Remind me again why we don't want Gary Pinkel
Comments
-
BUT HE DOES MORE WITH LESS!!!!RaceBannon said:Why would he be a rock star here? You mean like Ty was? I take it the answer is zero for what,15 seasons? Why would we want Riley?
I also heard on a podcast(the fuck?) that he's better than Carroll. -
-
2001 Missouri 4–7 3–5 T–4th (North)
2002 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (North)
2003 Missouri 8–5 4–4 3rd (North) L Independence
2004 Missouri 5–6 3–5 T–3rd (North)
2005 Missouri 7–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) W Independence
2006 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) L Sun
2007 Missouri 12–2 7–1 T–1st (North) W Cotton 5 4
2008 Missouri 10–4 5–3 T–1st (North) W Alamo 16 19
2009 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) L Texas
2010 Missouri 10–3 6–2 T–1st (North) L Insight 18 18
2011 Missouri 8–5[6] 5–4 5th W Independence
Missouri Tigers (Southeastern Conference) (2012–present)
2012 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (East)
2013 Missouri 7–0 3–0
Missouri: 97–61 52–48
This is why we don't want Gary Pinkel. -
Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.
-
You realize Mora hasn't coached against Oregon right?Your_Mom said:
Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.
Why do you always press so badly on every fucking account that you create? -
When did Jim L. Mora lose to Oregon, LOSER?Your_Mom said:
Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.
-
So you are predicting a UCLA win on Sat?He_Needs_More_Time said:
You realize Mora hasn't coached against Oregon right?
Why do you always press so badly on every fucking account that you create?
How much money you betting on that?
This is the only account I've had here.
-
If you post like a LOSER, I assume you are IMALOSER, LOSER.Your_Mom said:
So you are predicting a UCLA win on Sat?He_Needs_More_Time said:
You realize Mora hasn't coached against Oregon right?
Why do you always press so badly on every fucking account that you create?
How much money you betting on that?
This is the only account I've had here.
-
When did he beat them? We will see Sat how good he is, I'm predicting his relative performance we be similar to his relative performance against Furd.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
When did Jim L. Mora lose to Oregon, LOSER?Your_Mom said:
Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.
And no, this isn't IMALOSER. -
u said can't, if u had said HASN'T that argument would've made sense, now LEAVEYour_Mom said:
When did he beat them? We will see Sat how good he is, I'm predicting his relative performance we be similar to his relative performance against Furd.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
When did Jim L. Mora lose to Oregon, LOSER?Your_Mom said:
Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.
And no, this isn't IMALOSER.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
