Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Washington success fueled by in-state talent shift

2»

Comments

  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072

    Yeah but how is the pac-12 a shit conference?

    And how is the SEC a shit conference as well?
    Washington has the most first team p12 players in program history, this isn't our best team, so defecto, the conference is a dumpster fire this year, but we already knew that.
    2nd best team since 91. It would be tough to bet against the 2000 team because they always found a way, but this team is a lot better talent and coaching wise.

    The only spots the 2000 team is better at are OLB, TE, and QB. Our TE's and QB are good too, but Tui and Stevens were great.
    The team has performed the best since 91, but I have a hard time thinking a line with 1 frosh and 2 sophs is as elite as they've looked.
    Alabama starts a frosh, soph and 2 jr's. How do they look?
  • Thump
    Thump Member Posts: 793
    doogie said:

    Yeah but how is the pac-12 a shit conference?

    And how is the SEC a shit conference as well?
    Washington has the most first team p12 players in program history, this isn't our best team, so defecto, the conference is a dumpster fire this year, but we already knew that.
    2nd best team since 91. It would be tough to bet against the 2000 team because they always found a way, but this team is a lot better talent and coaching wise.

    The only spots the 2000 team is better at are OLB, TE, and QB. Our TE's and QB are good too, but Tui and Stevens were great.
    The team has performed the best since 91, but I have a hard time thinking a line with 1 frosh and 2 sophs is as elite as they've looked.
    Alabama starts a frosh, soph and 2 jr's. How do they look?
    Like a team that LSU or Ole Miss could have beat.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,603 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited December 2016

    Yeah but how is the pac-12 a shit conference?

    And how is the SEC a shit conference as well?
    Washington has the most first team p12 players in program history, this isn't our best team, so defecto, the conference is a dumpster fire this year, but we already knew that.
    2nd best team since 91. It would be tough to bet against the 2000 team because they always found a way, but this team is a lot better talent and coaching wise.

    The only spots the 2000 team is better at are OLB, TE, and QB. Our TE's and QB are good too, but Tui and Stevens were great.
    The team has performed the best since 91, but I have a hard time thinking a line with 1 frosh and 2 sophs is as elite as they've looked.
    Adams and McGary >>>> Silvers and Wes Call. The 2000 team had a good line, but this one is better. Throw in Dissly/Sample and it's not close.

    Rapp/JoJo/Budda >> Akbar/CW/Carothers.. The safeties on the 2000 team were good too.

    Omare Lowe was a pretty good CB, but Jones and King are way better.

    The 2000 team could probably beat this one, especially considering they beat Miami, but talent wise, it's not close.

    Off the 2000 team that would start on this year's team.

    Tui
    Chad Ward at G
    Stevens
    Triplett (the 3 we have now would play a lot)
    Pharms
    The OG Darrell Daniels (maybe)
    Akbar
    Elstrom would be Ross/Pettis top backup

    Starters/contributors on the 2000 team like Alexis/Hurst, Mahdavi, Ryan Julian, DJ/Roc/Massey, and Wes Call wouldn't touch the field.

    2000 was a 8-9 win team willed by Tui to 11 wins. This year's team actually has top flight talent with way more future pro's than 2000.
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 6,017
    edited December 2016

    Yeah but how is the pac-12 a shit conference?

    And how is the SEC a shit conference as well?
    Washington has the most first team p12 players in program history, this isn't our best team, so defecto, the conference is a dumpster fire this year, but we already knew that.
    2nd best team since 91. It would be tough to bet against the 2000 team because they always found a way, but this team is a lot better talent and coaching wise.

    The only spots the 2000 team is better at are OLB, TE, and QB. Our TE's and QB are good too, but Tui and Stevens were great.
    The team has performed the best since 91, but I have a hard time thinking a line with 1 frosh and 2 sophs is as elite as they've looked.
    Adams and McGary >>>> Silvers and Wes Call. The 2000 team had a good line, but this one is better. Throw in Dissly/Sample and it's not close.

    Rapp/JoJo/Budda >> Akbar/CW/Carothers.. The safeties on the 2000 team were good too.

    Omare Lowe was a pretty good CB, but Jones and King are way better.

    The 2000 team could probably beat this one, especially considering they beat Miami, but talent wise, it's not close.

    Off the 2000 team that would start on this year's team.

    Tui
    Chad Ward at G
    Stevens
    Triplett (the 3 we have now would play a lot)
    Pharms
    The OG Darrell Daniels (maybe)
    Akbar
    Elstrom would be Ross/Pettis top backup

    Starters/contributors on the 2000 team like Alexis/Hurst, Mahdavi, Ryan Julian, DJ/Roc/Massey, and Wes Call wouldn't touch the field.

    2000 was a 8-9 win team willed by Tui to 11 wins. This year's team actually has top flight talent with way more future pro's than 2000.
    I still think it's an overal talent issue. For example, The two corners behind that redshirted aren't even on the depth chart this year. You have two first rounders Leaving and talent in place to step in and be stars.... and if they aren't Pete and Lake recruited more guys who will be.