Washington Huskies Football: Biggest UW Win Since Miami 2000
Comments
-
I do love how all the kids are echoing and preaching what petersen is saying though. Beating stanford is not enough. It's not an accomplishment. It's a win. There are things to clean up and more to do. The team sounds like a unit. I love you sark but damn, the difference in how petersen coaches is all too obvious. Really though, what did sark actually do as head coach? He hired his staff and just texted in during practice and meetings. What a fucking disaster
-
Can't I just enjoy a great win over a quality opponent before gettign reminded we lose 4 down the stretch and still suck? FUCK!
-
We're not likely as good as we look (or Stanford isn't), but still yuge win.
On National TV meaning we're being discussed including by recruits.
It was a physical domination of the most physical P12 team.
It shows Peterman has us headed n the right direction.
This team has something like 66freshmen and soph.
-
Ever notice those hearts chincredible s are really facing hard to put your finger on. When you are in the throwing back Zima all night? It's hard
-
The espn half time show was beautiful. They were saying stanford was getting manhandled and you might as well change the channel. Never thought I'd hear my DAWGS get put over that hardmobey said:We're not likely as good as we look (or Stanford isn't), but still yuge win.
On National TV meaning we're being discussed including by recruits.
It was a physical domination of the most physical P12 team.
It shows Peterman has us headed n the right direction.
This team has something like 66freshmen and soph. -
Voted down for drinking ZimaPurpleReign said:Ever notice those hearts chincredible s are really facing hard to put your finger on. When you are in the throwing back Zima all night? It's hard
-
Ugggh, hmm, argh , fuck you cunt, argghphineas said:
"Real burners" ?JaWarrenJaHooker said:Technically with a post-1982 birth I'm considered a Millennial, and I was actually at the 2000 Miami game. These were the days when UW cheerleaders and band members would tour the stadium during the game. I remember being in the south side upper deck and I'm not lying when I tell you we had some real burners on the cheer squad that year. And they wore very short skirts that you could take a glance underneath as they made their way up the stairs on the second level. Cool story I know
I don't believe you're a millenial at all. I don't think "real burners" is or has ever been a thing -
In years past, we (?) blow out the three ... get clown stomped by Arizona, Stanford, and Oregon.
This year I have hope because ...
They survived Arizona ... a game they lost up until this year.
And then clown stomped Stanford.
It all adds up to one fact:
Next year is going to be special. -
Guys, this is what turning the corner would look like...allpurpleallgold said:
That monumental win even got Race on the Sark bandwagon.phineas said:
Last night's game reminded me a lot of sarks Nebraska bowl. I know I know, it was a meaningless game, I know I know Nebraska didn't want to be there, all I can remember though is washington laying the lumber to the cornhuskers, which not a single soul thought would happen, while avenging a humiliating defeat earlier in the season. I don't remember how I felt during that game but I wouldn't be surprised if it didn't feel better than even last night (which was absolutely awesome)allpurpleallgold said:So let's see...
bigger than winning a Rose Bowl.
The next season UW beat #11 Michigan, #9 Washington State and #10 Stanford. But I'm hearing that team was an embarrassment and the first signs that Rick sucked.
Then you have the next year where Washington beat both rivals, Oregon and #3 Washington State. This win is obviously much bigger than beating the number 3 team in the country that also happens to be your in state rival in their house though. Obviously.
Now we hit the Keith Gilbertson era and he never beat a top 10 team, I mean that's ridiculous. Except for the time he beat #8 Washington State. But that win isn't as good because it was the end of the season against a team that had actually earned a top 10 ranking not against a Stanford team early in the year that hasn't actually done anything to earn their ranking.
I will concede that the win was bigger than any win under Tyrone Willingham.
Then we have the Sarkisian seasons. Wins over #3 USC, #16 Nebraska team that everyone thought was better than that, #8 Stanford, and #7 Oregon State.
Hey, good for you guys if Peterman is the guy but there have been a lot of wins over a lot of top 10 teams that amounted to a whole lotta nothing the last 15 years.
Feel free to doog it up. I'll be the guy at the end of the season saying I told you so. -
It's not the win or who they beat in 2001 or 2003. It's the way they won. They dominated them from the beginning. It was very reminiscent of the early 90s teams. After watching asshole Harbaugh dominate Sark in 2010, last year's gayme and all the other losses to a team that's been at or near the top since 2010, this meant something. Most on here wouldn't have been surprised at a 24-20 win. Nobody saw this coming. Will Stanford end up being a 7-5 team? it's possible. Will the Huskies stumble? Probably, but they don't look like a four loss team to me. Enjoy it....or follow the negadawg script...allpurpleallgold said:So let's see...
bigger than winning a Rose Bowl.
The next season UW beat #11 Michigan, #9 Washington State and #10 Stanford. But I'm hearing that team was an embarrassment and the first signs that Rick sucked.
Then you have the next year where Washington beat both rivals, Oregon and #3 Washington State. This win is obviously much bigger than beating the number 3 team in the country that also happens to be your in state rival in their house though. Obviously.
Now we hit the Keith Gilbertson era and he never beat a top 10 team, I mean that's ridiculous. Except for the time he beat #8 Washington State. But that win isn't as good because it was the end of the season against a team that had actually earned a top 10 ranking not against a Stanford team early in the year that hasn't actually done anything to earn their ranking.
I will concede that the win was bigger than any win under Tyrone Willingham.
Then we have the Sarkisian seasons. Wins over #3 USC, #16 Nebraska team that everyone thought was better than that, #8 Stanford, and #7 Oregon State.
Hey, good for you guys if Peterman is the guy but there have been a lot of wins over a lot of top 10 teams that amounted to a whole lotta nothing the last 15 years.
Feel free to doog it up. I'll be the guy at the end of the season saying I told you so.
