Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Gary's Johnson

2»

Comments

  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    Why would my stock be overvalued when the company actually lost money overall as a result of employees opening phony accounts?

    And I'm not talking about the fines/penalties/lawsuit...The operating costs increased more than their revenue as a result. Also makes me wonder why anyone would think the officers coordinated this effort.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    edited September 2016
    salemcoog said:

    dnc said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    salemcoog said:

    Shimon Peres!!!!!

    Then I'll give you Jew boobs!

    image
    cohen13 > cohen12
    It's criminal that I have but only one Chin to give.
    Almost as criminal as saying this without giving the Chin you do have to give.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,128 Standard Supporter
    Fenderbender123 said:

    Why would my stock be overvalued when the company actually lost money overall as a result of employees opening phony accounts?

    And I'm not talking about the fines/penalties/lawsuit...The operating costs increased more than their revenue as a result. Also makes me wonder why anyone would think the officers coordinated this effort.

    Uh.....the gal who got run out left with $125 MILLION. You don't think she was given incentives to hit numbers? And then drive that desire down through the organization? And put pressure on the regional managers and local presidents to drive numbers?

    That shit came from the top.

    And i'm sorry if you can't see the dishonesty of Stumph signing off on annual reports AFTER he learned of the dysfunction. He's hiding behind 'materiality' but that shit isn't going to fly once the SEC starts issuing subpoenas.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,401
    edited September 2016
    It just still doesn't bother me that Gary Johnson fumbles a few times on international details because he's been entirely clear and on-point regarding his domestic agenda.

    Maybe he should just start wearing an ear-piece to fool the foolish:

    image

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,128 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2016
    And here's some more Jew boobs for those not following the banking thread:

    image

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    /\ /\ /\ /\ /\

    this
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    PurpleThrobber said:

    Fenderbender123 said:

    Why would my stock be overvalued when the company actually lost money overall as a result of employees opening phony accounts?

    And I'm not talking about the fines/penalties/lawsuit...The operating costs increased more than their revenue as a result. Also makes me wonder why anyone would think the officers coordinated this effort.

    Uh.....the gal who got run out left with $125 MILLION. You don't think she was given incentives to hit numbers? And then drive that desire down through the organization? And put pressure on the regional managers and local presidents to drive numbers?

    That shit came from the top.

    And i'm sorry if you can't see the dishonesty of Stumph signing off on annual reports AFTER he learned of the dysfunction. He's hiding behind 'materiality' but that shit isn't going to fly once the SEC starts issuing subpoenas.

    She's the one who implemented the sales strategy of focusing on cross-selling. And honest cross-selling actually did occur, and was much more common than the phony accounts thing. If you isolate the phony accounts, however, it resulted in a loss for the bank. It doesn't make sense to conflate the two. But, I have been awake for about 40 hours straight so maybe I'm just not thinking clearly.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited September 2016
    Fenderbender123 said:

    Why would my stock be overvalued when the company actually lost money overall as a result of employees opening phony accounts?

    And I'm not talking about the fines/penalties/lawsuit...The operating costs increased more than their revenue as a result. Also makes me wonder why anyone would think the officers coordinated this effort.

    Maybe your stock lost value because everyone now sees what a fucking shitshow WF is for doing such stupid shit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    edited September 2016
    dflea said:

    Fenderbender123 said:

    Why would my stock be overvalued when the company actually lost money overall as a result of employees opening phony accounts?

    And I'm not talking about the fines/penalties/lawsuit...The operating costs increased more than their revenue as a result. Also makes me wonder why anyone would think the officers coordinated this effort.

    Maybe your stock lost value because everyone now sees what a fucking shitshow WF is for doing such stupid shit.
    Reputation is understandable. It's the federal government fining corporations in addition to the reputational and operational damages they've already endured that I don't like.

    And honestly, WF is just the flavor of the week. There's always a scandal involving one of the major banks. I'm not sure why this one is getting so much attention since the damages were so minimal. I think it's because the media sees an opportunity to get clicks by mentioning "5,000+ employees fired". That's definitely an attention grabber.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=bank+of+america+scandals&oq=bank+of+america+scandals&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.3391j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

    https://www.google.com/search?q=bank+of+america+scandals&oq=bank+of+america+scandals&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.3391j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=Citi+bank+scandals

    https://www.google.com/search?q=larry+sanders&oq=larry+sanders&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l3j69i61j69i60.1287j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=chase+bank+scandals
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    HFNY said:

    It just still doesn't bother me that Gary Johnson fumbles a few times on international details because he's been entirely clear and on-point regarding his domestic agenda.

    Maybe he should just start wearing an ear-piece to fool the foolish:

    image

    image

    For fucksticks like you, she was wearing a microphone in plain view on her jacket, just as Trump was.

    But carry on with your tin foil hat.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    edited September 2016
    RaceBannon said:

    dflea said:

    Fenderbender123 said:

    Why would my stock be overvalued when the company actually lost money overall as a result of employees opening phony accounts?

    And I'm not talking about the fines/penalties/lawsuit...The operating costs increased more than their revenue as a result. Also makes me wonder why anyone would think the officers coordinated this effort.

    Maybe your stock lost value because everyone now sees what a fucking shitshow WF is for doing such stupid shit.
    Plain talk like this is what we need more of

    For Christ's sake, Race...if we can't have an intelligent discussion about the ramifications and repercussions of a complex corporate banking scandal on Hardcore Husky, then I don't know where the fuck to go. Dawgman? I wonder if that fag GoldDawgs still posts his shitty political opinions there...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter