Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
San Diego Union Tribune hasn't endorsed a democrat for president in 148 years, until today
OZONE
Member Posts: 2,510
in Tug Tavern
Their editorial board fears that Trump would be America’s Hugo Chávez
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/the-conversation/sd-hillary-clinton-endorsement-for-president-20160929-story.html
But at least Trump still has that National Enquirer endorsement...
Comments
-
More pointless drivel
-
Shove it in your greasey cum container blowzone,.
-
You mad bros?
-
So people who get paid to deceive and manipulate don't want Trump to be president. Got it.
-
Huh? You are suggesting the editors of the vast majority of the nations news papers are paid to deceive?Fenderbender123 said:So people who get paid to deceive and manipulate don't want Trump to be president. Got it.
Sounds like a conspiracy theory.
Good think we have the National Enquirer to save us... -
It's not black and white. You can write an article that is 100% (legally) factual, but is structured and worded in a way to sway(e?) the reader's opinion.
Here's an example from this very website.
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/entertainment/theater/sd-me-review-trumpcard-20161004-story.html
Look at this bold part. Completely unnecessary in a NEWS article. This is not an opinion piece, yet for some reason it's fine to include bullshit like this. Seriously, "breaks all the rules?" Or could they have worded it "does things differently"? Yes, they could have, but why do that when "breaks all the rules" makes him sound like a bad person?
That’s because Trump has demonstrated how a candidacy that breaks all the rules (and bursts the brain cells of half the nation) can still succeed in racing right to the verge of ultimate power.
Here's another paragraph:Actually, that’s not quite Daisey talking in “The Trump Card”: It’s him portraying the specter of Roy Cohn, the lawyer and McCarthyist linchpin who became Trump’s attorney and longtime adviser after the government accused the developer in 1973 of racial discrimination in housing.
Could have ended the sentence before the bolded part. But, you just can't miss an opportunity to take a jab at a guy you don't want to be president!
One more example:First of all, Daisey — who notes at the top of the show that he’s an artist and thus “a professional liar” — admits he admires Trump’s performative flair and instincts for improv.
Uh oh...Looks like this guy said something positive about Trump! Let's make sure to precede that by mentioning how he claims to be a "professional liar" so that the readers will think he's lying about the positive thing he said about Trump.
Oh, but then let's not mention how he claimed to be a professional liar before he said this...He adds, “You’ll be shocked to learn Donald Trump is not working for your vote.”
This writer is well aware of the attention span of his readers...
Seriously, this is so EASY for me to see. I should start a website dedicated to pointing out all this bullshit.
-
Trump, if you're reading this, consider hiring me as part of your campaign staff.
-
How many bonafide criminals have we had on the ballot in that time span? That Hillary is a criminal is well known that her supporters don't care tells me why our nation is so fucked up.
-
Look at this bold part. Completely unnecessary in a NEWS article. This is not an opinion piece, yet for some reason it's fine to include bullshit like this. Seriously, "breaks all the rules?" Or could they have worded it "does things differently"? Yes, they could have, but why do that when "breaks all the rules" makes him sound like a bad person?Fenderbender123 said:It's not black and white. You can write an article that is 100% (legally) factual, but is structured and worded in a way to sway(e?) the reader's opinion.
Here's an example from this very website.
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/entertainment/theater/sd-me-review-trumpcard-20161004-story.html
That’s because Trump has demonstrated how a candidacy that breaks all the rules (and bursts the brain cells of half the nation) can still succeed in racing right to the verge of ultimate power.
Here's another paragraph:Actually, that’s not quite Daisey talking in “The Trump Card”: It’s him portraying the specter of Roy Cohn, the lawyer and McCarthyist linchpin who became Trump’s attorney and longtime adviser after the government accused the developer in 1973 of racial discrimination in housing.
Could have ended the sentence before the bolded part. But, you just can't miss an opportunity to take a jab at a guy you don't want to be president!
One more example:First of all, Daisey — who notes at the top of the show that he’s an artist and thus “a professional liar” — admits he admires Trump’s performative flair and instincts for improv.
Uh oh...Looks like this guy said something positive about Trump! Let's make sure to precede that by mentioning how he claims to be a "professional liar" so that the readers will think he's lying about the positive thing he said about Trump.
Oh, but then let's not mention how he claimed to be a professional liar before he said this...He adds, “You’ll be shocked to learn Donald Trump is not working for your vote.”
This writer is well aware of the attention span of his readers...
Seriously, this is so EASY for me to see. I should start a website dedicated to pointing out all this bullshit.
That's an opinion piece about a play, not a news article.
HTH -
Just testing to see if anybody actually reads my posts.
