Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Just realized that Justin Wilcox

PostGameOrangeSlices
Member Posts: 27,217
is the DC of Wisconsin.
REALLY good showing by him in that game.
I don't think he was as good as Kwatkawski, but he is definitely a solid coach who will do much better now that he is free of Sarktitudes.
REALLY good showing by him in that game.
I don't think he was as good as Kwatkawski, but he is definitely a solid coach who will do much better now that he is free of Sarktitudes.
Comments
-
Agreed. I was chatting with some Wisconsin fans last night who thought Aranda (current LDU DC, former Wisconsin DC) was an edge for LSU but I disagree. Wilcox I do think is a really good DC.
-
Wilcox was always good against one dimensional teams
-
when there was minimal pressureRaceBannon said:Wilcox was always good against one dimensional teams
-
RaceBannon said:
Wilcox was always good against one dimensional teams
He was always really good against average and bad teams. Against good teams? Not so much.
I think a lot of that had to do with Sark's offensive gameplan...a lot of 3 and outs against Stanford (outside that one year), Oregon, ASU, etc. -
Why don't you just say that they were playin with House Money???DerekJohnson said:
when there was minimal pressureRaceBannon said:Wilcox was always good against one dimensional teams
-
Any idea if there was a caged tiger at Lambeau?
-
Or did he bang Allie Leforce for some extra mojo ala Erin?!?RaceBannon said:Wilcox was always good against one dimensional teams
I didn't say he did so don't twist.
-
Like the Oregon State game?DerekJohnson said:
when there was minimal pressureRaceBannon said:Wilcox was always good against one dimensional teams
-
Sounds like everyone is talking about the difference between Justin Wilcox and Dave Aranda. New scheme too?
-
Disagree. He was really good against traditional pro style offenses. He was shit against the spread.RaceBannon said:Wilcox was always good against one dimensional teams
-
Exactlydnc said:
Disagree. He was really good against traditional pro style offenses. He was shit against the spread.RaceBannon said:Wilcox was always good against one dimensional teams
-
I'm hearing Wilcox spent his summer looking forward to this matchup. He couldn't wait for his boys to get a shot at Fournette: