I'm excited for the return to the 80s
https://www.yahoo.com/news/let-it-be-an-arms-race-trump-doubles-down-on-nuclear-proliferation-153229263.html
Comments
-
Most people are looking ahead toward the future while snowflakes seem to be having a hard time functioning trying to process defeat.
-
The 80s were awesome and we were oblivious to the ongoing tension between the US and USSR. One simply didn't live their life and every waking moment in fear of what might happen.
Snowflakes need to unplug for awhile, figure out how to make some incredible music and party like it 2099. Taking all this shit way too serious all the time.
-
Yes the 80's. Booming economy, rebuilding of a devastated military and the collapse of the Soviet Union without firing a shot. Ronnie Raygun as president fixing the Dem's debacles and setting the world back on track.
Everything you want with little of the liberal bullshit! -
If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?doogie said:Most people are looking ahead toward the future while snowflakes seem to be having a hard time functioning trying to process defeat.
Troomps will stand by Trump no matter what. Nice work. -
You should probably build a bomb shelter2001400ex said:
If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?doogie said:Most people are looking ahead toward the future while snowflakes seem to be having a hard time functioning trying to process defeat.
Troomps will stand by Trump no matter what. Nice work.
And then kill yourself -
No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.2001400ex said:
If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all? -
I've learned a long time ago not to read any of the manipulative #fakenews you post.
Now you want me to invest in snowflake theory by some butthurt loser? -
With Trump you don't need fake news, you just read his tweets.doogie said:I've learned a long time ago not to read any of the manipulative #fakenews you post.
Now you want me to invest in snowflake theory by some butthurt loser? -
His tweets are the news dumbass
-
We have enough nukes to destroy the entire world. Literally. Why do we need more? And why do we need to threaten the use of them? Threatening the use of nukes is the opposite of "sanity and global understanding from our leadership". If you haven't been paying attention, our enemy isn't a state, it's rogue idiots with which a nuke won't help.Purple_Pills said:
No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.2001400ex said:
If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?
Your stupidity is astonishing. -
Ironic
-
The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.Purple_Pills said:
No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.2001400ex said:
If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?
You sycophants can feel free to remove Donald's cock from your mouths and come to your own conclusions any day now. Quit fear mongering.
Speaking of the 80's...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xxgRUyzgs0 -
and if other countries see the US and Russia loading up, they will say the same thing. but keep fearmongeringPurple_Pills said:
No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.2001400ex said:
If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all? -
the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.UWhuskytskeet said:
The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.Purple_Pills said:
No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.2001400ex said:
If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?
and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race? -
You only worry about how we pay for things when it involves helping people. If it involves killing people there's always money.dhdawg said:
the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.UWhuskytskeet said:
The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.Purple_Pills said:
No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.2001400ex said:
If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?
and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race? -
We know how you feel about tweets you don't understand but the real question is: How do you feel about the actual LEGISLATION OBAMA SIGNED TODAY that escellates the arms race in space and missile defense programs?dhdawg said:
the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.UWhuskytskeet said:
The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.Purple_Pills said:
No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.2001400ex said:
If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?
and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?
#fakeoutrage -
I don't like it. because unlike you I'm not married to a political god and agree with everything he says and does.doogie said:
We know how you feel about tweets you don't understand but the real question is: How do you feel about the actual LEGISLATION OBAMA SIGNED TODAY that escellates the arms race in space and missile defense programs?dhdawg said:
the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.UWhuskytskeet said:
The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.Purple_Pills said:
No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.2001400ex said:
If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?
and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?
#fakeoutrage
your republican butt buddies in congress loved it too
-
but Twitter, from a man with no power, has you in a snit as you gloss over what an actual President chose to sign into LAW today while no one was watching, a law with far greater immediate arms race risks
-
I know exactly what he signed into law. It's right on the front page of Yahoo. Where do you even get this shit that "no one was watching".doogie said:but Twitter, from a man with no power, has you in a snit as you gloss over what an actual President chose to sign into LAW today while no one was watching, a law with far greater immediate arms race risks
And yes Trump says it as president elect, it can move markets or invoke a response from Russia or China. You have to be a special kind of stupid to think Trump has no power. -
Not when Odoofis let the Russians steam roll him and are building lots of nukes with uranium Hillary got them the mining rights to (Uranium One) here in our country after they donated large sums to the Clinton foundation. Allowing Iran to have nukes etc.2001400ex said:
If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?doogie said:Most people are looking ahead toward the future while snowflakes seem to be having a hard time functioning trying to process defeat.
Troomps will stand by Trump no matter what. Nice work.
You say Trump supporters will by no matter what? Ironic. -
Oh yes you are!dhdawg said:
I don't like it. because unlike you I'm not married to a political god and agree with everything he says and does.doogie said:
We know how you feel about tweets you don't understand but the real question is: How do you feel about the actual LEGISLATION OBAMA SIGNED TODAY that escellates the arms race in space and missile defense programs?dhdawg said:
the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.UWhuskytskeet said:
The US and Russia have 7,000 warheads. The next closest has 300.Purple_Pills said:
No. It's sadly neccessary in this global environment. Finally some sanity and global understanding from our leadership. Wouldn't need a nuke build up if it weren't for Obama's extreme ineptitude and global ignorance the last 8 years.2001400ex said:
If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?
and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?
#fakeoutrage
your republican butt buddies in congress loved it too -
You sound like a huge pussy
-
That brought me Christmas cheer.RaceBannon said:
You should probably build a bomb shelter2001400ex said:
If you read the article, that is the future. Trump is talking a revival of the nuclear weapons program. That doesn't bother you at all?doogie said:Most people are looking ahead toward the future while snowflakes seem to be having a hard time functioning trying to process defeat.
Troomps will stand by Trump no matter what. Nice work.
And then kill yourself -
Your ignorance is unastonishing. The whole point of modernizing our nuclear capabilities is to be strong enough never to have to use said capabilities.2001400ex said:
We have enough nukes to destroy the entire world. Literally. Why do we need more? And why do we need to threaten the use of them? Threatening the use of nukes is the opposite of "sanity and global understanding from our leadership". If you haven't been paying attention, our enemy isn't a state, it's rogue idiots with which a nuke won't help.
Your stupidity is astonishing.
If you haven't been paying attention, Russia has invaded its neighbors, China is flexing its muscles with war games, star wars, and construction of artificial islands in the middle of the South China Sea to further project power, then you have rogue states like the Norks and Iran (who also have been actively invading others in its region) and their nuclear ambition. Obama's foreign policy was inept at best and has led to us to this point where we have to greatly build up our military.
-
No such thing as "free healthcare." Just because everyone else has an inferior system doesn't mean we should either. Scraping that fascist unaffordable care act will save billions in the short term, trillions in the long run.dhdawg said:
the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.
and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race?
-
-
We spend more for worse outcomes. I don't think that is superiorPurple_Pills said:
No such thing as "free healthcare." Just because everyone else has an inferior system doesn't mean we should either. Scraping that fascist unaffordable care act will save billions in the short term, trillions in the long run.dhdawg said:
the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.
and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race? -
If we spent more previously why is this costing TRILLIONS?dhdawg said:
We spend more for worse outcomes. I don't think that is superiorPurple_Pills said:
No such thing as "free healthcare." Just because everyone else has an inferior system doesn't mean we should either. Scraping that fascist unaffordable care act will save billions in the short term, trillions in the long run.dhdawg said:
the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.
and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race? -
Because you believe fake news. The deficit is 1/3 now of what it was in Bush's last budget. How can it cost us trillions?Sledog said:
If we spent more previously why is this costing TRILLIONS?dhdawg said:
We spend more for worse outcomes. I don't think that is superiorPurple_Pills said:
No such thing as "free healthcare." Just because everyone else has an inferior system doesn't mean we should either. Scraping that fascist unaffordable care act will save billions in the short term, trillions in the long run.dhdawg said:
the cowards who don't think that is enough are ironically calling other people snowflakes.
and since everyone loves to ask the question about free healthcare, which every other modern nation has, how do you propose we pay for a nuclear arms race? -
Washington Post, CNN ABC NBC and more have all been exposed generating and perpetuating the fake news phenomenon.
This must be what you are referring to.
https://youtu.be/xl8LOkdGlCk