Russia hack report released

As suspected, 100% democrat sore loser political opinions, no proof of allegations.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

So, hondo, what's the reason? Or you just gonna smoke weed and talk shit like UWhuskyskeet?

Lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/817180166942298113?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
Because Trump is friendly with them. Obama/Hillary isn't. I find it funny how many people in here needed to know the answer.
Russia gave millions to the Clinton foundation and from that Hillary helped to sell half of the US's future uranium production to a Russian company but you are worried about Trump being friendly with Putin. God you are a fucking moron.
Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?
The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH
Goodwin's Law in action.

HondoFS....
You can believe conspiracy theories. Or listen to the actual words from Trump and Putin.
I'll agree with you that The New York Times does publish a lot of conspiracy theories, but you are still an effin moron.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
If you knew how non profits work and get audited. You'd chuckle at the article.

That being said, I don't doubt that Russian people have donated to the Clinton foundation for access. That doesn't have anything to do with Putin preferring Trump in the white house rather than Hillary. He's come out and said as much multiple times. If you can't see that, I can't help you.
Just look up Uranium One.

Also would you please explain to me just what part of the "election" the Russians hacked? Voting machines? Polls? Registration rolls? State and federal election results?

You could just read the report.

" extends from hacking both Democratic and Republican targets to propaganda campaigns to troll-fueled social media disinformation. "

"findings that the Kremlin is behind breaches of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and even state election board websites."

NO they did not hack the election. They targeted both sides political machines but since the really criminal side had the cyber security equivalent of a TSA padlock they looked bad. As they should. They are criminals.

So how much they Paying Hondo and Jr. Hondo?

UWhuskytskeet

So, hondo, what's the reason? Or you just gonna smoke weed and talk shit like UWhuskyskeet?

Lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/817180166942298113?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
Because Trump is friendly with them. Obama/Hillary isn't. I find it funny how many people in here needed to know the answer.
Russia gave millions to the Clinton foundation and from that Hillary helped to sell half of the US's future uranium production to a Russian company but you are worried about Trump being friendly with Putin. God you are a fucking moron.
Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?
The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH
Goodwin's Law in action.

HondoFS....
You can believe conspiracy theories. Or listen to the actual words from Trump and Putin.
I'll agree with you that The New York Times does publish a lot of conspiracy theories, but you are still an effin moron.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
If you knew how non profits work and get audited. You'd chuckle at the article.

That being said, I don't doubt that Russian people have donated to the Clinton foundation for access. That doesn't have anything to do with Putin preferring Trump in the white house rather than Hillary. He's come out and said as much multiple times. If you can't see that, I can't help you.
Just look up Uranium One.

Also would you please explain to me just what part of the "election" the Russians hacked? Voting machines? Polls? Registration rolls? State and federal election results?

You could just read the report.
" extends from hacking both Democratic and Republican targets to propaganda campaigns to troll-fueled social media disinformation. "

"findings that the Kremlin is behind breaches of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and even state election board websites."

NO they did not hack the election. They targeted both sides political machines but since the really criminal side had the cyber security equivalent of a TSA padlock they looked bad. As they should. They are criminals.

So how much they Paying Hondo and Jr. Hondo?

I thought your question was genuine.

Hacking an election doesn't make sense, it's a term that technology-illiterate people use. I don't know how you can deny that Russia was behind the successful phishing attempt. It's pretty much a consensus among our intelligence agencies at this point.

If the phishing came from an American loosely tied to the right, I don't think many people would care. It would be brushed off as politics. It's getting attention because it came from Russia, and it was successful. I'm sure we do the same shit, but I never claimed we aren't hypocrites.

I get why you deny it though, you are still grasping onto the belief that Putin prefers Clinton to Trump. Embrace it Comrade.

doogie

p@ssw0rd

Sledog

So, hondo, what's the reason? Or you just gonna smoke weed and talk shit like UWhuskyskeet?

Lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/817180166942298113?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
Because Trump is friendly with them. Obama/Hillary isn't. I find it funny how many people in here needed to know the answer.
Russia gave millions to the Clinton foundation and from that Hillary helped to sell half of the US's future uranium production to a Russian company but you are worried about Trump being friendly with Putin. God you are a fucking moron.
Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?
The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH
Goodwin's Law in action.

HondoFS....
You can believe conspiracy theories. Or listen to the actual words from Trump and Putin.
I'll agree with you that The New York Times does publish a lot of conspiracy theories, but you are still an effin moron.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
If you knew how non profits work and get audited. You'd chuckle at the article.

That being said, I don't doubt that Russian people have donated to the Clinton foundation for access. That doesn't have anything to do with Putin preferring Trump in the white house rather than Hillary. He's come out and said as much multiple times. If you can't see that, I can't help you.
Just look up Uranium One.

Also would you please explain to me just what part of the "election" the Russians hacked? Voting machines? Polls? Registration rolls? State and federal election results?

You could just read the report.
" extends from hacking both Democratic and Republican targets to propaganda campaigns to troll-fueled social media disinformation. "

"findings that the Kremlin is behind breaches of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and even state election board websites."

NO they did not hack the election. They targeted both sides political machines but since the really criminal side had the cyber security equivalent of a TSA padlock they looked bad. As they should. They are criminals.

So how much they Paying Hondo and Jr. Hondo?
I thought your question was genuine.

Hacking an election doesn't make sense, it's a term that technology-illiterate people use. I don't know how you can deny that Russia was behind the successful phishing attempt. It's pretty much a consensus among our intelligence agencies at this point.

If the phishing came from an American loosely tied to the right, I don't think many people would care. It would be brushed off as politics. It's getting attention because it came from Russia, and it was successful. I'm sure we do the same shit, but I never claimed we aren't hypocrites.

I get why you deny it though, you are still grasping onto the belief that Putin prefers Clinton to Trump. Embrace it Comrade.

I'm not denying anything. If Russia did it they did it, that's not my point. My point is that the left doesn't care about the massive corruption and criminal activity going on with the Democratic Party and our government.

We meddle in other countries, including Russia, elections all the time. Ask Israel.

Sledog

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/01/07/was-fridays-declassified-report-claiming-russian-hacking-2016-election-rigged.html

dhdawg

So, hondo, what's the reason? Or you just gonna smoke weed and talk shit like UWhuskyskeet?

Lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/817180166942298113?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
Because Trump is friendly with them. Obama/Hillary isn't. I find it funny how many people in here needed to know the answer.
Russia gave millions to the Clinton foundation and from that Hillary helped to sell half of the US's future uranium production to a Russian company but you are worried about Trump being friendly with Putin. God you are a fucking moron.
Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?
The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH
Goodwin's Law in action.

HondoFS....
You can believe conspiracy theories. Or listen to the actual words from Trump and Putin.
I'll agree with you that The New York Times does publish a lot of conspiracy theories, but you are still an effin moron.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
If you knew how non profits work and get audited. You'd chuckle at the article.

That being said, I don't doubt that Russian people have donated to the Clinton foundation for access. That doesn't have anything to do with Putin preferring Trump in the white house rather than Hillary. He's come out and said as much multiple times. If you can't see that, I can't help you.
Just look up Uranium One.

Also would you please explain to me just what part of the "election" the Russians hacked? Voting machines? Polls? Registration rolls? State and federal election results?

You could just read the report.
" extends from hacking both Democratic and Republican targets to propaganda campaigns to troll-fueled social media disinformation. "

"findings that the Kremlin is behind breaches of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and even state election board websites."

NO they did not hack the election. They targeted both sides political machines but since the really criminal side had the cyber security equivalent of a TSA padlock they looked bad. As they should. They are criminals.

So how much they Paying Hondo and Jr. Hondo?
I thought your question was genuine.

Hacking an election doesn't make sense, it's a term that technology-illiterate people use. I don't know how you can deny that Russia was behind the successful phishing attempt. It's pretty much a consensus among our intelligence agencies at this point.

If the phishing came from an American loosely tied to the right, I don't think many people would care. It would be brushed off as politics. It's getting attention because it came from Russia, and it was successful. I'm sure we do the same shit, but I never claimed we aren't hypocrites.

I get why you deny it though, you are still grasping onto the belief that Putin prefers Clinton to Trump. Embrace it Comrade.
I'm not denying anything. If Russia did it they did it, that's not my point. My point is that the left doesn't care about the massive corruption and criminal activity going on with the Democratic Party and our government.

We meddle in other countries, including Russia, elections all the time. Ask Israel.

No democratic partisans don't. The left talks about it.

And all those things you just mentioned, the Republican party is worse. Definitely 10 times more corrupt.

2001400ex

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/01/07/was-fridays-declassified-report-claiming-russian-hacking-2016-election-rigged.html

I can't wait for honest Trump to get inaugurated so we can trust what comes from the Government again.

Sledog

So, hondo, what's the reason? Or you just gonna smoke weed and talk shit like UWhuskyskeet?

Lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/817180166942298113?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
Because Trump is friendly with them. Obama/Hillary isn't. I find it funny how many people in here needed to know the answer.
Russia gave millions to the Clinton foundation and from that Hillary helped to sell half of the US's future uranium production to a Russian company but you are worried about Trump being friendly with Putin. God you are a fucking moron.
Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?
The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH
Goodwin's Law in action.

HondoFS....
You can believe conspiracy theories. Or listen to the actual words from Trump and Putin.
I'll agree with you that The New York Times does publish a lot of conspiracy theories, but you are still an effin moron.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
If you knew how non profits work and get audited. You'd chuckle at the article.

That being said, I don't doubt that Russian people have donated to the Clinton foundation for access. That doesn't have anything to do with Putin preferring Trump in the white house rather than Hillary. He's come out and said as much multiple times. If you can't see that, I can't help you.
Just look up Uranium One.

Also would you please explain to me just what part of the "election" the Russians hacked? Voting machines? Polls? Registration rolls? State and federal election results?

You could just read the report.
" extends from hacking both Democratic and Republican targets to propaganda campaigns to troll-fueled social media disinformation. "

"findings that the Kremlin is behind breaches of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and even state election board websites."

NO they did not hack the election. They targeted both sides political machines but since the really criminal side had the cyber security equivalent of a TSA padlock they looked bad. As they should. They are criminals.

So how much they Paying Hondo and Jr. Hondo?
I thought your question was genuine.

Hacking an election doesn't make sense, it's a term that technology-illiterate people use. I don't know how you can deny that Russia was behind the successful phishing attempt. It's pretty much a consensus among our intelligence agencies at this point.

If the phishing came from an American loosely tied to the right, I don't think many people would care. It would be brushed off as politics. It's getting attention because it came from Russia, and it was successful. I'm sure we do the same shit, but I never claimed we aren't hypocrites.

I get why you deny it though, you are still grasping onto the belief that Putin prefers Clinton to Trump. Embrace it Comrade.
I'm not denying anything. If Russia did it they did it, that's not my point. My point is that the left doesn't care about the massive corruption and criminal activity going on with the Democratic Party and our government.

We meddle in other countries, including Russia, elections all the time. Ask Israel.
No democratic partisans don't. The left talks about it.

And all those things you just mentioned, the Republican party is worse. Definitely 10 times more corrupt.

Proof?

dhdawg

So, hondo, what's the reason? Or you just gonna smoke weed and talk shit like UWhuskyskeet?

Lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/817180166942298113?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
Because Trump is friendly with them. Obama/Hillary isn't. I find it funny how many people in here needed to know the answer.
Russia gave millions to the Clinton foundation and from that Hillary helped to sell half of the US's future uranium production to a Russian company but you are worried about Trump being friendly with Putin. God you are a fucking moron.
Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?
The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH
Goodwin's Law in action.

HondoFS....
You can believe conspiracy theories. Or listen to the actual words from Trump and Putin.
I'll agree with you that The New York Times does publish a lot of conspiracy theories, but you are still an effin moron.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
If you knew how non profits work and get audited. You'd chuckle at the article.

That being said, I don't doubt that Russian people have donated to the Clinton foundation for access. That doesn't have anything to do with Putin preferring Trump in the white house rather than Hillary. He's come out and said as much multiple times. If you can't see that, I can't help you.
Just look up Uranium One.

Also would you please explain to me just what part of the "election" the Russians hacked? Voting machines? Polls? Registration rolls? State and federal election results?

You could just read the report.
" extends from hacking both Democratic and Republican targets to propaganda campaigns to troll-fueled social media disinformation. "

"findings that the Kremlin is behind breaches of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and even state election board websites."

NO they did not hack the election. They targeted both sides political machines but since the really criminal side had the cyber security equivalent of a TSA padlock they looked bad. As they should. They are criminals.

So how much they Paying Hondo and Jr. Hondo?
I thought your question was genuine.

Hacking an election doesn't make sense, it's a term that technology-illiterate people use. I don't know how you can deny that Russia was behind the successful phishing attempt. It's pretty much a consensus among our intelligence agencies at this point.

If the phishing came from an American loosely tied to the right, I don't think many people would care. It would be brushed off as politics. It's getting attention because it came from Russia, and it was successful. I'm sure we do the same shit, but I never claimed we aren't hypocrites.

I get why you deny it though, you are still grasping onto the belief that Putin prefers Clinton to Trump. Embrace it Comrade.
I'm not denying anything. If Russia did it they did it, that's not my point. My point is that the left doesn't care about the massive corruption and criminal activity going on with the Democratic Party and our government.

We meddle in other countries, including Russia, elections all the time. Ask Israel.
No democratic partisans don't. The left talks about it.

And all those things you just mentioned, the Republican party is worse. Definitely 10 times more corrupt.
Proof?

Proof? You're as bad as hillary when she wanted a prid-quo-pro proving her corruption.
Look at trump's cabinet ffs. It's full of donors.

They do a good job of hiding it. Trying to gut the epa, opposing any sort of bank regulation while supporting bailouts, their trade policy that trunp exposed, their tax proposals, it's all meant to favor their donors. Look at the god damn first thing they did after taking office. Gutting the office on congressional ethics.
Can you point to examples of democrats selling out to their donors? Sure. Obamacare is an example. Republicans are worse

ThomasFremont

So, hondo, what's the reason? Or you just gonna smoke weed and talk shit like UWhuskyskeet?

Lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/817180166942298113?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
Because Trump is friendly with them. Obama/Hillary isn't. I find it funny how many people in here needed to know the answer.
Russia gave millions to the Clinton foundation and from that Hillary helped to sell half of the US's future uranium production to a Russian company but you are worried about Trump being friendly with Putin. God you are a fucking moron.
Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?
The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH
Goodwin's Law in action.

HondoFS....
You can believe conspiracy theories. Or listen to the actual words from Trump and Putin.
I'll agree with you that The New York Times does publish a lot of conspiracy theories, but you are still an effin moron.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
If you knew how non profits work and get audited. You'd chuckle at the article.

That being said, I don't doubt that Russian people have donated to the Clinton foundation for access. That doesn't have anything to do with Putin preferring Trump in the white house rather than Hillary. He's come out and said as much multiple times. If you can't see that, I can't help you.
Just look up Uranium One.

Also would you please explain to me just what part of the "election" the Russians hacked? Voting machines? Polls? Registration rolls? State and federal election results?

You could just read the report.
" extends from hacking both Democratic and Republican targets to propaganda campaigns to troll-fueled social media disinformation. "

"findings that the Kremlin is behind breaches of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and even state election board websites."

NO they did not hack the election. They targeted both sides political machines but since the really criminal side had the cyber security equivalent of a TSA padlock they looked bad. As they should. They are criminals.

So how much they Paying Hondo and Jr. Hondo?
I thought your question was genuine.

Hacking an election doesn't make sense, it's a term that technology-illiterate people use. I don't know how you can deny that Russia was behind the successful phishing attempt. It's pretty much a consensus among our intelligence agencies at this point.

If the phishing came from an American loosely tied to the right, I don't think many people would care. It would be brushed off as politics. It's getting attention because it came from Russia, and it was successful. I'm sure we do the same shit, but I never claimed we aren't hypocrites.

I get why you deny it though, you are still grasping onto the belief that Putin prefers Clinton to Trump. Embrace it Comrade.
I'm not denying anything. If Russia did it they did it, that's not my point. My point is that the left doesn't care about the massive corruption and criminal activity going on with the Democratic Party and our government.

We meddle in other countries, including Russia, elections all the time. Ask Israel.

We? invade and/or bomb other countries all the time too.

Doesn't mean I want it happening to us.

HoustonHusky

Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?
The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH

Why do you keep posting?

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/01/07/was-fridays-declassified-report-claiming-russian-hacking-2016-election-rigged.html
I can't wait for honest Trump to get inaugurated so we can trust what comes from the Government again.

BennyBeaver

I certainly take Trumps word over Obama's. I most certainly would like to see some evidence before picking a War with Russia by a lame dick choosing scorched earth on his way out the back door.
There's a reason Russia wants Trump in and not Obama/Hillary. It's awesome that you don't see it. Cause no way could your guy be corrupt.

What's the reason?

BennyBeaver

I certainly take Trumps word over Obama's. I most certainly would like to see some evidence before picking a War with Russia by a lame dick choosing scorched earth on his way out the back door.
There's a reason Russia wants Trump in and not Obama/Hillary. It's awesome that you don't see it. Cause no way could your guy be corrupt.

What's the reason?

2001400ex

Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?
The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH

Why do you keep posting?
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/01/07/was-fridays-declassified-report-claiming-russian-hacking-2016-election-rigged.html
I can't wait for honest Trump to get inaugurated so we can trust what comes from the Government again.

Because people like you think Trump is honest and will restore integrity to the white house. And think Republicans are honest and will restore integrity to Congress. And think your news media is honest and magically we will have a great economy 1 day into Trump's presidency. Of course Trump was the reason why.

HoustonHusky

Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?
The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH

Why do you keep posting?
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/01/07/was-fridays-declassified-report-claiming-russian-hacking-2016-election-rigged.html
I can't wait for honest Trump to get inaugurated so we can trust what comes from the Government again.

Because people like you think Trump is honest and will restore integrity to the white house. And think Republicans are honest and will restore integrity to Congress. And think your news media is honest and magically we will have a great economy 1 day into Trump's presidency. Of course Trump was the reason why.

That's a lot of words you've put in my mouth...feel free to back any of it up. Or don't like you normally do in showing off your speed limit IQ.

After all, you are the moron that thinks anyone who disagrees with you must be a Nazi.

2001400ex

Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?
The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH

Why do you keep posting?
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/01/07/was-fridays-declassified-report-claiming-russian-hacking-2016-election-rigged.html
I can't wait for honest Trump to get inaugurated so we can trust what comes from the Government again.

Because people like you think Trump is honest and will restore integrity to the white house. And think Republicans are honest and will restore integrity to Congress. And think your news media is honest and magically we will have a great economy 1 day into Trump's presidency. Of course Trump was the reason why.
That's a lot of words you've put in my mouth...feel free to back any of it up. Or don't like you normally do in showing off your speed limit IQ.

After all, you are the moron that thinks anyone who disagrees with you must be a Nazi.

You don't get sarcasm do you? Trump isn't a Nazi. Same thing I said when Republicans were saying Obama would turn is into a dictatorship. There's zero chance of that happening. The country is stronger than one person.

That being said, whatch your news sources. You won't hear anything about labor force participation other than "look it's going up cause of Trump!!!". And deficits won't matter anymore. Etc.

doogie

Nobody in media or politics claimed this was a simple amature level phishing attempt.

Sledog

Odd how the new guy, who was far from my first choice, is already convicted of illegal activity by the lefties who remain silent while looking at overwhelming evidence of corruption, dishonesty and treason.

Ok so no "proof" from you . How about some simple accusations of Trumps lawlessness?

Has he taken millions in donations and then provided political favors for those dollars? Just what has he allegedly done that is even close to what we know has occurred in the current criminal enterprise?

HoustonHusky

Sarcasm now...yeah, that's it. That's the ticket.

And HondoFS "lecturing" anyone on numbers or news sources is just comical...oh the bubble he lives in.

Numbers are numbers...the deficit is important, and the fact the last guy ran it up almost $10 trillion in 8 years is a HUGE problem. Does put the recent outrage of some of the estimated cost of a border wall into perspective however...