatever as QB doesn't make a proven coach.
I think that Baldwin did a good job at Eastern and is a decent offensive coach.
The issue with Cal though isn't offense (pretty sure they were #1 in the conference in scoring when we played them). There teams pretty consistently put up 40+ under Dykes... they just gave up 50+ at the same time.
The question will of course be Wilcox and what he can do defensively behind Lake or whoever is hired as DC. Wilcox had OK defenses here but like Sark the defenses wilted in big time games. Part of that was probably due to Sark being a offensive dumbfuck and giving the defense no rest and the other offense way too many possessions.
But look at what Wilcoxs defense did in the Big 10 championship game.
I'd take Wilcox over Dykes for sure though. Dykes was like a Mike Leach lite.
I wish he was like a Mike Leach lite. Man we could score, but I have never seen such bad defense. I think Wilcox will have our Defense playing much better, but we have no big DT/NT type DL. Our line last year was 250, 275, 285, 265... We then followed that up by only playing 2 LBs and were shocked we couldn't stop the run at all.
The switch the 3-4 Def is a must. IMO it is the best type of Def for college football. While a lot of people think we are light on LBs that just isnt' the case. Most of our DEs are way to light and would probably be more successful as an 3-4 OLB. Saffle, Weaver, etc. Looney at only 275 lbs is actually probably a dominate 3-4 DE. the problem we have is we don't have a monster NT like Vea.... I am typing all of this up and realize no one gives fuck... hahaha oh well.
Always have? Hmmm you remember what last year of football only.
Great Holiday Bowl win 10 years ago.
Thanks!... Nice getting your ass kicked by Alabama.. I thought you had a chance for the first 5 mins.
I'm an Alabama fan, but UW won your conference. No room to talk IMO.
You are an Alabama fan on a Huskies board with the name PurpleJ... Ok well congrats on losing the nation championship. If we don't get Lake we will come take Tosh fuck face.
Are you gonna hire Saban instead of Wilcox? Didn't think so. No proven coach wants to go to your shit program. Case closed. End of story.
I know your* being sarktastic, but both Wilcox and Baldwin are proven coaches.
Having Cooper Kupp and Bo-Jangles Whatever as QB doesn't make a proven coach.
I think that Baldwin did a good job at Eastern and is a decent offensive coach.
The issue with Cal though isn't offense (pretty sure they were #1 in the conference in scoring when we played them). There teams pretty consistently put up 40+ under Dykes... they just gave up 50+ at the same time.
The question will of course be Wilcox and what he can do defensively behind Lake or whoever is hired as DC. Wilcox had OK defenses here but like Sark the defenses wilted in big time games. Part of that was probably due to Sark being a offensive dumbfuck and giving the defense no rest and the other offense way too many possessions.
But look at what Wilcoxs defense did in the Big 10 championship game.
I'd take Wilcox over Dykes for sure though. Dykes was like a Mike Leach lite.
I wish he was like a Mike Leach lite. Man we could score, but I have never seen such bad defense. I think Wilcox will have our Defense playing much better, but we have no big DT/NT type DL. Our line last year was 250, 275, 285, 265... We then followed that up by only playing 2 LBs and were shocked we couldn't stop the run at all.
The switch the 3-4 Def is a must. IMO it is the best type of Def for college football. While a lot of people think we are light on LBs that just isnt' the case. Most of our DEs are way to light and would probably be more successful as an 3-4 OLB. Saffle, Weaver, etc. Looney at only 275 lbs is actually probably a dominate 3-4 DE. the problem we have is we don't have a monster NT like Vea.... I am typing all of this up and realize no one gives fuck... hahaha oh well.
You need a lot more than a NT like Vea.
True, but I meant in the sense that transition from a 4-2-5 with small DL to a 3-4 isn't so bad if you had a true NT. Those smaller DT transition out nicely to good size 3-4 DEs. Our mobile, but light DEs transition out nicely to Rush backers. Where a team like us would lack in transition is NT is all I meant and a beast like Vea would make any team much better. That guy is incredible and should have went into the draft!
If we had a better Def last year we would of had a good chance to be 8-4. Obviously things change if our Def was better and outcomes would be different, but give us Vea to help stop the run and switched to a 3-4 with better Def coaching and we weren't that far off.
Looks like Lake out recruiting for UW. Does not sound good for Cal. Who is the next person on the list for the DC job?
I will just say this.. If Jimmy Lake was officially staying you don't think Washington would be putting out notice to everyone that he isn't going anywhere. He still has a job to do.
Looks like Lake out recruiting for UW. Does not sound good for Cal. Who is the next person on the list for the DC job?
I will just say this.. If Jimmy Lake was officially staying you don't think Washington would be putting out notice to everyone that he isn't going anywhere. He still has a job to do.
I don't think that's Peterman's style. He likes to keep all the housekeeping type a shit in-house. If someone was leaving, then they would have put out a statement. He runs tight fucking ship, he will share least amount info with the people outside the program.
Looks like Lake out recruiting for UW. Does not sound good for Cal. Who is the next person on the list for the DC job?
I will just say this.. If Jimmy Lake was officially staying you don't think Washington would be putting out notice to everyone that he isn't going anywhere. He still has a job to do.
Are people plan on transferring from Cal with the new coaching staff? U guys need to fix the roster balance, doesn't call have like 20 WR on the team?
No we only have 12 Schollie WRs of which 2 are actually TEs. They were counting walk ons and such. I haven't heard anyone leaving... yet. Everyone actually seems pretty excited with the new staff. Sonny was wasn't close to the players that much so most either didn't really care or were happy. Now Spav, Peeler, and Jones leaving were kind of a big deal, but Wilcox is a players coach and everyone seems good right now. Greatwood so far has been well liked.
Comments
Not long before Pappy Waldorf gets credit for this
The issue with Cal though isn't offense (pretty sure they were #1 in the conference in scoring when we played them). There teams pretty consistently put up 40+ under Dykes... they just gave up 50+ at the same time.
The question will of course be Wilcox and what he can do defensively behind Lake or whoever is hired as DC. Wilcox had OK defenses here but like Sark the defenses wilted in big time games. Part of that was probably due to Sark being a offensive dumbfuck and giving the defense no rest and the other offense way too many possessions.
But look at what Wilcoxs defense did in the Big 10 championship game.
I'd take Wilcox over Dykes for sure though. Dykes was like a Mike Leach lite.
I don't think I got to see it, but it was satisfying to listen to the 56-17 drubbing that Cal gave UW in 2005. I remember Dawgman pussies keening about Cal piling on because Forsett had a relatively long TD run in the 4th quarter, as if somehow it's bad form for a backup to try not to get tackled. You don't want them to score on you, make a fucking stop. As a fan, bitch at your team for not making the fucking stop, not at the opposing team whose scrubs are trying to win more PT.
edit: goddammit I suck at editing
The switch the 3-4 Def is a must. IMO it is the best type of Def for college football. While a lot of people think we are light on LBs that just isnt' the case. Most of our DEs are way to light and would probably be more successful as an 3-4 OLB. Saffle, Weaver, etc. Looney at only 275 lbs is actually probably a dominate 3-4 DE. the problem we have is we don't have a monster NT like Vea.... I am typing all of this up and realize no one gives fuck... hahaha oh well.
HTH
If we had a better Def last year we would of had a good chance to be 8-4. Obviously things change if our Def was better and outcomes would be different, but give us Vea to help stop the run and switched to a 3-4 with better Def coaching and we weren't that far off.