Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Auburndawg's film room: Pass defense
Auburndawg
Member Posts: 362
I finally got a chance last night to sit down with my DVR remote control and watch the game again. I particularly focused on the eight big pass plays that led to Oregon scores. Yes, there were big runs too, but on every scoring drive other than the first one, Oregon completed one or more big passes that kept the drive alive, or put them in the red zone .
Watching those 8 pass plays in slow motion three things were clear:
1. Mariotta made a perfect throw every time. He is a much, much better passer than I thought he was.
2. We blitzed once in those eight plays. Four times we rushed 4. Three times we rushed 3. Wilcox was clearly playing conservative and it didn’t work. Mariotta was completely comfortable and had plenty of time. Rushing 3 or 4 guys against 5 blockers is not going to generate pressure very often. Oregon, on the other hand, rarely rushed less than 5 guys. They blitzed. We didn’t. Big difference in coaching.
3. On every one of their big pass plays our guys made mistakes in coverage. Oregon, more than any team I have seen, likes to bunch up their receivers. Two or three receivers would leave the line together, and then break in different directions, and our DBs would hesitate, not sure who to take, the receiver would gain a step or two, and Mariotta would make a perfect throw. In addition, like us, there is run fake on every pass play. On the 65 yard TD pass you could see Shamburger first pause on the play fake, then hesitate when the two receivers came into his area. The WR went right by him.
Coaching , coaching, coaching
Our coaches chose not bring pressure. Our kids should have been better prepared to deal with their pass routes.
Yes, Oregon is great. They seemed to block and tackle a little better than we did. Mariotta is more accurate than Price. They are super fast. But we were also out schemed and out prepared.
Watching those 8 pass plays in slow motion three things were clear:
1. Mariotta made a perfect throw every time. He is a much, much better passer than I thought he was.
2. We blitzed once in those eight plays. Four times we rushed 4. Three times we rushed 3. Wilcox was clearly playing conservative and it didn’t work. Mariotta was completely comfortable and had plenty of time. Rushing 3 or 4 guys against 5 blockers is not going to generate pressure very often. Oregon, on the other hand, rarely rushed less than 5 guys. They blitzed. We didn’t. Big difference in coaching.
3. On every one of their big pass plays our guys made mistakes in coverage. Oregon, more than any team I have seen, likes to bunch up their receivers. Two or three receivers would leave the line together, and then break in different directions, and our DBs would hesitate, not sure who to take, the receiver would gain a step or two, and Mariotta would make a perfect throw. In addition, like us, there is run fake on every pass play. On the 65 yard TD pass you could see Shamburger first pause on the play fake, then hesitate when the two receivers came into his area. The WR went right by him.
Coaching , coaching, coaching
Our coaches chose not bring pressure. Our kids should have been better prepared to deal with their pass routes.
Yes, Oregon is great. They seemed to block and tackle a little better than we did. Mariotta is more accurate than Price. They are super fast. But we were also out schemed and out prepared.
Comments
-
yes, our team chose not to bring pressure however, almost all top level teams can get more pressure than we did from our front 4, DLINE is still lacking
-
Take away those 8 big pass plays and the defense played well if you take away some running plays as well
-
You had to replay "film" to come to the conclusion that UW was out schemed and out coached?
-
This was very insightful. I didn't realize our secondary would have trouble covering receivers for 7 seconds ...
Can't wait for the breakdown next week. -
Their pass plays were thrown on time, as designed. Why are people so reluctant to blame the DBs? They screwed up repeatedly.fivehundredmileDAWG said:This was very insightful. I didn't realize our secondary would have trouble covering receivers for 7 seconds ...
Can't wait for the breakdown next week. -
I'm just glad that in Obama's America people can proudly admit that they watch snuff films.
-
Can you go back and do some further analysis on the ratio of on time passes to off time passes?
-
Seems to fly in the face of the Wilcox for President crowd.
-
I actually agree with Aubie for once. We were outschemed, and they were more prepared for us, than we were for them. Which is actually a huge indictment of our coaching, as Oregon has been running the same thing for 5 years, and we have for 5 games. Who had more film to study?
Our back 4 are perfectly capable DB's, but they WERE confused numerous times, and that is preparedness, or COACHING. Yeah, I know, water is wet.
Also, what 500 said, makes it easier to confuse/seperate from DB's when you get 10 seconds to get open. How many years has it been since we had a capable pass rush? Bakers dozen? Fuck. -
what would have happened if we rushed/blitzed more peeps and let the corners fend for themselves more?







