Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
I wasn't worried about our run game after Rutgers, because they were playing to stop the run, but...
Comments
-
And what if our passing game is way better than our running game? Will you guys get pissed to if we pass for 400+ yards a game if we only rush 80?
-
They can rush for 1 yard and pass for 10 as long as they go 13-0
-
I'll wait until we actually play a game to draw any conclusions
-
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
They can rush for 1 yard and pass for 10 in pink tutus as long as they go 13-0
-
Stanford is still 20 days away.dhdawg said:I'll wait until we actually play a game to draw any conclusions
-
Yes because every good defense will just play to defend the pass, since our running game is so fucking shitty they won't have to worry about it.CuntWaffle said:And what if our passing game is way better than our running game? Will you guys get pissed to if we pass for 400+ yards a game if we only rush 80?
-
The whole Rutgers played to stop the run is doog excuse shit. It shouldn't matter if Rutgers put all 11 men in the box, you should still be able to run.
-
I have no comment
-
disagreeallpurpleallgold said:The whole Rutgers played to stop the run is doog excuse shit. It shouldn't matter if Rutgers put all 11 men in the box, you should still be able to run.
-
If you had said before the season we'd be 2-0 with combined score of 107-27, even vs these teams, we'd have been happy.
Would I like 10 YPC? Yes. I'd also like shutouts.
But it's not going to be perfect.
The good news is that in yr 3 it's hard to argue that we're on the wrong path with Peterman.
Only question is how far he can take us.
