Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

HondaFS (and the Elite Left) 's Delussion

135

Comments

  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Sledog said:

    It is hidden. If you are unemployed and don't find a job within an allotted time frame you are removed from the unemployed total. You cease to exist. They've removed millions and the actual number is higher. Cook the books to look better. <

    If it's hidden, how do you know what the total is?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    ThomasFremont said:

    Sledog said:

    It is hidden. If you are unemployed and don't find a job within an allotted time frame you are removed from the unemployed total. You cease to exist. They've removed millions and the actual number is higher. Cook the books to look better. <

    If it's hidden, how do you know what the total is?
    Exactly. Welcome to Oct '12
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    pawz said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    Sledog said:

    It is hidden. If you are unemployed and don't find a job within an allotted time frame you are removed from the unemployed total. You cease to exist. They've removed millions and the actual number is higher. Cook the books to look better. <

    If it's hidden, how do you know what the total is?
    Exactly. Welcome to Oct '12
    I'm not saying it's one way or the other, but if your logic is that it's "hidden" it could just as easily be exactly what they say, or better.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,927 Standard Supporter
    ThomasFremont said:

    pawz said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    Sledog said:

    It is hidden. If you are unemployed and don't find a job within an allotted time frame you are removed from the unemployed total. You cease to exist. They've removed millions and the actual number is higher. Cook the books to look better. <

    If it's hidden, how do you know what the total is?
    Exactly. Welcome to Oct '12
    I'm not saying it's one way or the other, but if your logic is that it's "hidden" it could just as easily be exactly what they say, or better.
    Well it isn't hidden in that they say they removed them from the roles of the unemployed but they no longer count in the current unemployment numbers. So if you don't total those removed when it occurs and do it over time you won't know how many have been removed. They don't say "unemployment is X% minus X number removed from the unemployment statistics because they couldn't find a job within X months"

    So figures never lie but liars figure. It's like elections, democrats will count the votes however many times it takes until they win. Like when ballots were "found" in car car truck and hundreds of felons being allowed to vote to elect AL Franken.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    ThomasFremont said:

    pawz said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    Sledog said:

    It is hidden. If you are unemployed and don't find a job within an allotted time frame you are removed from the unemployed total. You cease to exist. They've removed millions and the actual number is higher. Cook the books to look better. <

    If it's hidden, how do you know what the total is?
    Exactly. Welcome to Oct '12
    I'm not saying it's one way or the other, but if your logic is that it's "hidden" it could just as easily be exactly what they say, or better.
    When the Obama administration released rosey jobs numbers leading into the election, did you think they were what they said, or better?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    pawz said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    Sledog said:

    It is hidden. If you are unemployed and don't find a job within an allotted time frame you are removed from the unemployed total. You cease to exist. They've removed millions and the actual number is higher. Cook the books to look better. <

    If it's hidden, how do you know what the total is?
    Exactly. Welcome to Oct '12
    I'm not saying it's one way or the other, but if your logic is that it's "hidden" it could just as easily be exactly what they say, or better.
    Well it isn't hidden in that they say they removed them from the roles of the unemployed but they no longer count in the current unemployment numbers. So if you don't total those removed when it occurs and do it over time you won't know how many have been removed. They don't say "unemployment is X% minus X number removed from the unemployment statistics because they couldn't find a job within X months"

    So figures never lie but liars figure. It's like elections, democrats will count the votes however many times it takes until they win. Like when ballots were "found" in car car truck and hundreds of felons being allowed to vote to elect AL Franken.
    Weren't you just commented about people being dumb believing news on social media sites?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,927 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    pawz said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    Sledog said:

    It is hidden. If you are unemployed and don't find a job within an allotted time frame you are removed from the unemployed total. You cease to exist. They've removed millions and the actual number is higher. Cook the books to look better. <

    If it's hidden, how do you know what the total is?
    Exactly. Welcome to Oct '12
    I'm not saying it's one way or the other, but if your logic is that it's "hidden" it could just as easily be exactly what they say, or better.
    Well it isn't hidden in that they say they removed them from the roles of the unemployed but they no longer count in the current unemployment numbers. So if you don't total those removed when it occurs and do it over time you won't know how many have been removed. They don't say "unemployment is X% minus X number removed from the unemployment statistics because they couldn't find a job within X months"

    So figures never lie but liars figure. It's like elections, democrats will count the votes however many times it takes until they win. Like when ballots were "found" in car car truck and hundreds of felons being allowed to vote to elect AL Franken.
    Weren't you just commented about people being dumb believing news on social media sites?
    Too bad you didn't look it up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2016
    Hondo voted for HRC. It's obvious. Everyone knows it, no matter how much he pretends he didn't. He's a talking doll for HRC types. Just pull his string and hear him whine. He'll come back and say he didn't vote for HRC. But, even if he actually didn't vote for Hillary, he still did, in the minds of anyone who counts. And that's all that matters.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,927 Standard Supporter
    Here's why Hondo voted HRC

    http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-31/communist-party-leader-voted-for-sanders-will-back-clinton
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    TurdBuffer said:

    Hondo voted for HRC. It's obvious. Everyone knows it, no matter how much he pretends he didn't. He's a talking doll for HRC types. Just pull his string and hear him whine. He'll come back and say he didn't vote for HRC. But, even if he actually didn't vote for Hillary, he still did, in the minds of anyone who counts. And that's all that matters.

    Everyone on this board that lives in Washington, Oregon, or California voted for Hillary.

    HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter