Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Officials Mormon Darby game thread
dhdawg
Member Posts: 13,326
BYU defender about to get tossed for a bullshit targeting call
Comments
-
so BYU loses their best defender on a clean shoulder hit because the receiver ducks.
So fucking stupid -
That just made me love Kilani Sitaki.
-
this one looks more like targeting
-
BYU should walk off the field
Edit:
Or better, win -
That wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
-
the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitGladstone said:That wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
-
and I know shoulder to head is targeting. and that's a retarded rule
-
dropped pass for Heisman!
-
What a joke
-
The defender is responsible for avoiding the head.dhdawg said:so BYU loses their best defender on a clean shoulder hit because the receiver ducks.
So fucking stupid
It's a bad hit that was correctly called as targeting -
Muffed punt just overtook dropped pass
-
Shoulder to the head is targeting.dhdawg said:
the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitGladstone said:That wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
Read the rule:
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/9/7/12829482/targeting-penalty-rulebook-ncaa-football -
I knew you would take this stance. Fuck off, he turned his back and hit him with his shoulder. It's on the QB for throwing a hospital pass and the WR for lowering his headTierbsHsotBoobs said:
The defender is responsible for avoiding the head.dhdawg said:so BYU loses their best defender on a clean shoulder hit because the receiver ducks.
So fucking stupid
It's a bad hit that was correctly called as targeting
-
Doesn't mean its not bullshit that should be changedTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Shoulder to the head is targeting.dhdawg said:
the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitGladstone said:That wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
Read the rule:
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/9/7/12829482/targeting-penalty-rulebook-ncaa-football -
yes. notice how I said the rule is retarded.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Shoulder to the head is targeting.dhdawg said:
the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitGladstone said:That wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
Read the rule:
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/9/7/12829482/targeting-penalty-rulebook-ncaa-football -
Those things are also true, but the defender has to just make a tackle there instead of going for a big hit.dhdawg said:
I knew you would take this stance. Fuck off, he turned his back and hit him with his shoulder. It's on the QB for throwing a hospital pass and the WR for lowering his headTierbsHsotBoobs said:
The defender is responsible for avoiding the head.dhdawg said:so BYU loses their best defender on a clean shoulder hit because the receiver ducks.
So fucking stupid
It's a bad hit that was correctly called as targeting
The game has changed. -
If it ever changes again, it will become tougher against the defense.Hippopeteamus said:
Doesn't mean its not bullshit that should be changedTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Shoulder to the head is targeting.dhdawg said:
the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitGladstone said:That wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
Read the rule:
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/9/7/12829482/targeting-penalty-rulebook-ncaa-football
The NCAA has to keep moving forward on player safety. -
I agree that is the case. They might even end up not allowing offensive players to lower their heads.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If it ever changes again, it will become tougher against the defense.Hippopeteamus said:
Doesn't mean its not bullshit that should be changedTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Shoulder to the head is targeting.dhdawg said:
the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitGladstone said:That wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
Read the rule:
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/9/7/12829482/targeting-penalty-rulebook-ncaa-football
The NCAA has to keep moving forward on player safety. -
I would actually support that rule change in the memory of Curtis WilliamsHippopeteamus said:
I agree that is the case. They might even end up not allowing offensive players to lower their heads.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If it ever changes again, it will become tougher against the defense.Hippopeteamus said:
Doesn't mean its not bullshit that should be changedTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Shoulder to the head is targeting.dhdawg said:
the 2nd one was targeting. the first one was absolute horseshitGladstone said:That wasn't targeting. Also nice INT.
Read the rule:
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2016/9/7/12829482/targeting-penalty-rulebook-ncaa-football
The NCAA has to keep moving forward on player safety. -
wittingham would be a retard to kick it
-
what a fucking pussy play. Your OL is blowing them off the ball and you kick on 4th and an inch
-
After the pussy attempt to draw BYU offside.dhdawg said:what a fucking pussy play. Your OL is blowing them off the ball and you kick on 4th and an inch
-
risky but hard to overly criticize
-
what a retarded play call though
-
Asking two guys to block three guys is bad football.dhdawg said:what a retarded play call though
