Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
UW's SOS is strong
Comments
-
I'm calling an Oregon State 2nd place finish in the North next year. I like what they are doing. I see a small scale version of what UW did happening there.
-
I like their DBs a lot they are good.RoadDawg55 said:I'm calling an Oregon State 2nd place finish in the North next year. I like what they are doing. I see a small scale version of what UW did happening there.
-
They need a qb in the worst way. Anderson is good with defense though.RoadDawg55 said:I'm calling an Oregon State 2nd place finish in the North next year. I like what they are doing. I see a small scale version of what UW did happening there.
-
The guy at the end of the year looked okay. They will play tough with the white RB and in the finesse PAC 12, toughness goes a long way. They are trending up imo. Year one was a disaster. They were better this year and next year is their hopeful breakout year.AtomicDawg said:
They need a qb in the worst way. Anderson is good with defense though.RoadDawg55 said:I'm calling an Oregon State 2nd place finish in the North next year. I like what they are doing. I see a small scale version of what UW did happening there.
Cal sucks, WSU will be bad without Falk. Oregon is a little bit of a wild card. Stanford should be solid, but they don't have a good QB and lose McCaffrey. -
Perhaps you can write a strongly worded letter to pac-12.org to have them list OS(U) above Cal in their standings, then.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon State beat Cal.BearsWiin said:
Ahem.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.Mad_Son said:
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Mad_Son said:
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
North Division
Teams Conf Overall
1 Washington 8-1 11-1
2 Washington State 7-2 8-4
3 Stanford 6-3 9-3
4 California 3-6 5-7
5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8
6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Case closed. -
My guess is they used overall record to sort tied teams.BearsWiin said:
Perhaps you can write a strongly worded letter to pac-12.org to have them list OS(U) above Cal in their standings, then.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon State beat Cal.BearsWiin said:
Ahem.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.Mad_Son said:
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Mad_Son said:
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
North Division
Teams Conf Overall
1 Washington 8-1 11-1
2 Washington State 7-2 8-4
3 Stanford 6-3 9-3
4 California 3-6 5-7
5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8
6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Case closed.
Irregardless, your poont is mute. -
Fuck you. I miss Chesty. And being a faggot is the best!!!JaWarrenJaHooker said:Chest thought this bored would be dead by now.
Oh and he's also a faggot,
oh yeah! -
Head-to-head determines champions, not rankings further down. Overall record determines lower rankings. You said OS(U) was forf in the norf. My poont was that the conference considers Cal to be forf in the norf.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
My guess is they used overall record to sort tied teams.BearsWiin said:
Perhaps you can write a strongly worded letter to pac-12.org to have them list OS(U) above Cal in their standings, then.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon State beat Cal.BearsWiin said:
Ahem.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.Mad_Son said:
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Mad_Son said:
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
North Division
Teams Conf Overall
1 Washington 8-1 11-1
2 Washington State 7-2 8-4
3 Stanford 6-3 9-3
4 California 3-6 5-7
5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8
6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Case closed.
Irregardless, your poont is mute. -
It could be alphabetical order too.BearsWiin said:
Head-to-head determines champions, not rankings further down. Overall record determines lower rankings. You said OS(U) was forf in the norf. My poont was that the conference considers Cal to be forf in the norf.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
My guess is they used overall record to sort tied teams.BearsWiin said:
Perhaps you can write a strongly worded letter to pac-12.org to have them list OS(U) above Cal in their standings, then.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon State beat Cal.BearsWiin said:
Ahem.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.Mad_Son said:
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Mad_Son said:
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
North Division
Teams Conf Overall
1 Washington 8-1 11-1
2 Washington State 7-2 8-4
3 Stanford 6-3 9-3
4 California 3-6 5-7
5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8
6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Case closed.
Irregardless, your poont is mute.
Nobody knows. -
Now, more than ever, CAL BEAT TEXASTierbsHsotBoobs said:
It could be alphabetical order too.BearsWiin said:
Head-to-head determines champions, not rankings further down. Overall record determines lower rankings. You said OS(U) was forf in the norf. My poont was that the conference considers Cal to be forf in the norf.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
My guess is they used overall record to sort tied teams.BearsWiin said:
Perhaps you can write a strongly worded letter to pac-12.org to have them list OS(U) above Cal in their standings, then.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon State beat Cal.BearsWiin said:
Ahem.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon State finished forf in the Norf.Mad_Son said:
That is definitely not true. I've watched more shitty big ten football than I should have since I went to Wisconsin and my wife went to Maryland... those teams are Oregon State level bad. Having three very good teams and three terrible teams doesn't make you better than having a real spread of quality. Washingon, WSU, Stanford are not be as good as Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State but the lower half of the division makes up for it when you get to the bottom half of the Big Ten East.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Mad_Son said:
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan state, and Rutgers say hi.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sagarin is a joke. No fucking way is the P12 North better than the B1G East.
Except for Rutgers, they're better than the bottom three of the P12 North.
Your silence about the top half speaks volumes.
North Division
Teams Conf Overall
1 Washington 8-1 11-1
2 Washington State 7-2 8-4
3 Stanford 6-3 9-3
4 California 3-6 5-7
5 Oregon State 3-6 4-8
6 Oregon 2-7 4-8
Case closed.
Irregardless, your poont is mute.
Nobody knows.
