Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I really want to be excited

2

Comments

  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,365

    HuskyJW said:

    I'm 41.... this is either the second or third most successful season of my entire life.

    1990, 1991, and 2000 were all better (so far).

    Win the conference next week then pop off.
    Your emptiest 11 win season (so far) had more merit. The 1990 season sucked ass. The 1990 UCLA loss which ended all hopes of a Natty was far more devastating than this year's loss to SC.

    Win. Win and Win and you can still pop off.

    After UCLA in 1990 it was win, win and "fuck, we fucking pissed a Natty."
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    pawz said:

    HuskyJW said:

    I'm 41.... this is either the second or third most successful season of my entire life.

    1990, 1991, and 2000 were all better (so far).

    Win the conference next week then pop off.
    Why do you hate 1984?
    Didn't win the conference.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Fuck I hope I don't have to bump this next week.
  • PurpleReignPurpleReign Member Posts: 5,473
    The monkey thread has a good list.
  • CaptainPJCaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986

    Fuck I hope I don't have to bump this next week.

    It doesn't fucking matter. You don't get it.

    I. ENJOY. EVERY. FUCKING. WIN.

    I am able to do so because I didn't go 3,400 light years off the rez and back myself into a mental ward corner going into a five year one-note overboard tizzy trying to basically say "I want to watch good football" in such a hyperbolic fashion that now, when good football is being played, I can't myself enjoy it and actively try to ruin it for others by attempting to convince everyone that my pathological world view is some deep cardinal rule and not just irrelevant bitter ranting of an unfunny eccentric.
    This
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,839
    If you can't be excited i can't help you..
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Fuck I hope I don't have to bump this next week.

    It doesn't fucking matter. You don't get it.

    I. ENJOY. EVERY. FUCKING. WIN.

    I am able to do so because I didn't go 3,400 light years off the rez and back myself into a mental ward corner going into a five year one-note overboard tizzy trying to basically say "I want to watch good football" in such a hyperbolic fashion that now, when good football is being played, I can't myself enjoy it and actively try to ruin it for others by attempting to convince everyone that my pathological world view is some deep cardinal rule and not just irrelevant bitter ranting of an unfunny eccentric.
    I've enjoyed the hell out of this season.

    You need new meds.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    pat_hm said:

    HuskyJW said:

    11-1

    Emptiest 11 win season ever.

    The next three games tell us everything.
    Did you all the sudden forget that Oregon had curb stomped us 12 years in a row prior to this 11-1 season? Empty? That felt fucking incredible. 5-0 in the north and ended another decade plus long losing streak to ASU. This is the most revelent UW has been in nearly two decades. What the fuck more do you want?? Empty. Give me a fucking break. Of course keep winning but to act like this team hasn't accomplished anything is a dogshit take.
    It is great that UW had beaten these retards so soundly.

    Now FINISH the fucking job.
  • whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 4,616 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2016
    Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:

    1991: no losses
    2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
    2016: 1 loss, division title
    1990: 2 losses, conf title
    1980: 2 losses, conf title
    1981: 2 losses, conf title
    1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
    1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker

    The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list.
  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,170
    whlinder said:

    Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:

    1991: no losses
    2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
    2016: 1 loss, division title
    1990: 2 losses, conf title
    1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
    1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker

    The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list.

    The conference is not terrible this year, despite how much that narrative had been pushed.
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729
    Mad_Son said:

    whlinder said:

    Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:

    1991: no losses
    2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
    2016: 1 loss, division title
    1990: 2 losses, conf title
    1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
    1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker

    The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list.

    The conference is not terrible this year, despite how much that narrative had been pushed.
    Under rated consider how Colorado played head to head against Michigan until Sefo got hurt
    WSU shit the bed against Eastern and Boise or they would have been ranked top 10
  • whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 4,616 Standard Supporter
    Yes it's a good conference. What with all those awesome OOC wins we have.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Mad_Son said:

    whlinder said:

    Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:

    1991: no losses
    2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
    2016: 1 loss, division title
    1990: 2 losses, conf title
    1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
    1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker

    The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list.

    The conference is not terrible this year, despite how much that narrative had been pushed.
    Hi. WSU went 7-2 in this shit conference.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Mad_Son said:

    whlinder said:

    Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:

    1991: no losses
    2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
    2016: 1 loss, division title
    1990: 2 losses, conf title
    1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
    1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker

    The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list.

    The conference is not terrible this year, despite how much that narrative had been pushed.
    Under rated consider how Colorado played head to head against Michigan until Sefo got hurt
    WSU shit the bed against Eastern and Boise or they would have been ranked top 10
    So with a lot of Sark level hypothetical bullshit the conference is good.

    Got it.
  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,170
    edited November 2016

    Mad_Son said:

    whlinder said:

    Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:

    1991: no losses
    2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
    2016: 1 loss, division title
    1990: 2 losses, conf title
    1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
    1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker

    The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list.

    The conference is not terrible this year, despite how much that narrative had been pushed.
    Under rated consider how Colorado played head to head against Michigan until Sefo got hurt
    WSU shit the bed against Eastern and Boise or they would have been ranked top 10
    So with a lot of Sark level hypothetical bullshit the conference is good.

    Got it.
    Because your comprehension of college football is a binary recognition of win and loss. Your previous arguments have identified usc as better than uw, uw as better than utah, and Utah as better than usc. Great analysis as always.
  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,170
    Mad_Son said:

    Mad_Son said:

    whlinder said:

    Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:

    1991: no losses
    2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
    2016: 1 loss, division title
    1990: 2 losses, conf title
    1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
    1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker

    The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list.

    The conference is not terrible this year, despite how much that narrative had been pushed.
    Under rated consider how Colorado played head to head against Michigan until Sefo got hurt
    WSU shit the bed against Eastern and Boise or they would have been ranked top 10
    So with a lot of Sark level hypothetical bullshit the conference is good.

    Got it.
    Because your comprehension of college football is a binary recognition of win and loss. Your previous arguments have identified usc as better than uw, uw as better than utah, and Utah as better than usc. Great analysis as always.
    And the point is not about hypotheticals, but about a full season of results. There are a lot of games that have shown us a lot to compare teams.

    Michigan beating Colorado, atm beating ucla, and alabama beating usc is a feeble argument to say the pac 12 sucks.
Sign In or Register to comment.