Remind me again why we don't want Gary Pinkel
Comments
-
It's pretty simple. Most of us want Sark gone. I'm just not on the Mora bandwagon. Sark did better against Furd than Mora did. Pretty sure Oregon will smoke Mora.dhdawg said:
u said can't, if u had said HASN'T that argument would've made sense, now LEAVEYour_Mom said:
When did he beat them? We will see Sat how good he is, I'm predicting his relative performance we be similar to his relative performance against Furd.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
When did Jim L. Mora lose to Oregon, LOSER?Your_Mom said:
Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.
And no, this isn't IMALOSER.
I want a HC that does better.
The reasons we don't want Pinkel, are the same reasons we don't want Mora.
It's funny of some of you clones can't think for yourselves, and have to march in lock step to a few posters here.
It is just like on Kim's bored.
*Gurgle*
-
I don't care if they've played or not... How many times has Mora beaten Oregon? Yeah, that's what I thought...TierbsHsotBoobs said:
When did Jim L. Mora lose to Oregon, LOSER?Your_Mom said:
Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.
-
With respect to mora, lipo.
The anointing he gets sometimes on this site is doogish. -
He's going to get plungered. The dooginess over Mora on this site is a bit much. I think he has potential and has done a failrly good job so far, but some on here are as bad as Doogs are about Sark, hence why they creamed in their pants over Mora's Kick ass Presser on Brock and Danny, and linked a story about a former player donating one million to UCLA's program.Your_Mom said:
When did he beat them? We will see Sat how good he is, I'm predicting his relative performance we be similar to his relative performance against Furd.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
When did Jim L. Mora lose to Oregon, LOSER?Your_Mom said:
Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.
And no, this isn't IMALOSER.
-
Great coaches take their program has far as the Iron Laws allow. Pinkel has taken Missouri far higher than any coach has taken that program since Dan Devine left 40 years ago. UW is a historic top 25 program, Missouri is not.
Pinkel would not have been 7-5 at UW. He would not have been a .500 coach. He would've taken Lambo's recruits to Rose Bowls in 1999, 2000, and 2001 (you realize Skippy was one win away in '99, 01) and the program would never have fallen off.
If he would leave Missouri I would take him in a heartbeat. -
Not true. Utah would be right up there with Oregon if Urban Meyer was still their coach. Bill Snyder has taken Kansas State further than your fucktarded Iron Laws. Take your Iron Laws and shove them up your cunt.Auburndawg said:Great coaches take their program has far as the Iron Laws allow. Pinkel has taken Missouri far higher than any coach has taken that program since Dan Devine left 40 years ago. UW is a historic top 25 program, Missouri is not.
Pinkel would not have been 7-5 at UW. He would not have been a .500 coach. He would've taken Lambo's recruits to Rose Bowls in 1999, 2000, and 2001 (you realize Skippy was one win away in '99, 01) and the program would never have fallen off.
If he would leave Missouri I would take him in a heartbeat.
The goal isn't to get a coach like Pinkel. It's to get a coach that can beat Oregon and take us to a fucking Rose Bowl.
-
That's exactly what IMALOSER would say.Your_Mom said:
When did he beat them? We will see Sat how good he is, I'm predicting his relative performance we be similar to his relative performance against Furd.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
When did Jim L. Mora lose to Oregon, LOSER?Your_Mom said:
Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.
And no, this isn't IMALOSER. -
First of all this isn't factual. In 2001 the Rose Bowl was the national title game and UW was 8-3 in the regular season while Oregon was 10-1. UW had no shot at a BCS game.Auburndawg said:Great coaches take their program has far as the Iron Laws allow. Pinkel has taken Missouri far higher than any coach has taken that program since Dan Devine left 40 years ago. UW is a historic top 25 program, Missouri is not.
Pinkel would not have been 7-5 at UW. He would not have been a .500 coach. He would've taken Lambo's recruits to Rose Bowls in 1999, 2000, and 2001 (you realize Skippy was one win away in '99, 01) and the program would never have fallen off.
If he would leave Missouri I would take him in a heartbeat.
In 1999 the team started off 0-2 then Rick decided to switch his entire offense to the option as he tried to win the worst Pac-10 ever.
I don't think Pinkel would have done what Rick did in 2000. That wasn't a great talented team. It had good talent but we saw teams like 1994, 1996 and 1997 achieve less with much talent.
I think Pinkel would have been exactly what Lambo was. Have a solid W-L record but would always have some bad losses.
Like Lambright had a 9-2 regular season but mostly he was a 7-4 coach. That's Gary Pinkel IMO. -
You don't get it.RoadDawg55 said:
He's going to get plungered. The dooginess over Mora on this site is a bit much. I think he has potential and has done a failrly good job so far, but some on here are as bad as Doogs are about Sark, hence why they creamed in their pants over Mora's Kick ass Presser on Brock and Danny, and linked a story about a former player donating one million to UCLA's program.Your_Mom said:
When did he beat them? We will see Sat how good he is, I'm predicting his relative performance we be similar to his relative performance against Furd.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
When did Jim L. Mora lose to Oregon, LOSER?Your_Mom said:
Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.
And no, this isn't IMALOSER. -
What don't I get? Explain to me what I am missing. I like Mora, just want to LIFPO before I crown him like some already have. He has beaten one team that finished the year in the top 25 (Nebraska) the past two years. What game has he won that was a "wow" game?TheKobeStopper said:
You don't get it.RoadDawg55 said:
He's going to get plungered. The dooginess over Mora on this site is a bit much. I think he has potential and has done a failrly good job so far, but some on here are as bad as Doogs are about Sark, hence why they creamed in their pants over Mora's Kick ass Presser on Brock and Danny, and linked a story about a former player donating one million to UCLA's program.Your_Mom said:
When did he beat them? We will see Sat how good he is, I'm predicting his relative performance we be similar to his relative performance against Furd.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
When did Jim L. Mora lose to Oregon, LOSER?Your_Mom said:
Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.
And no, this isn't IMALOSER.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)