Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
What I liked, What I'm concerned about and stanford...
DoogieMcDoogerson
Member Posts: 2,526
Liked
======
Half time adjustments. We committed to the run coming out and we also for the most part went with the hot hand. It was telling to see Coleman in there as RB1 in OT. Defense improved in 2nd half, too. We out-coached them in the 2nd half. Browning looked good throwing the ball, John Ross is legit, Chico is a threat, Pettis is a good possession receiver over the middle. The OL made the holes to commit to running the ball. Browning showed good scrambling/take what they give ability. Special teams made plays.
Concerns
=======
1) Stupid penalties -- false starts, PI calls
2) The Wildcat needs to die
3) I felt we got a little too conservative late in 2nd half trying to run clock
4) Obviously not containing a mobile QB, the success of the read-option in the 1st half
5) Poor tackling. Lack of edge pass rushers
6) Gave up too many explosives
Stanford Match-up
==============
They are a run-first group, with multiple TE Sets. Conservative offense. We are going to have trouble containing Mcaffery but everyone does. We will score and move the ball but more of it's going to have to come in the air this week. It could come down to winning the turnover battle. I'm actually more concerned about Oregon than Stanford because we did not do well against the read option attack/mobile QB. We're not going to be too concerned about the QB for Stanford
Low scoring game in the 20s by both teams, we probably lose.
======
Half time adjustments. We committed to the run coming out and we also for the most part went with the hot hand. It was telling to see Coleman in there as RB1 in OT. Defense improved in 2nd half, too. We out-coached them in the 2nd half. Browning looked good throwing the ball, John Ross is legit, Chico is a threat, Pettis is a good possession receiver over the middle. The OL made the holes to commit to running the ball. Browning showed good scrambling/take what they give ability. Special teams made plays.
Concerns
=======
1) Stupid penalties -- false starts, PI calls
2) The Wildcat needs to die
3) I felt we got a little too conservative late in 2nd half trying to run clock
4) Obviously not containing a mobile QB, the success of the read-option in the 1st half
5) Poor tackling. Lack of edge pass rushers
6) Gave up too many explosives
Stanford Match-up
==============
They are a run-first group, with multiple TE Sets. Conservative offense. We are going to have trouble containing Mcaffery but everyone does. We will score and move the ball but more of it's going to have to come in the air this week. It could come down to winning the turnover battle. I'm actually more concerned about Oregon than Stanford because we did not do well against the read option attack/mobile QB. We're not going to be too concerned about the QB for Stanford
Low scoring game in the 20s by both teams, we probably lose.
Comments
-
What I liked:
What I'm concerned about:
TL; don't read -
Fuck off and go back to dawgman if you don't want to read about football.haie said:
What I liked:
What I'm concerned about:
TL; don't read -
Press harder.haie said:What I liked:
What I'm concerned about:
TL; don't read -
Beating a "giant killer" that had to play a receiver at quarterback and another receiver at running back, plus a mountain west d line is fucking special. Fuck, some of you love slurping purple sludge out of Chris "It's Hard In This League" Petersen's asshole. We were woefully unclutch and unprepared. The quality of the conference is our only hope, unless these coaches ball the fuck up and clean up the 20+ issues this team exhibited.EsophagealFeces said:
Press harder.haie said:What I liked:
What I'm concerned about:
TL; don't read
If you watched the Stanford game and this game and were a neutral observer, and didn't read ESPN's stupid fuck rankings, you would think they will buttfuck us, even at home. And that is unacceptable.
There's your fucking football analysis you dumb fucking alley mutt fucking doogs. -
A WR at QB? Wtf are you talking about?haie said:
Beating a "giant killer" that had to play a receiver at quarterback and another receiver at running back, plus a mountain west d line is fucking special. Fuck, some of you love slurping purple sludge out of Chris "It's Hard In This League" Petersen's asshole. We were woefully unclutch and unprepared. The quality of the conference is our only hope, unless these coaches ball the fuck up and clean up the 20+ issues this team exhibited.EsophagealFeces said:
Press harder.haie said:What I liked:
What I'm concerned about:
TL; don't read
If you watched the Stanford game and this game and were a neutral observer, and didn't read ESPN's stupid fuck rankings, you would think they will buttfuck us, even at home. And that is unacceptable.
There's your fucking football analysis you dumb fucking alley mutt fucking doogs.
No wonder you never talk football. -
the false start on 4&1 in the first series against sample made me want to go drive a us womens soccer team van drunk.DoogieMcDoogerson said:plays.
Concerns
=======
1) Stupid penalties -- false starts, PI calls
instead i "sobered up" for a trip to arby's.
seriously though, way to set the tone early for a fucking dreckfest, drew. -
Think positive. There's an obvious shit-ton of stuff to "clean up" before the next game. "It's gonna be hard" to play "mistake-free football" against a "quality team" like Stanford, but "we're gonna be prepared. I can guarantee you that."haie said:
Beating a "giant killer" that had to play a receiver at quarterback and another receiver at running back, plus a mountain west d line is fucking special. Fuck, some of you love slurping purple sludge out of Chris "It's Hard In This League" Petersen's asshole. We were woefully unclutch and unprepared. The quality of the conference is our only hope, unless these coaches ball the fuck up and clean up the 20+ issues this team exhibited.EsophagealFeces said:
Press harder.haie said:What I liked:
What I'm concerned about:
TL; don't read
If you watched the Stanford game and this game and were a neutral observer, and didn't read ESPN's stupid fuck rankings, you would think they will buttfuck us, even at home. And that is unacceptable.
There's your fucking football analysis you dumb fucking alley mutt fucking doogs.
I'm out of Peteisms now. -
lol you thought that was a quarterback with his godly 3.fuckall ypa? Lockner for HeismanFremontTroll said:
A WR at QB? Wtf are you talking about?haie said:
Beating a "giant killer" that had to play a receiver at quarterback and another receiver at running back, plus a mountain west d line is fucking special. Fuck, some of you love slurping purple sludge out of Chris "It's Hard In This League" Petersen's asshole. We were woefully unclutch and unprepared. The quality of the conference is our only hope, unless these coaches ball the fuck up and clean up the 20+ issues this team exhibited.EsophagealFeces said:
Press harder.haie said:What I liked:
What I'm concerned about:
TL; don't read
If you watched the Stanford game and this game and were a neutral observer, and didn't read ESPN's stupid fuck rankings, you would think they will buttfuck us, even at home. And that is unacceptable.
There's your fucking football analysis you dumb fucking alley mutt fucking doogs.
No wonder you never talk football. -
Liked
======
Biggest break of the game for the UW D was J.J. Taylor's last play.
-
AZ bored are saying it was a dirty play by Gaines.priapism said:Liked
======
Biggest break of the game for the UW D was J.J. Taylor's last play.
