Dumbest "Fire Sark" Related Responses I've Heard Today
1) Questioning the future of Sark means that you are making a decision to fire him today versus the end of the season
2) Firing Sark would be bad for recruiting (particularly since we have limited #'s this year and are striking out on recruits left and right)
3) Sark could still get to 9-4 this year and 9 wins > 7 wins regardless of how you obtain the 9 wins (because that doesn't apparently matter)
Comments
-
Doogman is beyond help. Most of those posters are completely brainwashed.
-
I've actually been surprised with the number of people that actually realize he needs to be fired. They seem to be outnumbering those who say we are stoopid for calling him out and saying he should be fired.
-
The fact Kim is so silent and letting all this talk goes on speaks volumes.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I've actually been surprised with the number of people that actually realize he needs to be fired. They seem to be outnumbering those who say we are stoopid for calling him out and saying he should be fired.
This has legs. -
Penn State got a 5 star quarterback last year coming off Sandusky. But at UW firing a coach means punting an entire recruiting class.
-
Not only are people generally seeing the writing on the wall, but they are also being very logical about it.
Going back to Tyrone, we were so fucking bad that it was almost as if people didn't realize how far away we were from being good.
Those that back Sark without judgment compare him to Tyrone - and he's miles ahead of Tyrone.
But the curse for Sark is that he's built up a roster where we can see that there's talent there to win with. We can see the fact that the program is close. We can see that he keeps making the same mistakes over and over that lead to losses.
There is also no race card in play here.
This is a decision that is all about business ... nothing personal this time ... just business. -
Kim is being silent because he's realizes he might actually be wrong on something.He_Needs_More_Time said:
The fact Kim is so silent and letting all this talk goes on speaks volumes.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I've actually been surprised with the number of people that actually realize he needs to be fired. They seem to be outnumbering those who say we are stoopid for calling him out and saying he should be fired.
This has legs.
What will be telling is when he doogs all over himself after meaningless wins vs. Cal & Colorado.
He'll also be spending time on the Hoops bored. Him and Fleens wander over there when football shit starts blowing up in their face. -
Our "wonderful" basketball program that was supposed to be Duke of the West picked to finish 8th in the conference. lol.CheersWestDawg said:
Kim is being silent because he's realizes he might actually be wrong on something.He_Needs_More_Time said:
The fact Kim is so silent and letting all this talk goes on speaks volumes.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I've actually been surprised with the number of people that actually realize he needs to be fired. They seem to be outnumbering those who say we are stoopid for calling him out and saying he should be fired.
This has legs.
What will be telling is when he doogs all over himself after meaningless wins vs. Cal & Colorado.
He'll also be spending time on the Hoops bored. Him and Fleens wander over there when football shit starts blowing up in their face.
This is why ASU was Arizona 2007 not Oregon 2008. Fans were all riled up ready to fire Ty then UW defeated Stanford the following week on the road and that quieted the masses.
However, if Sark were to lose to the Cougs ending the season on a three game losing streak that could be his Oregon 2008 game where he can't recover from that. -
Firing the coach with limited numbers is perfect timing.
This is a great year to Fire Sark. -
4. If you fired sark who would you get that was better.
-
Low numbers, breaking in a new QB, soft OOC schedule for a new coach to get momentum for, etc.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Firing the coach with limited numbers is perfect timing.
This is a great year to Fire Sark.
It makes perfect sense too. That's why it's not happening.
Fuck! -
WhiskeyDawg for AD and coach.MikeDamone said:4. If you fired sark who would you get that was better.
Abundance.
-
-
MikeDamone said:
4. If you fired sark who would you get that was better.
Thank you Damone - that's another quality one.
-
Very good point, although I think it will end up being a decent sized class. I'm guessing it will be anywhere from 20-25.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Firing the coach with limited numbers is perfect timing.
This is a great year to Fire Sark.
-
It's easier for the new guy to suddenly senior guys like ASJ off the roster. Good point.RoadDawg55 said:
Very good point, although I think it will end up being a decent sized class. I'm guessing it will be anywhere from 20-25.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Firing the coach with limited numbers is perfect timing.
This is a great year to Fire Sark. -
I finally got my twitter back. Thanks for this. I'm going to work.TierbsHsotBoobs said:Just click this link:
https://twitter.com/JTHatch253 -
I'm willing to give Sark a sixth year unless you guarantee the new guy gets to the Rose Bowl his first year.
#imaloserfuckingstupid -
This kid is an idiot. He now wants Sark because he's a "good recruiter" then brings up how you can have all the talent but still lose like the Yankees.
He's a classic example of why abortion should be legal. -
Who gives a fuck about recrooting? I mean, in any normal situation it matters. But we get our 20-25, and it's all going to be a bunch of guys Sark had to settle for after he whiffed, and then try to convince everybody that the two star he just got is a diamond in the rough.
Remember when Dezden Petty was the next Stanley Havili according to Sark? Remember when he lost a bunch of linemen and had to settle for Atoe, and tried to tell everybody that he was a future Top 5 pick?
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
WhiskeyDawg's Tan for AD and coach.MikeDamone said:4. If you fired sark who would you get that was better.
Abundance. -
The "curse of Sark" is that anybody with half a football brain can look at the 2013 Husky roster or game films and see that his weakness is as wide and deep as Hells Canyon: THE FRIGGIN LACK OF PAC-12 CALIBER OFFENSIVE AND DEFENSIVE LINEMEN!! We're getting killed on the line-of-scrimmage even by some of the more mediocre conference opponents. With good offensive and defensive lines, Sark wouldn't need good special teams which he apparently has little intention of ever bothering with.Tequilla said:Not only are people generally seeing the writing on the wall, but they are also being very logical about it.
Going back to Tyrone, we were so fucking bad that it was almost as if people didn't realize how far away we were from being good.
Those that back Sark without judgment compare him to Tyrone - and he's miles ahead of Tyrone.
But the curse for Sark is that he's built up a roster where we can see that there's talent there to win with. We can see the fact that the program is close. We can see that he keeps making the same mistakes over and over that lead to losses.
There is also no race card in play here.
This is a decision that is all about business ... nothing personal this time ... just business. -
The new version of Tequilla is much better than the old one.
-
I called for Sark's head 2 years ago. A lot of you ignant turds were on dawgman calling me crazy. You guys are a bunch of hypocrites for calling "doogman" guys out. You stupid fucks were them a year ago. Sark needs to go NOW, or we're doomed for 3 more years
-
You dumb fuck. Are you just a fucking idiot or do you work on it? Most of us are here because we were banned from doogman in 2009 for opposing the sark hire from day 1. This is your worst post yet. We were here, you weren't. As usual, your late to the party. Futt fucker.puppylove_sugarsteel said:I called for Sark's head 2 years ago. A lot of you ignant turds were on dawgman calling me crazy. You guys are a bunch of hypocrites for calling "doogman" guys out. You stupid fucks were them a year ago. Sark needs to go NOW, or we're doomed for 3 more years
-
I think the nurse mixed up sugarpuppysteel's meds. He's been off lately.MikeDamone said:
You dumb fuck. Are you just a fucking idiot or do you work on it? Most of us are here because we were banned from doogman in 2009 for opposing the sark hire from day 1. This is your worst post yet. We were here, you weren't. As usual, your late to the party. Futt fucker.puppylove_sugarsteel said:I called for Sark's head 2 years ago. A lot of you ignant turds were on dawgman calling me crazy. You guys are a bunch of hypocrites for calling "doogman" guys out. You stupid fucks were them a year ago. Sark needs to go NOW, or we're doomed for 3 more years
-
Fuck you, PLSS. You are the dumb fuck who predicted Sark to win the North, and were talking about Sark coaching a great game against Stanford just a few weeks ago. You're full of shit. Start taking your meds and pounding whiskey again. You were way cooler when you did.puppylove_sugarsteel said:I called for Sark's head 2 years ago. A lot of you ignant turds were on dawgman calling me crazy. You guys are a bunch of hypocrites for calling "doogman" guys out. You stupid fucks were them a year ago. Sark needs to go NOW, or we're doomed for 3 more years
-
Dude just a few days ago you were saying next year is Sark's year. After the Oregon game you were calling us "ignant" for saying Sark needs to go.puppylove_sugarsteel said:I called for Sark's head 2 years ago. A lot of you ignant turds were on dawgman calling me crazy. You guys are a bunch of hypocrites for calling "doogman" guys out. You stupid fucks were them a year ago. Sark needs to go NOW, or we're doomed for 3 more years
You literally said you hope they extend Sark just to piss us off.
Only YOU are suggesting Sark was a good coach before this game. Just like every other Doog you are now back peddling denying you ever liked Sark.
You are the typical Doogman poster.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
