I really want to be excited
Comments
-
I've enjoyed the hell out of this season.Dennis_DeYoung said:
It doesn't fucking matter. You don't get it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Fuck I hope I don't have to bump this next week.
I. ENJOY. EVERY. FUCKING. WIN.
I am able to do so because I didn't go 3,400 light years off the rez and back myself into a mental ward corner going into a five year one-note overboard tizzy trying to basically say "I want to watch good football" in such a hyperbolic fashion that now, when good football is being played, I can't myself enjoy it and actively try to ruin it for others by attempting to convince everyone that my pathological world view is some deep cardinal rule and not just irrelevant bitter ranting of an unfunny eccentric.
You need new meds. -
It is great that UW had beaten these retards so soundly.pat_hm said:
Did you all the sudden forget that Oregon had curb stomped us 12 years in a row prior to this 11-1 season? Empty? That felt fucking incredible. 5-0 in the north and ended another decade plus long losing streak to ASU. This is the most revelent UW has been in nearly two decades. What the fuck more do you want?? Empty. Give me a fucking break. Of course keep winning but to act like this team hasn't accomplished anything is a dogshit take.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Now FINISH the fucking job. -
Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:
1991: no losses
2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
2016: 1 loss, division title
1990: 2 losses, conf title
1980: 2 losses, conf title
1981: 2 losses, conf title
1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker
The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list. -
The conference is not terrible this year, despite how much that narrative had been pushed.whlinder said:Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:
1991: no losses
2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
2016: 1 loss, division title
1990: 2 losses, conf title
1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker
The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list. -
Under rated consider how Colorado played head to head against Michigan until Sefo got hurtMad_Son said:
The conference is not terrible this year, despite how much that narrative had been pushed.whlinder said:Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:
1991: no losses
2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
2016: 1 loss, division title
1990: 2 losses, conf title
1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker
The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list.
WSU shit the bed against Eastern and Boise or they would have been ranked top 10 -
Yes it's a good conference. What with all those awesome OOC wins we have.
-
Hi. WSU went 7-2 in this shit conference.Mad_Son said:
The conference is not terrible this year, despite how much that narrative had been pushed.whlinder said:Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:
1991: no losses
2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
2016: 1 loss, division title
1990: 2 losses, conf title
1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker
The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list. -
So with a lot of Sark level hypothetical bullshit the conference is good.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
Under rated consider how Colorado played head to head against Michigan until Sefo got hurtMad_Son said:
The conference is not terrible this year, despite how much that narrative had been pushed.whlinder said:Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:
1991: no losses
2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
2016: 1 loss, division title
1990: 2 losses, conf title
1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker
The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list.
WSU shit the bed against Eastern and Boise or they would have been ranked top 10
Got it. -
Because your comprehension of college football is a binary recognition of win and loss. Your previous arguments have identified usc as better than uw, uw as better than utah, and Utah as better than usc. Great analysis as always.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
So with a lot of Sark level hypothetical bullshit the conference is good.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
Under rated consider how Colorado played head to head against Michigan until Sefo got hurtMad_Son said:
The conference is not terrible this year, despite how much that narrative had been pushed.whlinder said:Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:
1991: no losses
2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
2016: 1 loss, division title
1990: 2 losses, conf title
1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker
The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list.
WSU shit the bed against Eastern and Boise or they would have been ranked top 10
Got it. -
And the point is not about hypotheticals, but about a full season of results. There are a lot of games that have shown us a lot to compare teams.Mad_Son said:
Because your comprehension of college football is a binary recognition of win and loss. Your previous arguments have identified usc as better than uw, uw as better than utah, and Utah as better than usc. Great analysis as always.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
So with a lot of Sark level hypothetical bullshit the conference is good.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
Under rated consider how Colorado played head to head against Michigan until Sefo got hurtMad_Son said:
The conference is not terrible this year, despite how much that narrative had been pushed.whlinder said:Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:
1991: no losses
2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
2016: 1 loss, division title
1990: 2 losses, conf title
1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker
The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list.
WSU shit the bed against Eastern and Boise or they would have been ranked top 10
Got it.
Michigan beating Colorado, atm beating ucla, and alabama beating usc is a feeble argument to say the pac 12 sucks. -
Win on Friday and this is the number 3 season in the last 30 years for me, even if we lose our first CFP game. PAC 12 Champs popping off. Lose and yeah, drops to like 7th or 8th in the last 30 years. Now win on Friday and then win our first CFP playoff game and you have eclipsed the 2000 season and are just shy of 1991 legendary status. This is fucking fun. The funny thing is all you need is ten wins a year and you are in conversation and you have a chance. Pete just needs to keep this rolling...win 10+ every year and one year you will break through and grab a Rose Bowl or actually snag a win or two in the CFP. Basically what Oregon did for 5 years. Be in the conversation and you have a chance, vice 7-6 incremental progress bullshit.whlinder said:Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:
1991: no losses
2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
2016: 1 loss, division title
1990: 2 losses, conf title
1980: 2 losses, conf title
1981: 2 losses, conf title
1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker
The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list. -
-
Here is the thing about this list, for me at least...whlinder said:Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:
1991: no losses
2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
2016: 1 loss, division title
1990: 2 losses, conf title
1980: 2 losses, conf title
1981: 2 losses, conf title
1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker
The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list.
If this had been every other season on you list, save for 1991, we? would be conference champs going to the Rose Bowel. So I guess it's kind of apples and oranges to compare it in my opinion.
Is boobs/pumpy, but with not the same med mix as pumpy/steelheader? -
It's a valid poont that the measure of success has changed.JECAR said:
Here is the thing about this list, for me at least...whlinder said:Comparing where we are in the season (regular season complete) against history in my lifetime:
1991: no losses
2000: 1 loss, ridiculous non-con win, conf title due to tiebreaker
2016: 1 loss, division title
1990: 2 losses, conf title
1980: 2 losses, conf title
1981: 2 losses, conf title
1992: 2 losses, conf title due to tiebreaker
1984: 1 loss, lose conf title tiebreaker
The conference might be retarded this year but a win on Friday moves it above 2000. A loss moves it to the bottom of this list.
If this had been every other season on you list, save for 1991, we? would be conference champs going to the Rose Bowel. So I guess it's kind of apples and oranges to compare it in my opinion.
Is boobs/pumpy, but with not the same med mix as pumpy/steelheader?
-
Please do not give BoobsFS free therapy. This is a football board.Dennis_DeYoung said:
It doesn't fucking matter. You don't get it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Fuck I hope I don't have to bump this next week.
I. ENJOY. EVERY. FUCKING. WIN.
I am able to do so because I didn't go 3,400 light years off the rez and back myself into a mental ward corner going into a five year one-note overboard tizzy trying to basically say "I want to watch good football" in such a hyperbolic fashion that now, when good football is being played, I can't myself enjoy it and actively try to ruin it for others by attempting to convince everyone that my pathological world view is some deep cardinal rule and not just irrelevant bitter ranting of an unfunny eccentric. -
Just another example of how difficult it is to go undefeatedseatownfunk said:
USC won the conference that year.pawz said:
Why do you hate 1984?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
1990, 1991, and 2000 were all better (so far).HuskyJW said:I'm 41.... this is either the second or third most successful season of my entire life.
Win the conference next week then pop off.
