Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Why ND shouldn't have to vacate wins

UWerentThereMan
Member Posts: 3,475
Because they have none of any significance in x years
Edit:in last x years where x is less than 25years
Edit:in last x years where x is less than 25years
Tagged:
Comments
-
I hope Javon McKinley burns in hell.
-
Vacating wins is stupid in general. The games happened, no team ND lost to cares about their charity win.
The only one who should care is Brian Kelly for his legacy and maybe he won't get some bonuses from the vacated wins. -
If it isn't performance enhancing then vacating wins is idiotic.
Reggie Bush's parents getting a nicer house didn't make Reggie a better running back.
Kids that aren't smart enough or are too lazy to do class work don't become better if you do their homework for them. -
I hate ND but this seems dumb. It's relatively minor. Emmert has no fucking clue.
-
Vacating wins doesn't result in a transfer (of the win) to the other team. It stays an L.RoadDawg55 said:Vacating wins is stupid in general. The games happened, no team ND lost to cares about their charity win.
The only one who should care is Brian Kelly for his legacy and maybe he won't get some bonuses from the vacated wins.
**And, yes, I remember DJ's first RB season.
-
This is a hilariously draconian penalty and will serve only to deter others from self reporting in the future.
-
Gladstone said:
This is a hilariously draconian penalty and will serve only to deter others from self reporting in the future.
It only penalizes the coach. ie Bobby Bowden. And his overall W-L record.
-
This is huge! The '09 Dawgs just became bowl eligible! Fourteen extra practices! Shart for Sark!
-
What'd he doDennis_DeYoung said:I hope Javon McKinley burns in hell.