Marques called.
Comments
-
Who lets Smiff fuck everything up? Who makes the final call on leaving Psalm in the game? Who makes the call on pussy punting or running a retarded counter on 4th and 1?
-
If Browning was playing with the defense Tui had, he would be on a 6 win team every year. Tui won the games despite the defenseTTJ said:He said winning ugly is still winning.
Bring on the Tree. They won ugly too. -
J is TUFF with his expectations.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Jesus fucking Christ. Enough. LIFPO.PurpleJ said:Pete is a great coach if you like losing a couple games every year. He isn't a guy who can go undefeated in a major conference, even a weak one like the Pac-12. Therefore, he is not the guy. I am always right. Time will prove me right. I will fuck off now and go get some perspective.
-
Then in your opinion, can that mentality flip by Friday, because you have to beat the bully to have a shot at the north and then 8 days later, go down to Eugene where they will have a plant the flag mentality against us and who they HATE, and knock that 800 lb gorilla off your back that' been there for 13 years?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Vita lets Dawkins go (that would've sealed the game).AEB said:Browning misses Chico over the middle for the TD.
Daniels drops a sick TD pass thrown by Browning.
Van Winkle misses two FGs.
How's that all on Pete?
Browning throws an INT when getting 5 yards and kicking would've been the best idea.
Our kids tried as hard as we could to fuck this game off because we are mentally weak losers, but fuck if we didn't win.
I agree we match up better than Stanford, but UA played a qb/rb/wr group that would be no better than the zero's 3rd string/scout team guys yet they moved the ball with success..
IMO that's a tall tall hill to climb for any team in such a short time. -
If you're asking me do I think we are going undefeated, the answer is no.godawgst said:
Then in your opinion, can that mentality flip by Friday, because you have to beat the bully to have a shot at the north and then 8 days later, go down to Eugene where they will have a plant the flag mentality against us and who they HATE, and knock that 800 lb gorilla off your back that' been there for 13 years?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Vita lets Dawkins go (that would've sealed the game).AEB said:Browning misses Chico over the middle for the TD.
Daniels drops a sick TD pass thrown by Browning.
Van Winkle misses two FGs.
How's that all on Pete?
Browning throws an INT when getting 5 yards and kicking would've been the best idea.
Our kids tried as hard as we could to fuck this game off because we are mentally weak losers, but fuck if we didn't win.
I agree we match up better than Stanford, but UA played a qb/rb/wr group that would be no better than the zero's 3rd string/scout team guys yet they moved the ball with success..
IMO that's a tall tall hill to climb for any team in such a short time.
-
Browning ≠ Marques. Clearly.MelloDawg said:
If Browning was playing with the defense Tui had, he would be on a 6 win team every year. Tui won the games despite the defenseTTJ said:He said winning ugly is still winning.
Bring on the Tree. They won ugly too.
My point is simply that Marques won ugly too. A lot. -
This was the first real game of the year. Mistakes were made. I bet we play better at home Friday night. Still time to clean it up.
Edit: Dawkins would start in Eugene. Fuck off. -
I would have fired Les Miles.UWhuskytskeet said:
J is TUFF with his expectations.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Jesus fucking Christ. Enough. LIFPO.PurpleJ said:Pete is a great coach if you like losing a couple games every year. He isn't a guy who can go undefeated in a major conference, even a weak one like the Pac-12. Therefore, he is not the guy. I am always right. Time will prove me right. I will fuck off now and go get some perspective.
-
I actually sort of agree. He isn't Urban Meyer or Saban. He hasn't proven that at all. He's in the next tier. I hate to borrow Chest's comparison because FTG, but the D'Antonio comparison seems apt.PurpleJ said:Pete is a great coach if you like losing a couple games every year. He isn't a guy who can go undefeated in a major conference, even a weak one like the Pac-12. Therefore, he is not the guy. I am always right. Time will prove me right. I will fuck off now and go get some perspective.
I didn't expect him to win two, three, four n.c.'s. So if that's what you expected, yes you'll probably be disappointed. -
What's with the censorship man?PurpleJ said:We may have won ugly, but it was in spite of the fact that Pete did his best to fuck things up.
