Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hillary's closing argument

2»

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    This election is easy. Neoliberal or fascist, your call.

    Fascist?
    Yes, fascist. Did he stutter?

    Odd never heard Trump talk fascism. Obozo yes in certain ways. Hillary yes. You people are daft.
    Threatening to jail political opponents, scapegoating a religious group, scapegoating immigrants, nativism and nationalist rhetoric.

    This is Kane Hall fascism 101 stuff.
    Odd haven't heard that. Calling criminals criminals isn't fascist either. Illegals are illegal. Get it? Which religious group is scape Goated? Muslims? Do you live in a vacuum? Is the basement that dark? Are you really this easily offended? Tell mom you want meatloaf.
    Criminals are convicted of crimes in a court under the rule of law.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    This election is easy. Neoliberal or fascist, your call.

    Fascist?
    Yes, fascist. Did he stutter?

    Odd never heard Trump talk fascism. Obozo yes in certain ways. Hillary yes. You people are daft.
    Threatening to jail political opponents, scapegoating a religious group, scapegoating immigrants, nativism and nationalist rhetoric.

    This is Kane Hall fascism 101 stuff.
    Odd haven't heard that. Calling criminals criminals isn't fascist either. Illegals are illegal. Get it? Which religious group is scape Goated? Muslims? Do you live in a vacuum? Is the basement that dark? Are you really this easily offended? Tell mom you want meatloaf.
    Criminals are convicted of crimes in a court under the rule of law.
    Not when they are in charge of the system and it's all corrupt. Name another case where the law enforcement agencyou say they did it but don't recommend charges fir lack of intent? Prosecutors make those decisions not law enforcement. That both the President and the AG are actually involved makes it absolutely ridiculous.

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    This election is easy. Neoliberal or fascist, your call.

    Fascist?
    Yes, fascist. Did he stutter?

    Odd never heard Trump talk fascism. Obozo yes in certain ways. Hillary yes. You people are daft.
    Threatening to jail political opponents, scapegoating a religious group, scapegoating immigrants, nativism and nationalist rhetoric.

    This is Kane Hall fascism 101 stuff.
    Odd haven't heard that. Calling criminals criminals isn't fascist either. Illegals are illegal. Get it? Which religious group is scape Goated? Muslims? Do you live in a vacuum? Is the basement that dark? Are you really this easily offended? Tell mom you want meatloaf.
    Criminals are convicted of crimes in a court under the rule of law.
    Not when they are in charge of the system and it's all corrupt. Name another case where the law enforcement agencyou say they did it but don't recommend charges fir lack of intent? Prosecutors make those decisions not law enforcement. That both the President and the AG are actually involved makes it absolutely ridiculous.

    If law enforcement doesn't think they have enough evidence to get a conviction, they have every right to share that opinion with the prosecution.

    It happens all the time.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    This election is easy. Neoliberal or fascist, your call.

    Fascist?
    Yes, fascist. Did he stutter?

    Odd never heard Trump talk fascism. Obozo yes in certain ways. Hillary yes. You people are daft.
    Threatening to jail political opponents, scapegoating a religious group, scapegoating immigrants, nativism and nationalist rhetoric.

    This is Kane Hall fascism 101 stuff.
    Odd haven't heard that. Calling criminals criminals isn't fascist either. Illegals are illegal. Get it? Which religious group is scape Goated? Muslims? Do you live in a vacuum? Is the basement that dark? Are you really this easily offended? Tell mom you want meatloaf.
    Criminals are convicted of crimes in a court under the rule of law.
    Not when they are in charge of the system and it's all corrupt. Name another case where the law enforcement agencyou say they did it but don't recommend charges fir lack of intent? Prosecutors make those decisions not law enforcement. That both the President and the AG are actually involved makes it absolutely ridiculous.

    If law enforcement doesn't think they have enough evidence to get a conviction, they have every right to share that opinion with the prosecution.

    It happens all the time.
    They can share but the prosecutor decides. In this case they have all the evidence but say they lack intent an element of all crimes. This is a prima facie crime. Much like a traffic citation. You either knew or should have known it was illegal.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    This election is easy. Neoliberal or fascist, your call.

    Fascist?
    Yes, fascist. Did he stutter?

    Odd never heard Trump talk fascism. Obozo yes in certain ways. Hillary yes. You people are daft.
    Threatening to jail political opponents, scapegoating a religious group, scapegoating immigrants, nativism and nationalist rhetoric.

    This is Kane Hall fascism 101 stuff.
    Odd haven't heard that. Calling criminals criminals isn't fascist either. Illegals are illegal. Get it? Which religious group is scape Goated? Muslims? Do you live in a vacuum? Is the basement that dark? Are you really this easily offended? Tell mom you want meatloaf.
    Criminals are convicted of crimes in a court under the rule of law.
    Not when they are in charge of the system and it's all corrupt. Name another case where the law enforcement agencyou say they did it but don't recommend charges fir lack of intent? Prosecutors make those decisions not law enforcement. That both the President and the AG are actually involved makes it absolutely ridiculous.

    If law enforcement doesn't think they have enough evidence to get a conviction, they have every right to share that opinion with the prosecution.

    It happens all the time.
    They can share but the prosecutor decides. In this case they have all the evidence but say they lack intent an element of all crimes. This is a prima facie crime. Much like a traffic citation. You either knew or should have known it was illegal.
    So the Justice Department could have prosecuted but choose not to do so because they hate losing.

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    @Sledog implosion Tuesday is going to be spectacular.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    This election is easy. Neoliberal or fascist, your call.

    Fascist?
    Yes, fascist. Did he stutter?

    Odd never heard Trump talk fascism. Obozo yes in certain ways. Hillary yes. You people are daft.
    Threatening to jail political opponents, scapegoating a religious group, scapegoating immigrants, nativism and nationalist rhetoric.

    This is Kane Hall fascism 101 stuff.
    Odd haven't heard that. Calling criminals criminals isn't fascist either. Illegals are illegal. Get it? Which religious group is scape Goated? Muslims? Do you live in a vacuum? Is the basement that dark? Are you really this easily offended? Tell mom you want meatloaf.
    Criminals are convicted of crimes in a court under the rule of law.
    Not when they are in charge of the system and it's all corrupt. Name another case where the law enforcement agencyou say they did it but don't recommend charges fir lack of intent? Prosecutors make those decisions not law enforcement. That both the President and the AG are actually involved makes it absolutely ridiculous.

    If law enforcement doesn't think they have enough evidence to get a conviction, they have every right to share that opinion with the prosecution.

    It happens all the time.
    They can share but the prosecutor decides. In this case they have all the evidence but say they lack intent an element of all crimes. This is a prima facie crime. Much like a traffic citation. You either knew or should have known it was illegal.
    So the Justice Department could have prosecuted but choose not to do so because they hate losing.

    When did you hear the justice department say they wouldn't because of lack of evidence or other reason? Maybe you could show me where justice reviewed everything and declined to prosecute?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    @Sledog implosion Tuesday is going to be spectacular.

    No such thing will happen. I'm not the pinkish red power ranger crew.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    People forget that Hitler built Germany into a real powerhouse while he was there.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    PurpleJ said:

    People forget that Hitler built Germany into a real powerhouse while he was there.

    Charlemagne isn't walking back through that door.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter
    I can think for myself don't need my political officer telling me shit. 'Eh comrade?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    I can think for myself don't need my political officer telling me shit. 'Eh comrade?

    Yet you believe all the shit on NY post and breitbart. And other tin foil cap websites. You are a model of an independent thinker.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,461 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    I can think for myself don't need my political officer telling me shit. 'Eh comrade?

    Yet you believe all the shit on NY post and breitbart. And other tin foil cap websites. You are a model of an independent thinker.
    Coming from Mr If-it-isn't-reported-by-the-Clinton-News-Network-It-Didn't-Happen.


    Are you familiar with a website called Wikileaks? Or is that not credible either?










    You might be the dumbest mother fucker in the history of dumb mother fuckers.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    I can think for myself don't need my political officer telling me shit. 'Eh comrade?

    Yet you believe all the shit on NY post and breitbart. And other tin foil cap websites. You are a model of an independent thinker.
    Coming from Mr If-it-isn't-reported-by-the-Clinton-News-Network-It-Didn't-Happen.


    Are you familiar with a website called Wikileaks? Or is that not credible either?










    You might be the dumbest mother fucker in the history of dumb mother fuckers.
    Rent free....
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    I can think for myself don't need my political officer telling me shit. 'Eh comrade?

    Yet you believe all the shit on NY post and breitbart. And other tin foil cap websites. You are a model of an independent thinker.
    Coming from Mr If-it-isn't-reported-by-the-Clinton-News-Network-It-Didn't-Happen.


    Are you familiar with a website called Wikileaks? Or is that not credible either?










    You might be the dumbest mother fucker in the history of dumb mother fuckers.
    Did you just imply that wikileaks is independent?
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,461 Founders Club

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    I can think for myself don't need my political officer telling me shit. 'Eh comrade?

    Yet you believe all the shit on NY post and breitbart. And other tin foil cap websites. You are a model of an independent thinker.
    Coming from Mr If-it-isn't-reported-by-the-Clinton-News-Network-It-Didn't-Happen.


    Are you familiar with a website called Wikileaks? Or is that not credible either?










    You might be the dumbest mother fucker in the history of dumb mother fuckers.
    Did you just imply that wikileaks is independent?
    Did you imply Wikileaks did NOT go after the Bush Administration during the Iraq war?
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,461 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    I can think for myself don't need my political officer telling me shit. 'Eh comrade?

    Yet you believe all the shit on NY post and breitbart. And other tin foil cap websites. You are a model of an independent thinker.
    Coming from Mr If-it-isn't-reported-by-the-Clinton-News-Network-It-Didn't-Happen.


    Are you familiar with a website called Wikileaks? Or is that not credible either?










    You might be the dumbest mother fucker in the history of dumb mother fuckers.
    Rent free....
    OK!
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    I can think for myself don't need my political officer telling me shit. 'Eh comrade?

    Yet you believe all the shit on NY post and breitbart. And other tin foil cap websites. You are a model of an independent thinker.
    Coming from Mr If-it-isn't-reported-by-the-Clinton-News-Network-It-Didn't-Happen.


    Are you familiar with a website called Wikileaks? Or is that not credible either?










    You might be the dumbest mother fucker in the history of dumb mother fuckers.
    Did you just imply that wikileaks is independent?
    Did you imply Wikileaks did NOT go after the Bush Administration during the Iraq war?
    Holy fuck you are pressing. You are going to be very disappointed on Tuesday evening.

    BTW, I've read a bunch of the wiki leaks shit. There's nothing there, that's the best part. Hillary coordinated with the DNC. Shocking. She used her foundation for political gain. Shocking.

    Fucking simpleton you are.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    I can think for myself don't need my political officer telling me shit. 'Eh comrade?

    Yet you believe all the shit on NY post and breitbart. And other tin foil cap websites. You are a model of an independent thinker.
    Coming from Mr If-it-isn't-reported-by-the-Clinton-News-Network-It-Didn't-Happen.


    Are you familiar with a website called Wikileaks? Or is that not credible either?










    You might be the dumbest mother fucker in the history of dumb mother fuckers.
    Did you just imply that wikileaks is independent?
    Did you imply Wikileaks did NOT go after the Bush Administration during the Iraq war?
    Holy fuck you are pressing. You are going to be very disappointed on Tuesday evening.

    BTW, I've read a bunch of the wiki leaks shit. There's nothing there, that's the best part. Hillary coordinated with the DNC. Shocking. She used her foundation for political gain. Shocking.

    Fucking simpleton you are.
    She illegally took money from foreign nations and pedaled influence. She assisted foreign governments in buying US strategic assets for money. All this shits illegal. Are you really so far gone as to have no morals? Oh I forgot " the ends justify the means" right comrade?

    Please move to the socialist paradise of your choice. Oh yeah they're all shit holes. Why do you want America to be a shit hole? Are you a closet potty fetish boy?

    No use talking to the Pinkish Red Power Ranger crew.