Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.
Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.
Most of the better quant rating systems agree with you.
Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.
Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.
Ahem.
North Division Teams Conf Overall 1 Washington 8-1 11-1 2 Washington State 7-2 8-4 3 Stanford 6-3 9-3 4 California 3-6 5-7 5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8 6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.
You just made my point for me.
Not all teams with the same records are created equally, bw's point aside.
Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.
Ahem.
North Division Teams Conf Overall 1 Washington 8-1 11-1 2 Washington State 7-2 8-4 3 Stanford 6-3 9-3 4 California 3-6 5-7 5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8 6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.
Ahem.
North Division Teams Conf Overall 1 Washington 8-1 11-1 2 Washington State 7-2 8-4 3 Stanford 6-3 9-3 4 California 3-6 5-7 5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8 6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Oregon State beat Cal.
Case closed.
Cal beat Utah, Utah beat USC, USC beat Washington. Oregon State won the Pac-12 North!!!!!
I'm calling an Oregon State 2nd place finish in the North next year. I like what they are doing. I see a small scale version of what UW did happening there.
I'm calling an Oregon State 2nd place finish in the North next year. I like what they are doing. I see a small scale version of what UW did happening there.
I'm calling an Oregon State 2nd place finish in the North next year. I like what they are doing. I see a small scale version of what UW did happening there.
They need a qb in the worst way. Anderson is good with defense though.
I'm calling an Oregon State 2nd place finish in the North next year. I like what they are doing. I see a small scale version of what UW did happening there.
They need a qb in the worst way. Anderson is good with defense though.
The guy at the end of the year looked okay. They will play tough with the white RB and in the finesse PAC 12, toughness goes a long way. They are trending up imo. Year one was a disaster. They were better this year and next year is their hopeful breakout year.
Cal sucks, WSU will be bad without Falk. Oregon is a little bit of a wild card. Stanford should be solid, but they don't have a good QB and lose McCaffrey.
Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.
Ahem.
North Division Teams Conf Overall 1 Washington 8-1 11-1 2 Washington State 7-2 8-4 3 Stanford 6-3 9-3 4 California 3-6 5-7 5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8 6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Oregon State beat Cal.
Case closed.
Perhaps you can write a strongly worded letter to pac-12.org to have them list OS(U) above Cal in their standings, then.
Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.
Ahem.
North Division Teams Conf Overall 1 Washington 8-1 11-1 2 Washington State 7-2 8-4 3 Stanford 6-3 9-3 4 California 3-6 5-7 5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8 6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Oregon State beat Cal.
Case closed.
Perhaps you can write a strongly worded letter to pac-12.org to have them list OS(U) above Cal in their standings, then.
My guess is they used overall record to sort tied teams.
Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.
Ahem.
North Division Teams Conf Overall 1 Washington 8-1 11-1 2 Washington State 7-2 8-4 3 Stanford 6-3 9-3 4 California 3-6 5-7 5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8 6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Oregon State beat Cal.
Case closed.
Perhaps you can write a strongly worded letter to pac-12.org to have them list OS(U) above Cal in their standings, then.
My guess is they used overall record to sort tied teams.
Irregardless, your poont is mute.
Head-to-head determines champions, not rankings further down. Overall record determines lower rankings. You said OS(U) was forf in the norf. My poont was that the conference considers Cal to be forf in the norf.
Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.
Ahem.
North Division Teams Conf Overall 1 Washington 8-1 11-1 2 Washington State 7-2 8-4 3 Stanford 6-3 9-3 4 California 3-6 5-7 5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8 6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Oregon State beat Cal.
Case closed.
Perhaps you can write a strongly worded letter to pac-12.org to have them list OS(U) above Cal in their standings, then.
My guess is they used overall record to sort tied teams.
Irregardless, your poont is mute.
Head-to-head determines champions, not rankings further down. Overall record determines lower rankings. You said OS(U) was forf in the norf. My poont was that the conference considers Cal to be forf in the norf.
Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.
Ahem.
North Division Teams Conf Overall 1 Washington 8-1 11-1 2 Washington State 7-2 8-4 3 Stanford 6-3 9-3 4 California 3-6 5-7 5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8 6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Oregon State beat Cal.
Case closed.
Perhaps you can write a strongly worded letter to pac-12.org to have them list OS(U) above Cal in their standings, then.
My guess is they used overall record to sort tied teams.
Irregardless, your poont is mute.
Head-to-head determines champions, not rankings further down. Overall record determines lower rankings. You said OS(U) was forf in the norf. My poont was that the conference considers Cal to be forf in the norf.
Comments
Oh and he's also a faggot,
You just made my point for me.
North Division
Teams Conf Overall
1 Washington 8-1 11-1
2 Washington State 7-2 8-4
3 Stanford 6-3 9-3
4 California 3-6 5-7
5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8
6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Case closed.
Cal sucks, WSU will be bad without Falk. Oregon is a little bit of a wild card. Stanford should be solid, but they don't have a good QB and lose McCaffrey.
Irregardless, your poont is mute.
Nobody knows.