Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What A-hole just threaded° Petersen is Koetter?

2»

Comments

  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,691

    Yeah no fucking shit he was an overrated boise state coach who didn't do shit.

    Then again I wasnt an asu fan at the time.

    Rich rod at us has beaten top ten teams on the reg and still sucks.



    I still would say graham and pete are the top coaches though in the pac.

    Which still doesn't say much.

    We are competing against the likes of mora Shaw and helton.
    And Slingblade.
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    Beating a shit Stanford team proves that wrong how?

    #7. Stanford had "elite"D. Elite Oline, Elite heisman RB with McCaffrey , top 10 defense according to EVERY pundit this week. Just because Petersen, .8546578 winning percentage, beat the shit out of them does not mean they are a "shit team".

    P&G, what little boardy cred you clung onto 2 years ago, has embarrassingly petered away into this, a last-ditch shot at relevance. Theres always next year, in Pete' 4th...
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    Yeah no fucking shit he was an overrated boise state coach who didn't do shit.

    Then again I wasnt an asu fan at the time.

    Rich rod at us has beaten top ten teams on the reg and still sucks.



    I still would say graham and pete are the top coaches though in the pac.

    you gonna mention Hawkins too puffy?
    The only ginage in this thread is your own red and raw flesh pocket.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778
    Go to bed pumpu

    Always wrong
  • ExtraChrisB
    ExtraChrisB Member Posts: 1,814

    Beating a shit Stanford team proves that wrong how?

    #7. Stanford had "elite"D. Elite Oline, Elite heisman RB with McCaffrey , top 10 defense according to EVERY pundit this week. Just because Petersen, .8546578 winning percentage, beat the shit out of them does not mean they are a "shit team".

    P&G, what little boardy cred you clung onto 2 years ago, has embarrassingly petered away into this, a last-ditch shot at relevance. Theres always next year, in Pete' 4th...
    Preach, pup.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

    Beating a shit Stanford team proves that wrong how?

    #7. Stanford had "elite"D. Elite Oline, Elite heisman RB with McCaffrey , top 10 defense according to EVERY pundit this week. Just because Petersen, .8546578 winning percentage, beat the shit out of them does not mean they are a "shit team".

    P&G, what little boardy cred you clung onto 2 years ago, has embarrassingly petered away into this, a last-ditch shot at relevance. Theres always next year, in Pete' 4th...
    All the pundits that have been saying the SEC is the best conference in the country for more than a decade?
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Beating a shit Stanford team proves that wrong how?

    #7. Stanford had "elite"D. Elite Oline, Elite heisman RB with McCaffrey , top 10 defense according to EVERY pundit this week. Just because Petersen, .8546578 winning percentage, beat the shit out of them does not mean they are a "shit team".

    P&G, what little boardy cred you clung onto 2 years ago, has embarrassingly petered away into this, a last-ditch shot at relevance. Theres always next year, in Pete' 4th...
    All the pundits that have been saying the SEC is the best conference in the country for more than a decade?
    Check. Mate.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,739 Founders Club

    Yeah no fucking shit he was an overrated boise state coach who didn't do shit.

    Then again I wasnt an asu fan at the time.

    Rich rod at us has beaten top ten teams on the reg and still sucks.



    I still would say graham and pete are the top coaches though in the pac.

    lol Graham is fucking shit.