Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Bama calls out Race Bannon

http://www.secrant.com/rant/display.aspx?sp=67469007&s=2&p=67448091#67469007

"I found this article on "Hardcore Husky" It mentions the history of Bama and UW. I really enjoyed it. It tells the history from the Husky perspective. From what appears to be a very old man(former player, perhaps?) named Race Bannon."
«1

Comments

  • UWerentThereMan
    UWerentThereMan Member Posts: 3,475
  • Crimsonite1
    Crimsonite1 Member Posts: 98
    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
  • PineapplePirate
    PineapplePirate Member Posts: 4,643
    edited December 2016

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    Would agree except QB.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    Read the link attached then get back to me. I do have an appreciation for the rant tho.
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    shit. get with the program. fuck. We aren't doing any running. It's the teenagers and minors that constitute our team doing the running. You are an old fuck with a foot in the grave and bifocals.
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    Ok, I had a few beers, not sure who i was responding to, all of you assholes.
  • Quietcowskee
    Quietcowskee Member Posts: 4,239 Standard Supporter

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    I like our chances against sark and kiff.
  • HuskyHalfBrain
    HuskyHalfBrain Member Posts: 1,311
    BearsWiin said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    shit. get with the program. fuck. We aren't doing any running. It's the teenagers and minors that constitute our team doing the running. You are an old fuck with a foot in the grave and bifocals.
    I'm a middle-aged fuck with two feet in my comfy slippers and progressive lenses, but I still think the UW O shit the bed agin USC because Edgar Bergen left for Fresno two days earlier and left Charlie McCarthy all by his lonesome.

    Race will get it.
    Race was there!
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    edited December 2016
    Extending a win streak to 25 games ain't easy.

    Say what you want about either team.

    The death row defense isn't backing down from no one.

    Coleman and Gaskin will run possessed.

    I expect Washington to win this game as dothe players and coaches.

    It's why you play game.

    Washington can let it rip. The pressure is on bama.

  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    Agree.

    Washington wins. Fuck walking around thinking these kids are getting run over.
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    phineas said:

    Agree.

    Washington wins. Fuck walking around thinking these kids are getting run over.

    I could not agree more.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    every position but QB. Forcing Hurts into turnovers is a necessity
  • Crimsonite1
    Crimsonite1 Member Posts: 98

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    I like our chances against sark and kiff.
    LMAO! Damn, that's what the last 25 opponets said too.
  • Crimsonite1
    Crimsonite1 Member Posts: 98
    dhdawg said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    every position but QB. Forcing Hurts into turnovers is a necessity
    Com'on get real. Hurts is rated ahead of USC's QB in every category, what's his name, Darnell or something like that. Plus Hurts can run as good as anybody's best RB. Hurts was talked about as a Heisman candidate, not USC's QB. USC's QB lost his first start against Utah. Hurts won his first start against USC 52-6. Yes please force him into a turnover, and if you can, lay a dirty hit on him. Both of those things settle him down and turn him into Superman LMAO!
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    I like our chances against sark and kiff.
    LMAO! Damn, that's what the last 25 opponets said too.
    You should stay awhile. Ignore any solicitations by a guy named @iDawg , you already have this shit figured out.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    dhdawg said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    every position but QB. Forcing Hurts into turnovers is a necessity
    Com'on get real. Hurts is rated ahead of USC's QB in every category, what's his name, Darnell or something like that. Plus Hurts can run as good as anybody's best RB. Hurts was talked about as a Heisman candidate, not USC's QB. USC's QB lost his first start against Utah. Hurts won his first start against USC 52-6. Yes please force him into a turnover, and if you can, lay a dirty hit on him. Both of those things settle him down and turn him into Superman LMAO!
    he lost to utah because his defense stunk.
    I've watched both, saying Hurts is better than darnold is some homer shit.
  • Crimsonite1
    Crimsonite1 Member Posts: 98
    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    every position but QB. Forcing Hurts into turnovers is a necessity
    Com'on get real. Hurts is rated ahead of USC's QB in every category, what's his name, Darnell or something like that. Plus Hurts can run as good as anybody's best RB. Hurts was talked about as a Heisman candidate, not USC's QB. USC's QB lost his first start against Utah. Hurts won his first start against USC 52-6. Yes please force him into a turnover, and if you can, lay a dirty hit on him. Both of those things settle him down and turn him into Superman LMAO!
    he lost to utah because his defense stunk.
    I've watched both, saying Hurts is better than darnold is some homer shit.
    Thinking Darnold is even mentionable in the same sentence as Hurts is pure homer shit. 99.99% of the country says your batshit crazy
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937

    dhdawg said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    every position but QB. Forcing Hurts into turnovers is a necessity
    Com'on get real. Hurts is rated ahead of USC's QB in every category, what's his name, Darnell or something like that. Plus Hurts can run as good as anybody's best RB. Hurts was talked about as a Heisman candidate, not USC's QB. USC's QB lost his first start against Utah. Hurts won his first start against USC 52-6. Yes please force him into a turnover, and if you can, lay a dirty hit on him. Both of those things settle him down and turn him into Superman LMAO!
    Hurts is basically Derek Henry at QB pop off!
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    every position but QB. Forcing Hurts into turnovers is a necessity
    Com'on get real. Hurts is rated ahead of USC's QB in every category, what's his name, Darnell or something like that. Plus Hurts can run as good as anybody's best RB. Hurts was talked about as a Heisman candidate, not USC's QB. USC's QB lost his first start against Utah. Hurts won his first start against USC 52-6. Yes please force him into a turnover, and if you can, lay a dirty hit on him. Both of those things settle him down and turn him into Superman LMAO!
    he lost to utah because his defense stunk.
    I've watched both, saying Hurts is better than darnold is some homer shit.
    Thinking Darnold is even mentionable in the same sentence as Hurts is pure homer shit. 99.99% of the country says your batshit crazy
    just out of curiosity, have you actually seen him play?
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    edited December 2016
    dhdawg said:


    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    every position but QB. Forcing Hurts into turnovers is a necessity
    Com'on get real. Hurts is rated ahead of USC's QB in every category, what's his name, Darnell or something like that. Plus Hurts can run as good as anybody's best RB. Hurts was talked about as a Heisman candidate, not USC's QB. USC's QB lost his first start against Utah. Hurts won his first start against USC 52-6. Yes please force him into a turnover, and if you can, lay a dirty hit on him. Both of those things settle him down and turn him into Superman LMAO!
    he lost to utah because his defense stunk.
    I've watched both, saying Hurts is better than darnold is some homer shit.
    Thinking Darnold is even mentionable in the same sentence as Hurts is pure homer shit. 99.99% of the country says your batshit crazy
    just out of curiosity, have you actually seen him play?
    No, because Larry ScottFS has all of our games at 1 am ET
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    dhdawg said:


    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    every position but QB. Forcing Hurts into turnovers is a necessity
    Com'on get real. Hurts is rated ahead of USC's QB in every category, what's his name, Darnell or something like that. Plus Hurts can run as good as anybody's best RB. Hurts was talked about as a Heisman candidate, not USC's QB. USC's QB lost his first start against Utah. Hurts won his first start against USC 52-6. Yes please force him into a turnover, and if you can, lay a dirty hit on him. Both of those things settle him down and turn him into Superman LMAO!
    he lost to utah because his defense stunk.
    I've watched both, saying Hurts is better than darnold is some homer shit.
    Thinking Darnold is even mentionable in the same sentence as Hurts is pure homer shit. 99.99% of the country says your batshit crazy
    just out of curiosity, have you actually seen him play?
    Yes lol he can't throw... His mechanics are way off and i always think of him as Derrick Henry playing QB.
    not talking to you
  • Crimsonite1
    Crimsonite1 Member Posts: 98
    dhdawg said:


    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yeah, it is a good site. They are cooler and funnier than I thought they would be. Pretty realistic most of them are. They are saying how they must create turnovers and they already know they aren't going to be able to run much. Seems like a very football educated fanbase. I guess I expected them to be like USC fans but they are not.

    Don't know what idiot Bama poster said we won't be able to run much. We have some really stupid ones who think they have to be condescending to our opponents. Bama averages nearly 250ypg rushing and we got approxamately that total against defenses rated better overall and better against the run than Washington's. Whatever USC did agaiinst you, just remember Bama is better at every position than USC.
    every position but QB. Forcing Hurts into turnovers is a necessity
    Com'on get real. Hurts is rated ahead of USC's QB in every category, what's his name, Darnell or something like that. Plus Hurts can run as good as anybody's best RB. Hurts was talked about as a Heisman candidate, not USC's QB. USC's QB lost his first start against Utah. Hurts won his first start against USC 52-6. Yes please force him into a turnover, and if you can, lay a dirty hit on him. Both of those things settle him down and turn him into Superman LMAO!
    he lost to utah because his defense stunk.
    I've watched both, saying Hurts is better than darnold is some homer shit.
    Thinking Darnold is even mentionable in the same sentence as Hurts is pure homer shit. 99.99% of the country says your batshit crazy
    just out of curiosity, have you actually seen him play?
    Yep. Watched him kick ya'lls ass. In fact I watch USC every week at Buffalo Wild Wings. Darnold does pretty good playing in the Pac12 where he has all day to throw. And he's very lucky that he didn't get the Start against Bama and have the opportunity to get pounded into the ground and destroy his confidence like the other poor USC QB who had beat him out.
  • Crimsonite1
    Crimsonite1 Member Posts: 98

    Darnold is a first round pick, Jalen Hurts will end up on someone's practice squad as a running back.

    Jalen Hurts will win the Heisman next year while leading Bama to the first 3peat in college football history. He is an excellent passer. He's just a kid. A true freshman given the responsibility of leading the #1 team to the playoffs. QB at Alabama is the most pressurized position in all of college sports and Jalen is Sabans first freshman QB. It has caused him to try too hard throwing instead of being natural. He gets better every week. Meanwhile Darnold plays loose because lets face it, since the first game of the year USC wasn't going anywhere.