Kim Grinolds Fucking Stupid - Pat Hill TUFF is Just Like Tim DeRuyter
Comments
-
Kim asked "who would you replace him with?" knowing that there was no correct answer. Whoever the guy said, Kim would make some stupid comment about how that coach wouldn't be good. If he would have said Mora, Kim would have said "A guy who just got destroyed by Stanford, no thanks. That would be a step back. Sark beat Stanford."
-
Kim knows with Sark he'll always have access. He is willing to cover a shitty football team if he can have access.
He's afraid of the Mora hire because he knows all of us have all the screenshots that we need so we'll provide Mora with them. Have fun getting access after all the shit that has been said. -
DeRuyter is no different than Pat Hill. Mora is a loose cannon who could implode at any time. Plus, he has burned bridges during recruiting. Craig Bohl has never coached a BCS team. Pete Lembo inherited a great situation at Ball State. How are any of these guys different from Sark?
-
But how was Mark Emmert a bad president?RoadDawg55 said:DeRuyter is no different than Pat Hill. Mora is a loose cannon who could implode at any time. Plus, he has burned bridges during recruiting. Craig Bohl has never coached a BCS team. Pete Lembo inherited a great situation at Ball State. How are any of these guys different from Sark?
-
Meh. DeRuyter wins a lot of 45-42 type games for a defensive coach.
-
So did Pete Carroll.DeLarry said:Meh. DeRuyter wins a lot of 45-42 type games for a defensive coach.
-
To be fair Mora did that last year and I would take Mora in a heartbeat.DeLarry said:Meh. DeRuyter wins a lot of 45-42 type games for a defensive coach.
-
They win more?RoadDawg55 said:DeRuyter is no different than Pat Hill. Mora is a loose cannon who could implode at any time. Plus, he has burned bridges during recruiting. Craig Bohl has never coached a BCS team. Pete Lembo inherited a great situation at Ball State. How are any of these guys different from Sark?
-
So did Mike Stoops. I could do this all night.
I'm betting that I can come up with a longer list of failures who get into 45-42 games than you can successes. Using the exception to suggest that the rule doesn't matter is something like the people who think it's ok that we fill our roster with second and third choice recroots because Mason Foster was a 2 star.
-
If he was losing 45-42 I'd agree but he's WINNING so I'll go with him. He also turned around four different programs as a DC. He's a good coach and will be successful.DeLarry said:So did Mike Stoops. I could do this all night.
I'm betting that I can come up with a longer list of failures who get into 45-42 games than you can successes. Using the exception to suggest that the rule doesn't matter is something like the people who think it's ok that we fill our roster with second and third choice recroots because Mason Foster was a 2 star.




