2009 new coaches - how Sark compares

RoadDawg55 said:

MikeDamone said:

Mushcamp wasn't offered. That is from "a source" at Washington. You're right about one thing. You don't have inside connections.

"Legitimately" excited? Ok. Based on a kick ass presser, FREE PUB! "Almost" getting to .500, and losing to LSU in what didnt appear to be a blowout. We heard the same shit for the previous 6 or 7 years. From gliby "tuff qiestions", to Tyrone being te molder of men.

Forgive me for wanting to see results on the field before I jizz myself

Damone, bro.... What is it with you? Beating USC in 2009 was not exciting and enjoyable for you? We want the same thing when it comes to Husky football, but are you not going to get excited about anything until we win a Rose Bowl again?

Of course beating SC was exiting. So was the holiday bowl. It was exciting beating Stanford. Losing to WSU, getting boat raced by LSU and Oregon..taking a dump against Boise state...not real exciting. Separate yourself from individual games and look at overall patterns in games and direction as a whole. That's what we are discussing, not specific outcomes.

It would be like hitting a couple of good shots in golf. Maybe also bouncing a crappy shot of a rock and have it land and inch from the hole for a tap in par. When the round is over and you look at each hole, the picture that is painted is that I suck at golf. But hey, weren't those 3 or 4 holes exciting?