Aubs...you walked right into Kim's trap
Comments
-
To be fair at 4-0 or even 4-1 we were talking about the team. Just with the losing, they have raised their Doog level up 10 notches so it's hard not to talk about them.DerekJohnson said:
I agree that it becomes a bit much at times. But as Dawgman becomes more irrelevant, posts about them here will tail off.sarktastic said:It seems like 90% of the posters on this bored pay money to read what kim and the posters have to say on dawgman yet post their comments here.
Sort of like this is the Dawgman JV bored -
Many people here are banned at Dawgman, and read via free 30 day trial memberships
-
I would like to see the group move on at some point.DerekJohnson said:
I agree that it becomes a bit much at times. But as Dawgman becomes more irrelevant, posts about them here will tail off.sarktastic said:It seems like 90% of the posters on this bored pay money to read what kim and the posters have to say on dawgman yet post their comments here.
Sort of like this is the Dawgman JV bored
-
sarktastic said: It seems like 90% of the posters on this bored pay money to read what kim and the posters have to say on dawgman yet post their comments here.
Sort of like this is the Dawgman JV bored
Maybe there's a reason why. . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfHJDLoGInM
-
We'll move on when Doogman is irrelevant.WhiskeyDawg said:
I would like to see the group move on at some point.DerekJohnson said:
I agree that it becomes a bit much at times. But as Dawgman becomes more irrelevant, posts about them here will tail off.sarktastic said:It seems like 90% of the posters on this bored pay money to read what kim and the posters have to say on dawgman yet post their comments here.
Sort of like this is the Dawgman JV bored -
yep, we would have got beat!dhdawg said:
that win over Utah they weren't going to win if Wynn didn't get hurtHe_Needs_More_Time said:
He's 7-18 on the road and has only defeated one bowl team on the road.jrjarrell4 said:"Sark has some good road wins"
That was said, in a serious fucking way. -
For those of you fucktards out there who do want to mock Dawgman, this is how you summarize their premium content without poasting their premium content.bananasnblondes said:While I applaud you for providing names to the "well, who do you want to replace him with? Cop out!" group of pussies over there, there is no way you could have provided a name where any of those idiots would say "actually, that's a really good choice." You could have said Nick fucking Saban and Kim's minions would chime in with "he has the best players in the nation playing for him. He hasn't proven he can win without SEC talent."
That thread is however a good chance to look at the idiocy that some of these people spew. My personal favorite was "Mora inherited great talent. UCLA won the Pac-12 south the year before he was hired." -
I hate sark as much as the next guy but having lived in utah and watched utah plenty of times jordan wynn sucks. He became a savior as soon as he was injured as an excuse as to why utah sucked in the pac 12. He had nothing to do with Chris Polk piling up yards on Utah. Also USC was a quality road win whether or not the ncaa allowed them in a bowl.
That being said Sark sucks and I hope he is fired accordingly as soon as he loses to ucla via the plunger. The revisionist history that is annoying on doogman is just as annoying when it is applied to the Sark should be gone argument. Let the facts speak for themselves and keep the hypotheticals for all the losers.






