KC Chiefs sign Bishop Sankey
Comments
-
Anybody talked to his grandpa?
-
FUCK YEAH. I like Bishop a lot. I wish he would've stayed around to play for Pete, to be honest. I think they would've had a great relationship.DerekJohnson said: -
Good for Sankey.
Tennessee is where promising prospects go to die behind a terrible o line.
Locker could have been decent if he wasnt getting injured, often due to his lines incompetence -
D line as a safety perhapsPostGameOrangeSlices said:Good for Sankey.
Tennessee is where promising prospects go to die behind a terrible o line.
Locker could have been decent if he wasnt getting injured, often due to his lines incompetence -
I know the numbers say otherwise, but I'll always think Polk was better. I like Sankey, but I don't think his game translates well at the highest level.
-
Imagine Polk on this team with a line that actually opens up holes. Plus he'd be devasting catching the ball out of the backfield from Browning.Doogles said:I know the numbers say otherwise, but I'll always think Polk was better. I like Sankey, but I don't think his game translates well at the highest level.
-
As a college back, I'd go:Doogles said:I know the numbers say otherwise, but I'll always think Polk was better. I like Sankey, but I don't think his game translates well at the highest level.
1. Sankey
2. Gaskin
3. Polk
But Gaskin has time to move up, and probably will. -
Hard to rank them. They are all around the same level player. All really, really good. I loved all of them.AIRWOLF said:
As a college back, I'd go:Doogles said:I know the numbers say otherwise, but I'll always think Polk was better. I like Sankey, but I don't think his game translates well at the highest level.
1. Sankey
2. Gaskin
3. Polk
But Gaskin has time to move up, and probably will.
Polk ran so fucking hard, Sankey was like a 15 pound heavier Gaskin and Gaskin is so quick. I love them all. -
I'll always love Polk for the 2010 Apple Cup.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Hard to rank them. They are all around the same level player. All really, really good. I loved all of them.AIRWOLF said:
As a college back, I'd go:Doogles said:I know the numbers say otherwise, but I'll always think Polk was better. I like Sankey, but I don't think his game translates well at the highest level.
1. Sankey
2. Gaskin
3. Polk
But Gaskin has time to move up, and probably will.
Polk ran so fucking hard, Sankey was like a 15 pound heavier Gaskin and Gaskin is so quick. I love them all. -
I agree with all of that. And it is hard to really rank them because of recency bias and the wholly different offenses they played in.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Hard to rank them. They are all around the same level player. All really, really good. I loved all of them.AIRWOLF said:
As a college back, I'd go:Doogles said:I know the numbers say otherwise, but I'll always think Polk was better. I like Sankey, but I don't think his game translates well at the highest level.
1. Sankey
2. Gaskin
3. Polk
But Gaskin has time to move up, and probably will.
Polk ran so fucking hard, Sankey was like a 15 pound heavier Gaskin and Gaskin is so quick. I love them all.
Sankey and Polk would both be really fun to watch behind this line. And the stuff Gaskin does in the open field is pretty breathtaking.
