Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

It's Really Simple ...

Tequilla
Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
in Hardcore Husky Board
Needed to win turnover margin ... instead -2 for -10 points in 1st half

Bama dumbed down offense to be one read and run for Hurts ...

We were doing a lot of good things with motions and shifts working way down field ... TD to Pettis really well defined ...

Then we got greedy when 10-7 down at half with shit field position all half was ok ...

Nick Harris has gotten owned all half ... blitz on pick 6 was right at RG/C gap
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    greedy? we were at the 30 yard line when browning threw the pick
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    There's not a lot there on either run/pass ... Ross is not an option on any non crossing routes IMO because they are ALWAYS doubling over the top which allows squatting on shorter routes
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    edited December 2016
    RUNNING THE FUCKING BALL IS A GOOD START
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • godawgst
    godawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,554 Swaye's Wigwam
    Tequilla said:

    dhdawg said:

    greedy? we were at the 30 yard line when browning threw the pick

    With that field position 2 first downs = go into half down 3 and regroup ...

    That being said Jake can't throw that ball
    That play was essentially the nail in our coffin.

    Couldn't agree more with you about going into half down 10-7.

    The reward wasn't worth the risk.

    If you pop one for 15-20 yards via the run, then call a t.o. and go after points.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AEB
    AEB Member Posts: 2,994
    Tequilla said:

    Needed to win turnover margin ... instead -2 for -10 points in 1st half

    Bama dumbed down offense to be one read and run for Hurts ...

    We were doing a lot of good things with motions and shifts working way down field ... TD to Pettis really well defined ...

    Then we got greedy when 10-7 down at half with shit field position all half was ok ...

    Nick Harris has gotten owned all half ... blitz on pick 6 was right at RG/C gap

    McGary missed the read on this play. He looks to his left and he sees the blitzer. His man faded back and had the INT. That's a play made by an inexperienced OT.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • montyfranklyn
    montyfranklyn Member Posts: 119
    I keep seeing some of you all post that UW should have just kept running the ball. Do you think a 3 yard and a cloud of dust strategy would have worked in the 2nd half?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369
    edited January 2017
    montyfranklyn said:

    I keep seeing some of you all post that UW should have just kept running the ball. Do you think a 3 yard and a cloud of dust strategy would have worked in the 2nd half?

    You're on to Clemson. Thanks for the visiting. Now, fuck off and LEAVE!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,270
    montyfranklyn said:

    I keep seeing some of you all post that UW should have just kept running the ball. Do you think a 3 yard and a cloud of dust strategy would have worked in the 2nd half?

    Had we run and gone in to half down 10-7 the score would have put more pressure on Bama to not fuck up. Freshman QB with that extra pressure would given us more of a shot. Doubt we would have been able to score though.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,758
    whlinder said:

    montyfranklyn said:

    I keep seeing some of you all post that UW should have just kept running the ball. Do you think a 3 yard and a cloud of dust strategy would have worked in the 2nd half?

    Had we run and gone in to half down 10-7 the score would have put more pressure on Bama to not fuck up. Freshman QB with that extra pressure would given us more of a shot. Doubt we would have been able to score though.

    We all knew SmithFS would strike.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • montyfranklyn
    montyfranklyn Member Posts: 119
    Swaye said:

    montyfranklyn said:

    whlinder said:

    montyfranklyn said:

    I keep seeing some of you all post that UW should have just kept running the ball. Do you think a 3 yard and a cloud of dust strategy would have worked in the 2nd half?

    Had we run and gone in to half down 10-7 the score would have put more pressure on Bama to not fuck up. Freshman QB with that extra pressure would given us more of a shot. Doubt we would have been able to score though.

    True. I think if UW had stuck with the run and settle for 3 yards and a cloud of dust and moved the ball, it would have opened up the play action if it would have made us walk a safety up. We were able to stop UW's pass because we had two safeties over the top all night and dropped the LBs back in coverage.
    Our OC is a retarded monkey who always abandons the run at the first sign of trouble. We hope he catches on fire today.
    Not really. Bama was able to stop the run with the front 7 and get pressure with the down 4. With that being the case, Bama was able to drop 7 in coverage. With them being able to get pressure with the down 4 and some times 5, Washington had to commit an extra player or two to stop the pass rush in the TE and/or RB. With that being the case that left Washington with only 3 or 4 going out in routes being defended by 6 or 7. This made the windows for throws very small and made passing very hard.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369
    montyfranklyn said:

    Baseman said:

    montyfranklyn said:

    I keep seeing some of you all post that UW should have just kept running the ball. Do you think a 3 yard and a cloud of dust strategy would have worked in the 2nd half?

    You're on to Clemson. Thanks for the visiting. Now, fuck off and LEAVE!
    Nah I'm going to stick around. I like this place
    I'd recommend Swayes Wigwam (We need to keep OUR Pirate Ship afloat). Derek, will help you with the arrangements.

    In the interim, PM @IrishDawg22 to get dialed in and for a HH welcome kit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    AEB said:

    Tequilla said:

    Needed to win turnover margin ... instead -2 for -10 points in 1st half

    Bama dumbed down offense to be one read and run for Hurts ...

    We were doing a lot of good things with motions and shifts working way down field ... TD to Pettis really well defined ...

    Then we got greedy when 10-7 down at half with shit field position all half was ok ...

    Nick Harris has gotten owned all half ... blitz on pick 6 was right at RG/C gap

    McGary missed the read on this play. He looks to his left and he sees the blitzer. His man faded back and had the INT. That's a play made by an inexperienced OT.
    I'm not 100% on this but this was obviously great design by Alabama ...

    Harris slid in for a double team block with Shelton exposing the hole ...

    What to me it exposes is how you can be vulnerable on the OL when you have to help because asking McGary to read that peel off BEFORE it happens AND get to the inside is asking a lot ...

    And the idea of just turning him loose on the outside IF he was coming is insanely dangerous
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,753 Standard Supporter
    Swaye said:

    Baseman said:

    montyfranklyn said:

    Baseman said:

    montyfranklyn said:

    I keep seeing some of you all post that UW should have just kept running the ball. Do you think a 3 yard and a cloud of dust strategy would have worked in the 2nd half?

    You're on to Clemson. Thanks for the visiting. Now, fuck off and LEAVE!
    Nah I'm going to stick around. I like this place
    I'd recommend Swayes Wigwam (We need to keep OUR Pirate Ship afloat). Derek, will help you with the arrangements.

    In the interim, PM @IrishDawg22 to get dialed in and for a HH welcome kit.
    Just to tempt him more, a photo of the welcome basket:

    image
    If it's not a real sweat lodge with some Greco Roman wrestling thrown in I'm out!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:

    Swaye said:

    Baseman said:

    montyfranklyn said:

    Baseman said:

    montyfranklyn said:

    I keep seeing some of you all post that UW should have just kept running the ball. Do you think a 3 yard and a cloud of dust strategy would have worked in the 2nd half?

    You're on to Clemson. Thanks for the visiting. Now, fuck off and LEAVE!
    Nah I'm going to stick around. I like this place
    I'd recommend Swayes Wigwam (We need to keep OUR Pirate Ship afloat). Derek, will help you with the arrangements.

    In the interim, PM @IrishDawg22 to get dialed in and for a HH welcome kit.
    Just to tempt him more, a photo of the welcome basket:

    image
    If it's not a real sweat lodge with some Greco Roman wrestling thrown in I'm out!
    I always knew you would dial this place in.

    I just didn't think it would happen so soon.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129
    edited January 2017
    Tequilla said:

    AEB said:

    Tequilla said:

    Needed to win turnover margin ... instead -2 for -10 points in 1st half

    Bama dumbed down offense to be one read and run for Hurts ...

    We were doing a lot of good things with motions and shifts working way down field ... TD to Pettis really well defined ...

    Then we got greedy when 10-7 down at half with shit field position all half was ok ...

    Nick Harris has gotten owned all half ... blitz on pick 6 was right at RG/C gap

    McGary missed the read on this play. He looks to his left and he sees the blitzer. His man faded back and had the INT. That's a play made by an inexperienced OT.
    I'm not 100% on this but this was obviously great design by Alabama ...

    Harris slid in for a double team block with Shelton exposing the hole ...

    What to me it exposes is how you can be vulnerable on the OL when you have to help because asking McGary to read that peel off BEFORE it happens AND get to the inside is asking a lot ...

    And the idea of just turning him loose on the outside IF he was coming is insanely dangerous
    Tough to know whose fault it was. Pete said post game it was a terrible play call for that blitz.

    I would be interested to watch UW coaches break it down because I honestly don't know.

    Saban and Alabama's DC won the chess match on that play. RB does not stay in to protect and a guy comes in untouched.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    backthepack said:

    RUNNING THE FUCKING BALL IS A GOOD START

    No Pac 10 team will ever run the ball successfully against Bama and win. That's like saying it's possible @Passion can stop being a doog.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • tenndawg
    tenndawg Member Posts: 1,161
    Je-zuz fuck man

    This place is ascending to the realm of opening discussing His & His self lubricating spiked anal rammers and some of you are interjecting foitball comments ?

    RED ZONE could have a hole new meaning
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    tenndawg said:

    Je-zuz fuck man

    This place is ascending to the realm of opening discussing His & His self lubricating spiked anal rammers and some of you are interjecting foitball comments ?

    RED ZONE could have a hole new meaning

    This place is a 50/50 proposition.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,288 Founders Club
    montyfranklyn said:

    I keep seeing some of you all post that UW should have just kept running the ball. Do you think a 3 yard and a cloud of dust strategy would have worked in the 2nd half?

    Yes and that's even down 10 points. You keep plugging away at the run and get 3-3.5 yards. Make Bama start to respect that then go to some play action or motion to empty/1-back set for quick throws.

    The result might still 24-7 at the end of the game but it's a better fucking chance of being something other than 24-7 if you go down running.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,753 Standard Supporter
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Sledog said:

    Swaye said:

    Baseman said:

    montyfranklyn said:

    Baseman said:

    montyfranklyn said:

    I keep seeing some of you all post that UW should have just kept running the ball. Do you think a 3 yard and a cloud of dust strategy would have worked in the 2nd half?

    You're on to Clemson. Thanks for the visiting. Now, fuck off and LEAVE!
    Nah I'm going to stick around. I like this place
    I'd recommend Swayes Wigwam (We need to keep OUR Pirate Ship afloat). Derek, will help you with the arrangements.

    In the interim, PM @IrishDawg22 to get dialed in and for a HH welcome kit.
    Just to tempt him more, a photo of the welcome basket:

    image
    If it's not a real sweat lodge with some Greco Roman wrestling thrown in I'm out!
    I always knew you would dial this place in.

    I just didn't think it would happen so soon.
    Sven I just like dialing up your blood pressure.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter