Russia hack report released

Sledog said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

doogie said:

So, hondo, what's the reason? Or you just gonna smoke weed and talk shit like UWhuskyskeet?

Lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/817180166942298113?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

Because Trump is friendly with them. Obama/Hillary isn't. I find it funny how many people in here needed to know the answer.

Russia gave millions to the Clinton foundation and from that Hillary helped to sell half of the US's future uranium production to a Russian company but you are worried about Trump being friendly with Putin. God you are a fucking moron.

2001400ex said:

doogie said:

Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?

The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH

Goodwin's Law in action.

HondoFS....

You can believe conspiracy theories. Or listen to the actual words from Trump and Putin.

I'll agree with you that The New York Times does publish a lot of conspiracy theories, but you are still an effin moron.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

If you knew how non profits work and get audited. You'd chuckle at the article.

That being said, I don't doubt that Russian people have donated to the Clinton foundation for access. That doesn't have anything to do with Putin preferring Trump in the white house rather than Hillary. He's come out and said as much multiple times. If you can't see that, I can't help you.

Just look up Uranium One.

Also would you please explain to me just what part of the "election" the Russians hacked? Voting machines? Polls? Registration rolls? State and federal election results?

You could just read the report.

" extends from hacking both Democratic and Republican targets to propaganda campaigns to troll-fueled social media disinformation. "

"findings that the Kremlin is behind breaches of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and even state election board websites."

NO they did not hack the election. They targeted both sides political machines but since the really criminal side had the cyber security equivalent of a TSA padlock they looked bad. As they should. They are criminals.

So how much they Paying Hondo and Jr. Hondo?

I thought your question was genuine.

Hacking an election doesn't make sense, it's a term that technology-illiterate people use. I don't know how you can deny that Russia was behind the successful phishing attempt. It's pretty much a consensus among our intelligence agencies at this point.

If the phishing came from an American loosely tied to the right, I don't think many people would care. It would be brushed off as politics. It's getting attention because it came from Russia, and it was successful. I'm sure we do the same shit, but I never claimed we aren't hypocrites.

I get why you deny it though, you are still grasping onto the belief that Putin prefers Clinton to Trump. Embrace it Comrade.

UWhuskytskeet said:

Sledog said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

doogie said:

So, hondo, what's the reason? Or you just gonna smoke weed and talk shit like UWhuskyskeet?

Lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/817180166942298113?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

Because Trump is friendly with them. Obama/Hillary isn't. I find it funny how many people in here needed to know the answer.

Russia gave millions to the Clinton foundation and from that Hillary helped to sell half of the US's future uranium production to a Russian company but you are worried about Trump being friendly with Putin. God you are a fucking moron.

2001400ex said:

doogie said:

Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?

The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH

Goodwin's Law in action.

HondoFS....

You can believe conspiracy theories. Or listen to the actual words from Trump and Putin.

I'll agree with you that The New York Times does publish a lot of conspiracy theories, but you are still an effin moron.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

If you knew how non profits work and get audited. You'd chuckle at the article.

That being said, I don't doubt that Russian people have donated to the Clinton foundation for access. That doesn't have anything to do with Putin preferring Trump in the white house rather than Hillary. He's come out and said as much multiple times. If you can't see that, I can't help you.

Just look up Uranium One.

Also would you please explain to me just what part of the "election" the Russians hacked? Voting machines? Polls? Registration rolls? State and federal election results?

You could just read the report.

" extends from hacking both Democratic and Republican targets to propaganda campaigns to troll-fueled social media disinformation. "

"findings that the Kremlin is behind breaches of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and even state election board websites."

NO they did not hack the election. They targeted both sides political machines but since the really criminal side had the cyber security equivalent of a TSA padlock they looked bad. As they should. They are criminals.

So how much they Paying Hondo and Jr. Hondo?

I thought your question was genuine.

Hacking an election doesn't make sense, it's a term that technology-illiterate people use. I don't know how you can deny that Russia was behind the successful phishing attempt. It's pretty much a consensus among our intelligence agencies at this point.

If the phishing came from an American loosely tied to the right, I don't think many people would care. It would be brushed off as politics. It's getting attention because it came from Russia, and it was successful. I'm sure we do the same shit, but I never claimed we aren't hypocrites.

I get why you deny it though, you are still grasping onto the belief that Putin prefers Clinton to Trump. Embrace it Comrade.

I'm not denying anything. If Russia did it they did it, that's not my point. My point is that the left doesn't care about the massive corruption and criminal activity going on with the Democratic Party and our government.

We meddle in other countries, including Russia, elections all the time. Ask Israel.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/01/07/was-fridays-declassified-report-claiming-russian-hacking-2016-election-rigged.html

Sledog said:

dhdawg said:

Sledog said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

Sledog said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

doogie said:

So, hondo, what's the reason? Or you just gonna smoke weed and talk shit like UWhuskyskeet?

Lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/817180166942298113?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

Because Trump is friendly with them. Obama/Hillary isn't. I find it funny how many people in here needed to know the answer.

Russia gave millions to the Clinton foundation and from that Hillary helped to sell half of the US's future uranium production to a Russian company but you are worried about Trump being friendly with Putin. God you are a fucking moron.

2001400ex said:

doogie said:

Oh, so now it's "relationship" snicker

You DID see today's NY TIMES poll that says more than 81% believe wiki leaks while 17% believe the Intel report, right?

The distrust in media and government is what allowed Hitler to flourish.

HTH

Goodwin's Law in action.

HondoFS....

You can believe conspiracy theories. Or listen to the actual words from Trump and Putin.

I'll agree with you that The New York Times does publish a lot of conspiracy theories, but you are still an effin moron.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

If you knew how non profits work and get audited. You'd chuckle at the article.

That being said, I don't doubt that Russian people have donated to the Clinton foundation for access. That doesn't have anything to do with Putin preferring Trump in the white house rather than Hillary. He's come out and said as much multiple times. If you can't see that, I can't help you.

Just look up Uranium One.

Also would you please explain to me just what part of the "election" the Russians hacked? Voting machines? Polls? Registration rolls? State and federal election results?

You could just read the report.

" extends from hacking both Democratic and Republican targets to propaganda campaigns to troll-fueled social media disinformation. "

"findings that the Kremlin is behind breaches of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and even state election board websites."

NO they did not hack the election. They targeted both sides political machines but since the really criminal side had the cyber security equivalent of a TSA padlock they looked bad. As they should. They are criminals.

So how much they Paying Hondo and Jr. Hondo?

I thought your question was genuine.

Hacking an election doesn't make sense, it's a term that technology-illiterate people use. I don't know how you can deny that Russia was behind the successful phishing attempt. It's pretty much a consensus among our intelligence agencies at this point.

If the phishing came from an American loosely tied to the right, I don't think many people would care. It would be brushed off as politics. It's getting attention because it came from Russia, and it was successful. I'm sure we do the same shit, but I never claimed we aren't hypocrites.

I get why you deny it though, you are still grasping onto the belief that Putin prefers Clinton to Trump. Embrace it Comrade.

I'm not denying anything. If Russia did it they did it, that's not my point. My point is that the left doesn't care about the massive corruption and criminal activity going on with the Democratic Party and our government.

We meddle in other countries, including Russia, elections all the time. Ask Israel.

No democratic partisans don't. The left talks about it.


And all those things you just mentioned, the Republican party is worse. Definitely 10 times more corrupt.

Proof?

Proof? You're as bad as hillary when she wanted a prid-quo-pro proving her corruption.
Look at trump's cabinet ffs. It's full of donors.

They do a good job of hiding it. Trying to gut the epa, opposing any sort of bank regulation while supporting bailouts, their trade policy that trunp exposed, their tax proposals, it's all meant to favor their donors. Look at the god damn first thing they did after taking office. Gutting the office on congressional ethics.
Can you point to examples of democrats selling out to their donors? Sure. Obamacare is an example. Republicans are worse